Frage von monheider:
Hello experts, I've read that DV format tapes before, in this one by the camera is running. Does it make sense? What's the point?
Thanks for your answers
Monheide
Edit from Mod: question in the section "camcorder-accessories folder.
Antwort von stepi1974:
Because you have something wrong aufgeschnapt, or someone you wanted to roll.
Antwort von nico:
Well, it is not unreasonable. By preformat receives a continuous time code on the tape and avoid capture problems synonymous if the tape in between times from the Cam was taken.
Antwort von stepi1974:
Well, it is not unreasonable. By preformat receives a continuous time code on the tape and avoid capture problems synonymous if the tape in between times from the Cam was taken. Thanks Nico
Antwort von pingu2k:
Da hab ich doch ne smooth false information given. sorry.
You live and learn.
Thank you
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... so it is not unreasonable ... In this context, synonymous dissenting view interesting:
www.dvuser.co.uk/content.php?CID=3
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von monheider:
Oh, thanks for the tip. But ... what is right?
Greeting
Monheide
Antwort von Wiro:
It is true that today with the DV tapes are no longer to do it, but it can make it more comfortable if it is. A law, there is not.
The origins of the Vorschwärzens lie in the analog days when one of the Postpro Mazen, in principle, has Insertmodus cut - this was a continuous CTL track needed by the striping was generated. Also recording tapes were vorgeschwärzt, since the magnetic layer of a band only at the 2nd Pass the full magnetizable achieved (so-called NTC). But this is no longer relevant - for zeros and ones you no longer need the last ounce of remanence from the bands herauskitzeln ;-)
Greeting Wiro
Antwort von monheider:
Thanks Wiro, You're a real expert or specialist
