Frage von JulianW:
Hi everybody,
right now I want to compile with the DVD Architect DVD in the raw material consists of three large video files, and I want to have results in two DVDs. Say: The Middle video file must be divided in the middle.
In itself, I thought if I set the start and end points, it is encoded synonymous only the video material, which sits within the start and end points. But I'm somewhat shocked, even if I put the points on just a 5-minute range, then show me what s.of for 4 GB of memory used ... that can not be. If I make it bigger the area is synonymous to 4.3 GB, if I make it smaller but not less than 4 GB. I realize this is not restrained.
So, once testhalber put together a DVD, only five Mniuten video material selected, but just of the large file. Later, peeped into the VOB files ... because the entire video material with is inside. I am dumbfounded ... If the video so I would reduce to just a few minutes in the DVD Architect, but actually takes the complete file with the DVD to play then only the appropriate section?
This then brings me to the next problem. All three video files are in mpg format before. The center must be shared. Am I correct that I did not even do better with Vegas Pro, because then the video completely recalculated?
And a third question: I want later from another video, which is about 3 hours to make, various Zusammenschnitte, and thought that once the rough cut is done once can eich simply by selecting an architect, what areas I want to have it on the DVD . However, if the entire film will be carried on DVD, then that would be harebrained: On a 30-minute promotional DVD is not supposed to be three hours of footage on it.
How do you handle it? Do I have everything ever previously been cut, rendering, and only then bring on the DVD, or the architect can teach any way that it grabs only the synonymous set of video on a DVD?
Love, Julian!
Antwort von JulianW:
Correction: I found the solution, no further answer needed!
If there is time someone else tries to work around here in the near future (very intelligent) type of DVD Architect Studio to:
Under "File" / "Optimize" is being used to encode each track, select "New", which is set to "No". As long as the "No" to the Architect simply blow the entire digital video files to DVD and only uses chapter markers. Once "is selected, new code" is rendered all things new and unnecessary footage cut out here. Result: When this option to "Yes" is synonymous shows the display of only a few MBs, if I want to encode only a portion of the video.
So everything fits.
Love, Julian!
Antwort von Marco:
DVD Architect is not meant editing software, but only for authoring purposes. Cutting / splitting / trimming you should with Vegas.
But if you authorizes the Reencoding can be used synonymous excerpts (by start and end points), but then that could just as well or better be done with Vegas.
If you use in Vegas after the split for rendering of MPEG files on the material properties identical rendering properties, may interfere Smartrendern, so that recalculation of the video signal is not necessary.
Marco
www.vegasforum.de
Antwort von JulianW:
Hi Marco,
I am concerned, as I said, especially about packing up different sections of a movie on a DVD. The film is "complete", which I define cutouts on initial and end points as well as chapter markers.
I do not want zusammenschnippeln all alone in Vegas and ready for Architect ... I regard as a kind of architect "of his films-management software, where I select which clips I pack to the DVD. Thus, it makes no sense to me, each time with rumzuschneiden Vegas alone and then select the architect, but I'd rather have the video once, select the entire chapter and then select the chapters in Architect. Understand what I mean?
Since the actual film is already in process, of other Page, and to me only in the processed form, synonymous IMHO it makes no difference whether I edit with Vegas, and a render or Architect with selections and rendere. Quality should come out with the same, with the advantage that I can optimize the Architect for the DVD, the video rate, while in Vegas if I have a lot of arithmetic, until I know what quality makes sense.
The "SmartRendern" sounds synonymous but good. I have not found it, where is there that option?
Love, in July!
Antwort von wolfgang:
When you come to be of a different Appliktion than Vegas, then it might be in DVDA difficult to suppress a recalculation. The DVDA is there very own, stop accepting real primary material from Vegas for not re-encode.
This can be easily controlled - under Optimize sees immediately that the DVDA material again recalculate or not. But one way to turn off the new calculation, there are no DVDA.
Flexible in this regard other authoring tools, such as Ulead's DVD MovieFactory 6 + (for HD package including HD). Meanwhile synonymous already an older product ...
Incidentally, the latest version of DVDA is the version 5b - of the can update from you as a user of version 4.5 for free.
Antwort von Marco:
"I regard as a kind of architect" of his films-management software "" That is DVD Architect does not. As long as you found to get along with your way of working, of course, is no reason not to use the program in this way.
In order to draw on the Smartrendern Vegas Pro, you need to be initially under
General Options / Preferences tab, the entry in the
Long-GOP selected
Enable rendering without recompression (it is synonymous in the standard).
It is important that later have to fit
exactly in the Render dialog rendering properties of the material properties, since this process takes the user from Vegas, not auto. This is exactly synonymous but the difficult part of the task, if the MPEG-material was not created originally by rendering in Vegas.
Seen in qualitative terms, in the case of MPEG-2, a Neurendern about Vegas is the better choice, since DVD Architect allows for virtually no options for determining the rendering parameters. Rendering via DVD Architect is simply more convenient solution.
Marco
www.vegasvideo.de
Antwort von JulianW:
Hi Wolfgang,
When you come to be of a different Appliktion than Vegas, then it might be in DVDA difficult to suppress a recalculation. The DVDA is there very own, stop accepting real primary material from Vegas for not re-encode. well, when I was little. Otherwise I would have not had the problem that the whole film ends up on the DVD, although I have selected only excerpts. ;-)
Incidentally, the latest version of DVDA is the version 5b - of the can update from you as a user of version 4.5 for free. Thanks to the notice, had not even noticed that the new version is already published.
