Frage von rtzbild:Aloha,
Like
"Gesuche"
Zur Choice:
Canon WD-H34, NP 117, - Euro, 59.90 Euro ebay ( "Private" Dealers ...)
and
Kenko 0.5x High Grade, ebay 49.99 euros (Still Image Mundus)
Question:
What are the differences in quality are available?
Is the Canon with factor of 0.7 is now a brilliant, clear, "better" in the Picture, or is the same picture quality and I should be the factor of 0.5 with Kenko choose?
I'm on about, shorter focal length vs. Image quality.
I also wonder why only 0.7 Canon makes, and not 0.5 ...
* * grybl
Motive: News in Picture and Film, documentaries, etc.
Sincerely Olli
Antwort von Jan:
Hi Olli,
this is possibly so because the companies with 0.7 x or synonymous 0.6 x a very good quality can still promise. 0.5 or 0.4 x halt production have more Caused distorted shadows & lines, no preference how expensive and well the glass and the plastic has been paid.
Why Sony's 0330 or 0430er No, it can only & and quality or cost reasons.
I'm not convinced of Kenko, it was but for a different converter. I would recommend the original, synonymous is a reason for cooperation is the best (expected) with the camera, Canon has nunmal Optics has 60 years experience.
VG
Jan
Antwort von rtzbild:
Thanks for the opinions,
I have
here
LG Olli
Antwort von Jan:
Olli you have a buy now of two and tested?
VG
Jan
Antwort von rtzbild:
Yes, see
here LG Olli