Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Draufgelegt - Even Canon SX1 IS can FullHD of rudi - 19 Sep 2008 10:54:00
If the ice is broken again ... Canon has also announced yesterday that synonymous one of the new PowerShot models (SX1 IS) 1080p with 30 frames per second and over the HDMI connection can play. Sorry seems to be synonymous to be true, that for Germany is not a special 25p mode provides the film-look Indy freaks, should clearly located. The 30p is therefore currently the real drawback s.den new Canon models dar. The camera itself is not a genuine DSLR, but a so-called Superzoom camera lens without changing, however, is the CMOS chip at least 1 / 2, 3 inches wide . This in turn is far away of Full Frame, but nevertheless already represents the sensor size of the EX1. The 29mm Wide Anglemit (kb) in any case, sounds tempting. The list price is 569 euros with this much more moderate, as in the 5D.
This is an auto-generated entry
Here is the link to the news with links and images on the pages Slashcam Magazine
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
RUDI! We need 24 and not 25p! :-)
Antwort von Valentino:
RUDI! We need 24 and not 25p! :-) If you already Schlimé with 24p junkies. I think 30p is garnicht so bad, because there are at least not as much motion blur as 25p and HD may be via HDMI anyway s.den all men look flat.
So where then is your problem? That the camera can process synonymous 25p is probably the things synonymous via firmware update to solve. This Digi chip of Canon is synonymous in the A1 and inside the can by synonymous update on NTSC be converted.
Quite aside, do you want with its 5D II really a movie shoot? No not really, because you the money for the actors, the light, the Magnum Dolly and the rest is missing.
The video feature on DSLR, I think more for a nice Gimick, so I do not always take my video camera to be synonymous and need a video shoot can be more but not synonymous.
If I had a D-Cinema Camera need, lend me an I RED (synonymous if the Picture is not as the truth is), but at least can I insert 19 tubes, a FF4, a Kompedium and intelligent Cineoptiken s.die box screws.
Antwort von experimentalbear:
i-Contrast in conjunction with the feature film would be interesting. I hope the i-Contrast is dosed.
Unfortunately, no RAW for photos and no microphone input. Shame on you! Otherwise a good idea.
Antwort von Axel:
So I am not quite clear what this does i-Contrast. Since it is rather a good snapshot camera, the less one presumes that the customer is at home with Photoshop photos edited, it should probably leave the pictures as if they
were crunchy. It sounds like the objection from the neighbor thread to the big sister of the Powershot:
It is true however, that specifically Canon synonymous in the consumer area profiles, leading to a softer gradation lead.
But what you hear then whining about the Cinema eg gamma: too meager, no saturated colors, blurred are all completely normal consequences of a softer gradation. This applies both to the perceived sharpness impression, especially through which the image contrast in general, but especially by the contrast edges (digital sharpening) is caused or propagated as synonymous for the slack colors. The powders have not reinvented.
EDIT: I have it back in response: i-Contrast is a smart metering, for example, ensures that a head in front of the window does not silhouette. A fine thing. I asked the dealer where the camera knows which part of the picture I am happy as hell would like to have. He shook his head confused. And he did right: An
automatic exposure, the exposure on a
measurement based on the only global measure brightness, is stupid.
You should hear how it is in practice so that works.
Antwort von experimentalbear:
Canon says:
"i-Contrast
i-Contrast analyzes scene details during recording or playback, and auto adjusts the brightness in specific areas without loss of contrast. The result: optimal contrast and Detailbrillanz synonymous with difficult lighting conditions. "
You think:
They prefer the dark places of the gradation curve and making up something that many in the post as a measure for the film look Duchführung. If the internal image data before the code is high enough, this approach would even make sense. However, please be dosed.
So I am not quite clear what this does i-Contrast. Since it is rather a good snapshot camera, the less one presumes that the customer is at home with Photoshop photos edited, it should probably leave the pictures as if they were crunchy. It sounds like the objection from the neighbor thread to the big sister of the Powershot:
It is true however, that specifically Canon synonymous in the consumer area profiles, leading to a softer gradation lead.
But what you hear then whining about the Cinema eg gamma: too meager, no saturated colors, blurred are all completely normal consequences of a softer gradation. This applies both to the perceived sharpness impression, especially through which the image contrast in general, but especially by the contrast edges (digital sharpening) is caused or propagated as synonymous for the slack colors. The powders have not reinvented.
Antwort von experimentalbear:
very good explanation on
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=29379347
Antwort von SebiG:
What I do not quite understand is why on a photographic film camera would want to take. So there really is someone who is not a film camera to pick?
Then prefer a film camera for filming and photographing on a DSLR.
Antwort von experimentalbear:
To shoot you pick a camera, perhaps not, but we must simply leave less in the big lug and the Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera will broadcast some dangerous.
This film SLR cameras that make the 35mm adapters Garaus. I am crying DV - Video and these adapters do not tear after.
What I do not quite understand is why on a photographic film camera would want to take. So there really is someone who is not a film camera to pick?
Then prefer a film camera for filming and photographing on a DSLR.
Antwort von Axel:
This film SLR cameras that make the 35mm adapters Garaus. I am crying DV - Video and these adapters do not tear after. Certainly, the mere DOF-Effect is an adapter with a still camera with Full (ie not just those without it now to have checked: These lenses usually start in Aperture 3.5, there is one back at macro or telephoto range top, in order to further blur harvest) and achieved the best movie function. But there is still a power-Effect: The screen acts like a contrast filter. Definitely more analog feeling than just about `NEN chip. So although not quite in vain. Schnüff.
