Frage von Tunnelblick:
Hi Folks, I have all the opinions I read quite a few and test reports, but a direct comparison of several opinions I think is better than just my trust.
So I would like to see Cam necessarily a good buy. The picture quality is super important to me. Now I do not know whether I prefer to be an expensive DV Cam buy, or just a cheaper HD Cam with a lot of accessories. More than ¬ 2000 I simply can not spend.
The XM2 is yes have a great picture, but it is still DV. In my opinion, not bad if it were not for the function about 25p, etc. .. However, fuktionene such as sharpness and so when XM2 manual operate better again ... If I have the HV20 but it would take, I would still have money for accessories. A second battery, and yet what would you suggest?
That makes me really mad! I ask you about your opinions ... I would like to Cam for hobby use shorts. The hobby is not too flippant to be seen more, I can simply not afford.
Antwort von Nacho:
http://forum.slashcam.de/xm2-neu-kaufen-lohnt-es-sich-noch-vt50466.html
Gruß,
Nacho
Antwort von Meggs:
That makes me really mad! I ask you about your opinions ... I would s.deiner times in my office and go about the following:
1. Where are the finished videos viewed? If you NEN HD Television have or want to purchase soon, HD offers you a better, sharper picture than SD. Distribute your movies in any acquaintances or family members? Which vision devices because there are or will soon be purchased?
2. Are you a Henkelmann type or a middle-camcorder-type? The HV20 is significantly smaller and lighter than the XM2. The design and the manual skills of the XM2 allows design quite a bit more than the HV20. Of this to benefit you but only if you have the possibilities of making use of synonymous, and not always with Vollautomatik films. A larger camcorder is better and the hand, but it must be synonymous lug. A Henkelmann allows a different camera work. The Micro is usually better on top and takes less synonymous noise than an in-built. Notably, the HV20 is significant noise on the course.
If you've clarified for you, whether HDV or DV, or whether Henkelmann Compact camcorder, I would advise you the following:
For Compact DV camcorder and sowas wie ne middle Panasonic 3CCD.
For DV and Henkelmann the XM2.
For HDV and Compaktcamcorder the HV20.
For HDV and Henkelmann something and save the XH-A1 Buy.
If you have DV or HDV does not really answer it, you have a Henkelmann type are at the proposal with the saving of the question, take the synonymous XH-A1. It has more manual options than the XM2 delivers synonymous and a DV-Picture, which is with the XM2 can measure.
Antwort von urmel:
So I think I'm more the type Henkelmann. I provide only manual settings! But I've just remembered that when I look at the hole XM2 now that I have in a year in 2000 ¬ in the sand shot did, because only HD is needed: (
Moreover, so synonymous is the real thing ... so'n 16:9
Antwort von Meggs:
because only HD is needed By whom? From the advertising of your customers, or of you?
Sure, if you have large NEN HD Television searched, or NEN HD projector, or if you are very close in front of your not so great HD Television sits, then you will be with the XM2 is not happy. Just as little as with the HV20, if you have a Henkelmann type are.
Moreover, so synonymous is the real thing ... so'n 16:9 What is real and what is fake? The XM2 provides exactly such an anamorphic 16:9 picture as other "real" 16:9 PAL camcorder. The picture is worse, in theory, lack of resolution pixels on the chip. Practically is still a very good picture out, before the "true" 16:9 PAL camcorders should not be hiding. The Picture will be Unschalten of 4:3 to 16:9 not weitwinkliger, it is still (synonymous at 4:3) weitwinkliger as the Picture of so many "true" 16:9 camcorder. What is important is what the final result comes out.
Antwort von Markus:
... because only HD is needed: ( The sales figures seem to say as something else:
