Infoseite // DOF on SonyVX of 1000 dark



Frage von Meister am Mac:


Dear community!
I have a matching SonyVX1000 with DOF (South Korea Import). The problem is in addition to the usual story on its head, that the picture is VERY dark and a black vignette s.Rand forms. All known issues but with other cameras with attached DOF Picture still looks irgentwie better. I had hoped the faint VX gives me no line through the bill. What can I do?
LG
Master s.Mac

Space


Antwort von bgk:

"Master s.Mac" wrote: Dear community!
What can I do?


Other Camera? Other DOF-? More light?
Excuse the unqualified answer, but your question was a steep template for ... * SCNR *

Regards,
BGK

Space


Antwort von Meister am Mac:

Clearly understand :-)
No. So that I have tried everything, is clear.
I thought perhaps I have just one step in the Postpro "forgotten" or something, because those parts usually deliver better pictures.
Thanks anyway!
Master s.Mac

Space


Antwort von Basti27:

Hi,

the problem is obvious. The ... That is the difference between "expensive" aka SGPro adapters / Blade, Letus, Redrock, etc. and the apparently favorable from the other end of the world.

Quality has its price .... try to get rid of it and buy what you hand festival.

Regards

Space


Antwort von Meister am Mac:

okay nothing much has the cost, I will go, eventually, the money together with a sale of the VX then better in a new cam or invested?
LG
Master s.Mac

Space


Antwort von Axel:

True, of course. A light-feeding is the main cause of dark images. But synonymous with bright, newer cameras and the light, perhaps only a total aperture level (realistically) "costs", there are two factors that were not addressed:

1. The KB-Lens. In your case, it must already have at least F1.4. 2.0 is a full Aperture darker. Is this true?

2. The existing light. Images without contrast always look bleak. Make a test with a strong light source, with light and shadow, as you normally would avoid video.

Space


Antwort von bassti:

ne net vx1000 is anything but faint?

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"bassti" wrote: ne net vx1000 is anything but faint?

For current conditions, it is faint. It still has good color in low light, thanks to its 3CCD, it was its successor, the VX 2000, as the "Queen of the Night" became famous, but synonymous they would play in the midfield today.

But it is in relation to a no criterion, since we are already plenty of lighting equipment. Gain should be looked at do not use, and intelligent without amplification, while noise reduction is synonymous to modern cameras suddenly no longer so bright.

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Axel" wrote: ... it was her successor, the VX 2000, as the "Queen of the Night" became famous, but synonymous they would play today in the midfield ...
The nickname "Queen of the Night" was the Panasonic counterpart to the VX1000, which is then in the discipline of the VX2000 has been removed. Their minimal yet photosensitive successor VX2100 is still the unrivaled reference this class in Lowlight - of "middle" may be because the question.

Space



Space


Antwort von Axel:

"Bernd E." wrote: "Axel" wrote: ... it was her successor, the VX 2000, as the "Queen of the Night" became famous, but synonymous they would play today in the midfield ...
The nickname "Queen of the Night" was the Panasonic counterpart to the VX1000, which is then in the discipline of the VX2000 has been removed. Their minimal yet photosensitive successor VX2100 is still the unrivaled reference this class in Lowlight - of "middle" may be because the question.


With the exception of the VX 2100 had / have these cams I had to follow in using the Pana DVX 100, the SonyFX1 the Pana HVX 200, Canon A1 and the SonyEX-1. Without test comparisons in detail to know: The ability of the VX 2000, in light of three candles and the faces around the table to be seated show was impressive and was synonymous excessively used. Such recordings, I can no more be done, but had the impression that the newer cams were also very bright, as I said without gain. The EX-1 appeared (Disco) light yet again to be stronger, a subjective impression, perhaps wrong.

A student from Dortmund camera made last year a report s.meinem workplace, s.dem a 30 m long, dark gray coated tube ( "Das Boot"), only 7 watts of three energy-saving lamps will be lit. For use, a studio camera with 2 / 3 "chips, Pal SD, some older box. Lowlight From such Prosumercams can only dream of.

The Lowlightfähigkeiten but should not affect s.Mac masters. "Existing Light" (an old advertising argument still from Super 8 hours) falls with the adapters work with any flat, unless the sun gives it love unabated. That the existing light almost never enough, forces one to rethink. A little sweeping and provocative two theses:

1. One is no good for shooting in the reportage style. Here is more about photography, scenic work.

2. With fully controlled lighting all images will be better. You can then up for discussion, whether with or without it would be better, but Lowlight is simply no longer an issue.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash