Frage von Taste:
Hello!
I am totally inexperienced, but would like to see a cut system and a CameraLink growth. I have the Canon XH A1 chosen because it is new, and mainly has XLR inputs, which I need to all cases.
As an editing system, I would like a Mac Pro with Final Cut Studio growth.
Now I read that the Sony cameras in the dark just to be better shots.
I would like to record music from landscape photography to everything.
So the camera should be an all rounder, so I watch for the Internet, DVD, and movies can do.
Kann mir da jemand kongret say whether I am better as a camera to take?
Thanks in advance.
Antwort von Vitrend:
Topic: Canon XH A1
Forums Category: Sony ^ ^
If you're completely inexperienced, then I do not think it is a good idea, with the XH A1 begin. Surely it makes good pictures, (The Purchase-argument that it is new, I find something funny) but it is synonymous very professional, with many settings. I do not know whether you should take to begin.
An alternative, I will not mention that I leave it to others ^ ^
Antwort von Jan:
As you read something which is wrong. Which HDV Camera is similar to the FX 1 / FX 7 / Z 1 / V 1? At least in your area is called the XH A 1 more involved that I have a FX 7 films unfortunately confirm.
Through the concerted Picture perfect for the XH A 1 is just lot gefachsimpelt - times through today's posts.
Maybe you'll find in the thread a little bit about what the price range:
HDV camera-buying-please-to tips Sony HDR-FX1, FX7-or-canon-xh-a1 FX1-the-successor-sony-hdr-FX7 VG
Jan
Antwort von Taste:
Thanks for the replies.
I wanted to write why I like a very good camera wants to buy, although I'm still totally inexperienced in the prof. filming.
I believe if I am now an inexpensive, easy-to-use camera to buy, then I will be filming the garnicht really learn. And above all, I will then maybe after half a year to start a new search for a better camera.
I have read so many opinions that I garnicht more white. I like the Canon XH A1 s.besten of the possibilities, but I have synonymous read that some owners had problems getting this camera, simply because material recorded was away at the play.
I would buy Sony2100 the synonymous. It is not an HDV standard, but should always work. But I think it is the price too high. (used and new) This is why I prefer to say a few euros on it and Buying a HDV camera.
Perhaps someone has experienced filmmakers of you a good tip for me.
Thanks Again
Antwort von Axel:
Salute button.
Others buy a car, and for the roughly estimated 10,000 - 12,000 ¬ including important accessories I would s.deiner body shall decide synonymous (cyclists). Even the choice of Mac & FCStudio will save you a lot of frustration.
What makes me aback is the sentence:
"I believe if I am now an inexpensive, easy-to-use camera to buy, then I will be filming the garnicht really learn." It is - not in my opinion, but according to the logic behind your record is - very dangerous, a special tool for the condition of their own motivation to make.
Purchase your stuff and then, please, make a few very bad movies. And you let them not be discouraged. I know it is a truism, but think about times to see if this rate could not agree: Better a smart, witty Webfilmchen of a ¬ 200 Cam boring than a ham in Hollywood movies ...
And another quote:
"Well, I read that the Sony cameras in the dark just to be better shots." If you're as ambitious as it suggests the proposed equipment, you should see the beginning of s.einen with light suitcases in the costing record. Conscious dark images can be very tempting, but the real fun shooting comes only when targeted use of light. While others are happy that the camera still "taking," making you
pictures.
Antwort von Taste:
Hi Axel.
An inexpensive Digital 8 camera, I already did a few years. But since you can only record videos private, because the quality is not long s.eine prof. Camera comes out.
And if I have my days and then night dealing with the cut, then it would be nice if the raw material is already good.
I did many years prof. Recording studio. There is the same problem. If one is with lower quality (Microphone) aufnihmt already, you can synonymous in retrospect, not much improved. With a good Microphone, brauch man synonymous in retrospect not so much korigieren, and saves much time and nerves.
Antwort von Axel:
Then you are in dealing with media technology experience, your formulate sound driver after 18 years, the sounds: "Only with a Porsche is driving me to bring what."
Antwort von dihofi:
And another quote: "Well, I read that the Sony cameras in the dark just to be better shots."
If you're as ambitious as it suggests the proposed equipment, you should see the beginning of s.einen with light suitcases in the costing record. Conscious dark images can be very tempting, but the real fun shooting comes only when targeted use of light. While others are happy that the camera still "taking," making you pictures. Something general:
I know, unfortunately, the FX7 is not so good. But if I run a great effort, the subject is perfectly illuminated, etc., I think, brings me the Canon with its many manual controls next. Or am I mistaken?
