Frage von SPYcorp:
Hi. hab grad father here miniDV Canon i710 to capture and as authors, because it has no Firewire. ( "Son, go ahead, you know yourself more clearly so ".... but * G)
Hab mich erstmal where familiarized with FireWire. Funzt extent synonymous.
Now, I have recommended several times (trail) Progrès usUlead Video Studio 9, Pinnacle Studio 10, Free-DV + ProCoder2, tried to give him one.
Is it worth synonymous Adobe Elements 2 test? Must I shovel namely erstmal PIV laptop space, wiel my big "only" nen Barton: (.
Have so far only TV recordings edited and recoded, so authors on DV still a few questions have arisen.
1. Depending on the program will capture me in a different DV codec proposed (name). If the only s.Programm or are there differences. I thought DV-avi = DV-avi.
2. Hab erstmal the entire tape with ulead captured. Here are the finished dv-avi, which affects especially when seeing movement, horizontal lines / distortion, converts what then adversely.
If the s.der camera recording or s.capturecodec?
3. This whole Übergangseffektekram is erstmal Secondarily, which is why I tend to grad combined free-DV and ProCoder Express. The mpegs then author with DVD-lab.
4. On the tape are synonymous, and a few dim interior space (New Year) recordings, which act noisy. Gibs in the programs filter so that the mpeg is simply not as "squishy."
Antwort von Markus:
1. Depending on the program will capture me in a different DV codec proposed (name). If the only s.Programm or are there differences. I thought DV-avi = DV-avi. There are differences. For example, I work with the Matrox DV codec, because my video card, the preferred.
2. Hab erstmal the entire tape with ulead captured. Here are the finished dv-avi, which affects especially when seeing movement, horizontal lines / distortion, converts what then adversely.
If the s.der camera recording or s.capturecodec? Search -> "interlaced" or "picket fence effect" or "comb effect"
3. This whole Übergangseffektekram is erstmal Secondarily, which is why I tend to grad combined free-DV and ProCoder Express. The mpegs then author with DVD-lab. This is not a question but an observation.
Antwort von SPYcorp:
This is not a question but an observation. Ähmmm. Yes. Ashes over my head. Man (n) should not even post very quickly between getting up and breakfast.
to 1.) Gibs of me at the above programs dv-avi's a "better" or is that like other codecs Glaubsfrage ne?
to 2.) OK. Hab mich mal bissel well read on (de-) interlacing.
Just so I understand correctly.
The camera takes on gernerell interlaced and interlaced wenns theor I can leave only for TV DVD is processed. Disturbs only s.PC interlaced monitor. Progressive reclamation would be better?
PS Hab grad found at the ProCoder
Source: interlace DV_avi: buttom but at
Target: DVD_masterting qual. surrounded on upper?
Must / should I change that maybe? Here is the forum for the discussions somehow nix clear out (except for "better interlaced Soure = target")
I stroke No. 3 of the top and replaced with ner new question
3.) At the bottom of the screen is (synonymous after converting) a flimmernter stripes. Where is the forth, and especially as I get the path?
Antwort von coconut:
..........
3.) At the bottom of the screen is (synonymous after converting) a flimmernter stripes. Where is the forth, and especially as I get the path? If he's bothering you with so-called croping. But if you shoot out of your DVD's to create want to see later this s.TV to forget them easily. Which lie in the so-called Overscanbereich and are no longer visible. In any case, when tube televisions .....
TFT's example, there should be different. I can not rate it, because I have none.
Antwort von Markus:
In any case, when tube televisions .....
TFT's example, there should be different. I can not rate it, because I have none. Also LCDs, plasma TVs and projector have a Overscanbereich, for each analog Videozuspielung (eg of VHS), the distortion at the margin. And wants to see for ninth. ;-)
The camera takes on gernerell interlaced and interlaced wenns theor I can leave only for TV DVD is processed. An unqualified Yes.
Disturbs only s.PC interlaced monitor. Progressive reclamation would be better? This must be weighed: it burns a DVD video to be viewed on different devices (Television and computer monitor), then keep the video his fields. The software player then performs the playback of the DVD s.PC monitor on deinterlacing.
If the target is not a video
file, which will operate only s.Computer, then you have to deinterlace the video. At the same time we should reflect on the aspect ratio, for 720 × 576 pixels otherwise result the aspect ratio (720:576 =) 5:4, 4:3 and therefore not certainly not 16:9. ;-)
Learn More:
Pixel Aspect Ratio vs. video. Computer
Antwort von coconut:
In any case, when tube televisions .....
TFT's example, there should be different. I can not rate it, because I have none.
Also LCDs, plasma TVs and projector have a Overscanbereich, for each analog Videozuspielung (eg of VHS), the distortion at the margin. And wants to see for ninth. ;-) @ markus
Thanks for the info. I felt as if I had the reads in a forum. Otherwise, so logically, if the overscan is there wants to see .... None ;-)
Antwort von Markus:
Also LCDs, plasma TVs and projector ... Except maybe when you connect a PC via the VGA or DVI connection with the image output device. Since it would be obvious if a TV / projector is the Picture in the underscan mode. I have not tried this yet ... now it was not necessary.