Antwort von Valentino:
Certainly, the mere DOF-Effect is an adapter with a still camera with Full (ie not just those without it now to have checked: These lenses usually start in Aperture 3.5, there is one back at macro or telephoto range top, in order to further blur harvest) and achieved the best movie function. But there is still a power-Effect: The screen acts like a contrast filter. Definitely more analog feeling than just about `NEN chip. So although not quite in vain. Schnüff. Ah, when you finally understand, at 35mm Full kinefilm is not equal to Vollfromat Small 35mm.
Here again the simple comparison:
35mm Small: 24x36mm ---> D5 Mark II
4 perf: 18,6 x24, 9mm -> page ratio 1:1,33 DC Camera eg D21, Dalsa, etc.
3 perf: 13x24, 9mm -> "1:1.85 slightly wider than 16:9, for example DC-Camera Red One, F35 and P & S adapter
2 perf: 9.3 x24, 9mm -> "with a slight cash 1:2,35
Thus, the 5D has a significantly higher synonymous depth blur as, for example, a D90 with a 35mm on Vollformatchip kinefilm owns, but no Full Kleinbild chip.
One of the optics, there is almost like being in the kinefilm a very wide range of fixed focal lengths depending on the price and quality Igrendwo a blend of between 1.4 and 2.8 are. There are even zoom of the Canon of 24 to 70mm Aperture 2.8 is a constant and can have a lot less expensive than a single high-speed Optics is.
Antwort von Axel:
So think smart and do the job, then write. A pure misunderstanding on your part.
Here I had the distinction with such images already posted. There are adapters (mini S & P), which (how? By exchangeable Achromats?) And KB-as synonymous film optics can use the most power but are designed for KB and so forth from the DOF with the D5 Mark II comparable, and I mean that synonymous of you in the passage quoted to have said ...
Antwort von Valentino:
Ah ok, take everything back.
And yet the rotating Matscheibe at P & S adapter is always the same size and therefore not at Super35 and 35mm film is small, or was I wrong. The I s.diesem normal miniature optics adapter does not change the picture window in the adapter or is the picture window 24x36mm really big?
I can so synonymous 35mm lenses on a 16mm camera to use, still keeping the image the same size.
Antwort von Axel:
True, at least the lenses should be different, and the focus should really synonymous to the Auflagemaß adapted. Perhaps, however, is simply the wording on the HP unhappy:
Optimized for 35mm film lenses - motion and still ...
Antwort von oese:
Hi,
times since I have a quick question:
Our old Mini-DV camcorder, the blessed time, and our old digicam is technically quite outdated already. Therefore, we flirt with the SX1, without much mitzuschleppen to film and photograph it (we do not have the highest claims ...). Previously Ahbe CIH but my Rohaufnahmen via firewire on plays and cut together, and start now because my (understanding) problems:
Can I get the footage from the Canon actually synonymous with no problem s.PC edit? Because there are certainly problems in the post due to the 30 fps? Or is that now because of the standradisierten HD resolution now no longer the big problem? Is there to post good quality and favorable recommendations?
loopful
Antwort von wolfgang:
RUDI! We need 24 and not 25p! :-)
If you already Schlimé with 24p junkies. I think 30p is garnicht so bad, because there are at least not as much motion blur as 25p and HD may be via HDMI anyway s.den all men look flat.
So where then is your problem? That the camera can process synonymous 25p is probably the things synonymous via firmware update to solve. Na 30p but has for us in 50 Hz country a disadvantage wrong - is not synchronously with the artificial frequency. And you can halt 25p in addition to Blu Ray authors, at least in the Spec ists not foreseen. There is actually better 24p or 50p immediately halt.
Antwort von WoWu:
And so we would be back at the "should" and "may" because not even need 1080p24 of HDMI devices are supported, because it is only
secondary to the
timing of one (25 incidentally synonymous).
As can already be happy that companies such as
Blackmagic Design's HD-Link Pro 1080p25 support ....
The best approach is still that we would all formats (25/50) and all the crooked American format abolish 24/48 and everything in it, because that is the only format, from which one out without great expense and with all other known methods Formats can produce.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Get it from just 30p per 50p AviSynth ... that goes without the ugly frame blending the usual NLEs ...
Antwort von Martin Dienert:
Hello Bruno,
Get it from just 30p per AviSynth 50p ... Give us a tip or ask how to do this (which filter, etc.) without altering the speed. If somewhere is a link would be nice.
Thanks in advance.
Martin
Antwort von Martin Dienert:
Now I have it but still found themselves:
http://www.hennek-homepage.de/video/video-of-digifoto.htm
The conversion of 30 to 50 fps is with the function "Changefps (50)" completed. According AVISynth help done by deleting or duplicating of frames. Order of 30 to 50 fps to come 2 of 3 images doubled. I imagine this:
11223445567788900 etc.
That need is bucking. Or I was subject to a mistake? I will try it when my computer finally cut with the calculation of a MPG-file is ready, I would not disturb him (it takes quite long).
Edit: When even a slight movement is bucking to be seen. This image is not discarded but are at least a half (25i) is maintained Jerkiness much less than of 30 directly to 25 fps is converted (Changefps (25)) there are 5 frames per second lost.
Martin
