Frage von JANP:
Hello,
I wanted a trailer with the DVX100a rotate.
How will the Picture, if you compare it to 35mm of imaging and can
turn aside to look in the movies? Is the quality will not be intuited?
How is it with "The Blair Witch Project"? But even that was only
With cheap Handycam and was rotated so synonymous shown in the movies.
If the result is still okay, or do I need to stay out of it?
MFG Jan-Philip
Antwort von Axel:
If the result is still okay, or do I need to stay out of it? Salut JP
I hope it's okay if the answer is "JAIN is". Movies that you like through their wonderful nature photography, or by their wealth or their color spectrum s.naturalistischen image details need s.besten a representation in the IMAX format. At any rate, a representation that can be "entitled High Fidelity".
"Lawrence of Arabia" I do not want to see blown up to DV and rotated in the movies. Many high-gloss films I will
not even see the other because they have nothing to do with
movies and the cinematic equivalent of "Andre Rieu plays represent the best classics in HiFi Quadro Super Surround.
"Blair Witch Project" I personally found rarely be idiotic, but in another thread just mentioned "28 Days Later" is a great, intelligent horror film that could have been better to not have a virgin 35mm Tic can be. This is because it builds on the complex language of modern cinema, in which the image resolution is only
one factor, in my opinion the least important after. "The Beach" from the same director and has a glossy packaging is in the Andre Rieu - league (about taste ...).
Another example: "The Island". Of what's Bruckheimer / Bay is frittered away a minute, of course, leads us to expect the finest photography. Scarlett is really very delicate flying hair, as are the digital displays on the whole high-tech props. But I maintain that the whole thing would have worked just as well to DV, because the history synonymous without kitsch and gripping action is.
Under the slogan "The Medium is the Message" should fit the theme of the film and all its workmanship on the technical aspects. How "shows 28 Days" does not mean: Small size, small issue.
Antwort von GerdB:
If the result is still okay, or do I need to stay out of it?
Another example: "The Island". Of what's Bruckheimer / Bay is frittered away a minute, of course, leads us to expect the finest photography. Scarlett is really very delicate flying hair, as are the digital displays on the whole high-tech props. But I maintain that the whole thing would have worked just as well to DV, because the history synonymous without kitsch and gripping action is.
Under the slogan "The Medium is the Message" should fit the theme of the film and all its workmanship on the technical aspects. How "shows 28 Days" does not mean: Small size, small issue. Fast approval, but small correction: the island is not of Jerry Bruckheimer produced synonymous if Michael Bay has done much else for him and the film could have been produced of Bruckheimer certainly good, though: had for a Bruckheimer film "The Island" probably Draft too much :-)) - maybe he was synonymous exactly why a flop in the U.S..
Greeting
jan
