Frage von anna100:
Hello,
I recently had the problem with the temporary Jerkiness on fast pans. There was the main mistake is that I use the SteadyShot had not turned off.
A tip was of you was potentially too high a bitrate for the player. I've got something herumprobiert, and noted:
(I have not really understood what I was doing), the lower the bitrate the worse the picture. Or? Dreh'ich bitrate to the max. 9000 (Premiere) I get an error message: .. too high. But when a Purchase DVD hab 'ich schon rates at 90 Mbps seen? I think 'my players are processed such high rates now.
So I look at the GOP's movement. So far, always with 3 / 12 encoding, now with 3 / 15 tries. Some other combinations (given) depends on the calculator, or it somehow does not happen if he should start to burn.
Well now how do I get a better image sharpness without Ruckelei out?
So I'm really satisfied yet with what I produce.
So s.Drehmaterial is I do not think that's ok, at least on the calculator.
Anybody who has a good default for Prem.2.0 or Encore with MainConcept decoder for DVD creation, the eternal play nervt!
Thanks and bye
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Loud
Antwort von anna100:
True, accurate must have!
So:
-SD ( "16:9", PD170)
avi-cut in 16:9 Project
Preview window to monitor the program 50Hz + 32 "tube (yes, only conditionally suitable)
mpeg2-on DVD + R
Mainly plasma TV
Power-on DVD or Windows Media Player sees the DVD as "bad or worse" from. A little as 1-2% digital zoom.
What bothers me is s.deutlichsten in the totals to see (zb.Park with people in 50m distance, wackeldes leaves). They are not right to me somehow dissolved.
Nahaufnamen seen as much better.
But as I said, this is all very subjective, I lack the technical background for the whole story.
Gruss anna
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Hi Anna,
the PC presents video images different than a television. First, his pictures are progressive (ie, frames) and a TV picture is interlaced (thus fields). Moreover, a PC screen another Resolutionals a television, so the Picture calculated must be adjusted. Thus, there is blurring or called "combing" s.den vertical.
The resolution problem synonymous to large plasma or TFT Fenseher which (designed for HD) resolutions bigger, than for a PAL SD TV picture is necessary. Thus, it is synonymous with the computations here blurs. This you should synonymous with the normal TV can recognize. The best way to create a video image to evaluate quallitativ is still the tube TV (or TV monitor).
Look at your DVD s.einem times "normal" on Television.
BTW: To my knowledge, is the starting material for (gepressete and professionally mastered films on) Purchase DVDs no PAL video image (fields), but a full-sampled from the film. So look cartridge purchase s.PC better than self.
Antwort von anna100:
Hello thos-berlin,
first thanks for the post. I would even be synonymous able to actually purchase movies no PAL video can be so different from them.
Seems as if I should try next as I do, s.Hand the presets in the cut / burn program, my DVD's optimize the extent that they (for me) to be acceptable.
Clearly on my old 100Hz tube looked sharper images better, but the hatt'sich nunmal adopted, and the future is flat.
It just wants me not go into that level, I thank these "modern technology" no longer can achieve.
And a switch to HD is for me in the foreseeable future, no issue.
????????
Gruss anna
