Frage von Calziglione:
Good day,
films of my satellite receiver is easy to archive, I created a few days ago the Dazzle Video Creator 170 to you. Was included Pinnacle Studio 10.5.
Unfortunately, the encoder me None alternative software operated by the goings embedded. Met me at ... but well, so synonymous have no great leaps in terms of post before.
All recordings are absolutely synchronously. Mpeg2 recordings would have to be reworked, so I sign up for the event that no satisfactory solution for quality divx direct recordings are possible abgefunden have.
Nevertheless, I would like to try. The images I've yet to find out is milky, lost, like a veil. Is recorded directly in DivX / Avi with 5000-8000 kbps. Saved by the intermediate step, I can go directly into VDub and next edit. Deinterlace is hardly necessary (as if at the time of recording an overlay would be made) a bit of cropping, mochmal kompremieren and everything would be good if just said blur / veil would not.
Jemad has a tip for me what I have in the chain of drivers, codecs, preferences in Studio 10.5, any saving in the same, the processing in VDub (filter?) Note must / can try next?
The Forum at Pinnacle directly scrap is so here is my posting.
I will now try a few days before I decide if the device goes back.
Should I decide what would be alternatives to Purchase? A device which is not quite as convenient, but reliable, Freewarefähig? Mpeg further with this, I can indeed synonymous. Max I would want to spend 100 euro, which has 70 current cost. About Canopus, I thought, is for my needs but too expensive.
I know it is not necessarily the most stylish place with the first post a topic to be opened, but I google already beaten 2 days without really enlightening info.
Look forward to your replies.
Greeting Calzi
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
divx is not suitable as a real time renderer
Antwort von Calziglione:
divx is not suitable as a real time renderer Let me just find out. Or do you have real experience with hardware divx/mp4 coding? Probably the least. But perhaps a reasonable suspicion?
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
Want PAL of satellite TV on your calculator capture. This is a solution using USB2 and DivX conceivable ill suited. Actually, this has long been discussed a long time.
You know Canopus, a Canopus ADVC-55 will cost 165 ¬ and you have a device that outputs DV and then where you directly can intersect with VD.
Why crutches other solutions?
Antwort von Calziglione:
Since I could you a lot of reasons. I assume the simplest: Money, without mentioning the relationship between these 80-100 euros more to my total monthly budget is. Since no special erwatre I understand, only the willingness on the parameters of called me severely limited, because if one wants to answer.
Trtotzdem must be a solution forth. The advantage of the virtually non-existent asynchronous recording, I unbelassen the Mpeg-quality is good enough that a non-complicated post seems to be possible (among other things).
In this context, it would not be hard to know whether, but when I go on mpeg, max it for 100 euros total recommended products. Possibly. synonymous with its hardware encoder functions with freeware receive?
I suspect that the slightly blurry / milky, but otherwise good picture of the direct-recording divx Two reasons COULD:
1. the one-pass hardware encoded. Contrary to me, I can egtl. not imagine.
2. the attempt was made to the drawbacks of the one-pass in the hardware encoder with certain settings, filters to correct this.
Jmd. other ideas?
What now? Mpeg 3-step process? Or there is the possibility in Vdub, when necessary anyway after editing (here 1-mer), the negative effects Abzudämpfen?
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
I used to using TV in the graphics card and VDub capture function directly into the Panasonic DV gecatured. Zero cost, because the graphics card was already in it. What you must invest the time to read and try.
Antwort von Calziglione:
Yes, true. the time I would have taken me probably synonymous, but my GraKa has no input. And since I had to invest before, I tried in my little part to findent that some many opportunities for successful encoding promises.
A freeware tool I have found, incidentally, was the least Picture of Dazzle reads:
http://www.chip.de/downloads/CaptureFlux_22205841.html
, But fails s.Soundeingang same, so the merits of man is robbed and again on the sound card for sound must go.
In each instance an access to the embedded drivers studio software without enormous effort, hmm ...!?
Edit: The Terratec Grabster as synonymous is relatively widespread. When would maybe similar problems, but perhaps not so consistently? Will probably be next other freeware versions try. Would it be possible the hardware is somehow different to control.
Who experiences in the direction has made possibly synonymous with Proplem one-pass weaknesses (fig. milk?) To mask using freeware ... Thanks.