"I regard as a kind of architect" of his films-management software ""
That is DVD Architect does not. As long as you found to get along with your way of working, of course, is no reason not to use the program in this way. Yes, and Hi Marco. ;-)
So, I realize that DVDA is an authoring software, no editing software. Nevertheless, it is so much better than with Sony Vegas when I was preparing everything so that I composed in DVDA only the video clips. As I said, I am talking here primarily about a film that exists already, and I in Vegas does not even want to recalculate.
The problems, however, I noticed synonymous: I can not clever one-and fade out, I have to create extra film transitions Articles and Zoom, TV inserts or the guy because I did not get clean.
In the future I will also probably work differently composed only with Vegas, then with DVDA. Only with the one I just do not see any sense in it. If, however, probably quite synonymous deutlcih fact that there was next to nothing to do in Vegas with the film other than just reshape it "" what I can synonymous with DVDA. And the fact that I want Zusammenschneiden different "parts" of the film on various DVDs.
The main focus for me is to render as little as possible. Say: When I render the movie with Vegas, so that I did with DVDA does not render it again.
Very nice) would it be if some dazukommt the option that I could save unger Endert a movie in Vegas to then process it into DVDA still next to (of course here it's all about the chapter marks and borders. That in DVDA not only finished film, but synonymous projects from Sony Vegas, which has not yet rendered, may be inserted as the media. Well, it is more likely future. ;-)
Seen in qualitative terms, in the case of MPEG-2, a Neurendern about Vegas is the better choice, since DVD Architect allows for virtually no options for determining the rendering parameters. Rendering via DVD Architect is simply more convenient solution. Since I have with the rendering still as good as any experience I tend to use default values or change the option "s.Disc. Later, I see it differently, perhaps, the moment makes it for me but probably no difference. * laughs *
Antwort von MK:
When you come to be of a different Appliktion than Vegas, then it might be in DVDA difficult to suppress a recalculation. The DVDA is there very own, stop accepting real primary material from Vegas for not re-encode.
Rarely read such nonsense, for standard DVD, DVDA actually eat all that with the resampling is a maximum for Blu-ray projects!
Antwort von wolfgang:
That's not true, that was the time of DVDA2 so that the DVDA would have accepted relatively little. On the contrary, he even accepted relatively little - Exports from Vegas herraus and even from the Procoder Express, if I remember correctly. Satellite images to SD mpeg2 almost never about the Ulead DVD MovieFactory readily processed without re-encode to.
And one way to put an end to the renewed encoding has Sonybis today denied - even to keep the material is compatible with SD-DVD and Blu Ray to be synonymous.
Antwort von Marco:
"Very nice would it be if some dazukommt the option that I could save unger Endert a movie in Vegas to then process it into DVDA still next to" Since I am one hundred percent agree with you. It should be possible to import into DVD Architect equal to one Vegas project file.
This proposal should you place s.offizieller express desire to be an improvement, because as more users install this desire, the sooner that will eventually be implemented in a future version.
For a normal DVD DVDA actually eats everything with which the resample is maximum for Blu-ray projects! "
Yes and no. DVD Architect eats one way or another, almost every video format, whether it is a Video DVD Project, or a Blu-ray Disc Project. But only under certain conditions (when DVD-compliant MPEG-2) and is within very narrow limits as regards the properties of the material, it can ultimately migrate without Neurendern on DVD (and yes, it was only a matter here). Is indeed synonymous logical. That makes absolutely no difference in principle to Blu-ray projects.
Marco
www.vegasvideo.de
Antwort von MK:
Satellite images are a special case since they rarely synonymous in the DVD cases are compatible because comparing apples with pears.
For DVD encoded files will be accepted from all current encoders of DVDA!
Antwort von wolfgang:
Satellite images are only one example - and it's simply not true that it is accepted by the DVDA material from "all current" encoders. Leaving aside the fact that the material of Sataufnahmen probably synonymous of "conventional encoders" comes from.
But if you think .... if you please.
Antwort von MK:
But if you think .... if you please. Then call me once forced an encoder at the output which is recompression.
With over 100 commercial DVDs that I produce each year, I had been synonymous with fremdangelieferten material rekomprimieren even once.
And with satellite streams are often not met the specifications for DVD (maximum GOP length, etc.). I can but synonymous set incorrectly in other encoders.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Then call me once forced an encoder at the output which is recompression.
Today, I hardly use something different than Vegas for the encoding - but as I said, this problem occurs when some recorded m2t streams of Satsendern on - and was debated long and wide. Around here:
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=287
Clearly observe that the argument that the non-strict specifications of the DVD may be true. But it is so that other tools (DVDLab, Ulead DVD MovieFactory) the material very well without renewed encoding synonymous burn to DVD - and the material is synonymous easily in DVD burners will be played. But is not a commercial setting, and guarantee there will be None for compatibility.
It is true that even in the SD area, the problem is much smaller than in the HD area. It is there but very difficult. When one area in the Blu Ray as the HDV output of Vegas itself (! Wants author) - an mpeg2 based BD. And even though 1440x1080 50i is possible for Blu Ray, stop preferably at AVC. The DVDA synonymous here always calls for the recent encoding, which can be as tools such as Ulead's DVD MovieFactory will not be necessary. And synonymous here with a BD based on HDV 1440x1080 runs on almost all BD players.
And in SonyAVC encoder created 720 50p templates DVDA been accepted by the synonymous halt not synonymous when the material is quite suitable for Blu Ray. And one uses the MainConcept AVC encoder, then re-encoded in DVDA ALWAYS, no preference whether the material would fit or not.
Ok, you meant for HD, it could be so - there it is synonymous in many cases, unfortunately so. It's just in Vegas, then on the secure page, if the existing templates for the DVDA in Mainconcept mpeg2 encoder type used. Both the SD as synonymous in the HD area. And if you believe you are s.den SonyAVC HD encoder, and then use only selected templates.