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
Then take the
http://www.hauppauge.de/pages/products/data_pcifm.html
59 ¬
Antwort von Calziglione:
Then take the
http://www.hauppauge.de/pages/products/data_pcifm.html
59 ¬ Thanks, but "... max. 384x288, 25fps, MPEG-1 ..." iist too little. Is synonymous with other cards similar values, I know, but what? Pure performance data will not synonymous. The performance s.Ende must agree. Which chipsets, compatibility of software / freeware for example. Possibly. other solutions in addition to Firewire Canopus? Since experiences are worth gold ...
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
You just need the hardware and install the card drivers. Then with VDub or above your software capture. Not with the Hauppauge capture scheiss
Antwort von Calziglione:
Is clear to me but I is about alternatives within the hardware coding. And there is the way that it is "too little" are devices, so manufacturers are not in a dream incursions Drivers would open for them, synonymous if it is a breeze for them.
Well ... maybe not peanuts just because the cut for the compatibility of the drivers is already effort. The source code, so then would disclose, and that Pinnacle Dazzle certainly has not been incorporated.
As it happens, but freeware is the device response ...
The second question is yes synonymous, the filter of what I have described effects might counter?
Antwort von Markus:
Unfortunately, the encoder me None alternative software operated by the goings embedded. Pinnacle Liquid were synonymous, but the benefit to you even less. So just for info.
The images I've yet to find out is milky, lost, like a veil. Already seeing the original MPEG2 files, or so the veil is only when editing? Or is it just to do the experiments with DivX (as
in one of your postings
Is clear to me but I is about alternatives within the hardware coding.
Is there a particular reason, the TV pictures with the computer to do? A DVD or Harddisks-/DVD-Recorder that would be optimal.
Antwort von Calziglione:
Pinnacle Liquid were synonymous, but the benefit to you even less. So just for info. Good to know, would have surprised me but synonymous.
Already seeing the original MPEG2 files, or so the veil is only when editing? No, the original MPEG like to see how I look at the raw material before processing such exercises. So the little quirks to be completely resolved, interlace, etc. etc., but has depth.
I had tried just before I'm going (but I do the same again someday). Had the distinction of One-Pass and Multi-pass underestimated synonymous and thought that such matters more in the control panel of the studio itself appear, but had to Divx go-menu itself.
This strengthens my suspicion that the hardware in one-pass processing is applied. Would then probably synonymous already a wahnsinn processor stuck indoors in the small part. From the data connection s.den not to speak. * g *
Is there a particular reason, the TV pictures with the computer to do? A DVD or Harddisks-/DVD-Recorder that would be optimal. Yes, I'm something like a film collector and synonymous gladly share with others, personally I believe. There is a different frequency as required for occasions. Is similar to sticker albums:). Moreover, I am not a home theater fanatic and like to watch old movies relaxed inner tube, with good stereo sound. Length, are hard to me too insecure / felxibel. About Festplattenrecoreder I had thought of doing. Müste but a few features that cost, or to weigh the quality and compatibility went.
It's a pity that the fast Carefree only recording on the sheet stands. Other hand, I still saved a cut, should I someday the studio is good enough to dominate and ausreichnde functions to VDub to make superfluous.
Would still interesting to know what other software from the fundamental possibility of the device would make. Are there any filter in Vdub, or studio, to which we could recommend to the Milchglaßscheibe edit?
Should it stay, the device is ok for 70 euros I think. Or what do you think? Have much negative about Studio 10.5 read. Slim, the software is not permanent and Nachlizensieren at every third button is more than annoying. Other hand, I will confine myself to the basic functions and as long as the Met ... I am probably taking it (after a few more-successful attempts). Ebay is filled with the parts, but probably synonymous, because they are almost unrivaled. That the Divx Capturing a blind-argument is jtzt-for me-probably. For the same price but is probably better to grab than to Dazzle Grabster. Although, as I said-in which more hope it would make sense to operate with freeware (anyone?).
Do we have the licenses for egtl. what to pay? what if I get my new system up?
Greeting
Edit: Basically, the question next several specifically on this device yet. Are there any good / bad experiences with alternatives Hardwareencodern max. 100 euros?
