Frage von Eggi:
Video Hello Friends,
until now I have video recorded in DV format (S-VHS) in Casablanca AVIO processed.
To purchase a new camcorder, I could make myself for SONY HDR-SR 11 or 12 to decide, because their products for recording in AVCHD - format is backwards compatible, ie, with S-VHS output equipment.
Since I do not at this moment in Casablanca S-4000 would like to invest, I want my next AVIO being used.
Therefore the following questions:
1. Is the processing of images in AVCHD - HDV or - in the format AVIO possible if this from the camcorder via the S-VHS output anywhere?
2.CONSIDERS the quality of the images so recorded in the same my usual AVIO DV-shots?
3.Ich wants in a new camcorder in the highest possible quality in order to later in S-4000 once again to be able to process, should order the immediate processing in the existing AVIO camcorder recordings as 16:9 or 4:3 are made?
Antwort von robbie:
1. Is the processing of images in AVCHD - HDV or - in the format AVIO possible if this from the camcorder via the S-VHS output anywhere?
Yes, in the usual way.
2.CONSIDERS the quality of the images so recorded in the same my usual AVIO DV-shots?
I know these cameras do not and knows not how the Downscaler works.
Due AVCHD and the Long-GOP procedural motion when surely worse.
3.Ich wants in a new camcorder in the highest possible quality in order to later in S-4000 once again to be able to process, should order the immediate processing in the existing AVIO camcorder recordings as 16:9 or 4:3 are made? HD knows only 16:9, because there is no longer 4:3.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Eggi
1 has already answered you Robbie.
2:
2.CONSIDERS the quality of the images so recorded in the same my usual AVIO DV-shots? The quality is, as said before,
better, because you only so far up to 5.5 MHz and have worked with the new technology up to 7.375 MHz working.
The GoP problem I would not dramatize.
If they do not interfere in the daily television program, it is synonymous to you when processing is not noticeable.
Quite aside from that AVCHD with significantly enlarged images reference works, which represents an improvement and this is anyway not so with a flat rate of MPEG2 - technique is comparable, because the architecture and the application of the GOPs in the techniques vary considerably.
Antwort von Markus:
2.CONSIDERS the quality of the images so recorded in the same my usual AVIO DV-shots? This question involves two aspects: The thing with the post was already described above, but the new camcorder delivers total synonymous a better picture than the old? Time regardless of the video image Resolutiondes there are still other aspects that have an influence.
This can only be answered if you betray us, with the Camera (Manufacturer? Model?) You have been rotated. It would also be interesting to know how far your shots with enough light is present or whether synonymous lot in low light conditions is rotated.
Antwort von WoWu:
This can only be answered .... Not "only" because the limiting factor in all non-HD cameras is the lens power, in conjunction with the sensor, which is already the performance limit is significant in the HD of the procedures in this area differ.
So it may, regardless of the camera only worse as long as the product is not on a tube TV viewing, which then would be the limiting factor.
Unless one uses a very "underground" HD Camera, the synonymous not more than 40 lp / mm dissolves. But such a camera I do not know.
Antwort von Eggi:
Hi Markus,
currently I use the SONY DCR-TRV320E, mostly in good light conditions.
Greeting Eggi
Antwort von Markus:
... mainly in good light conditions. Then, with no restrictions to be.
Otherwise would have been if you have a priority in low-light films, because the progressive miniaturization of optics and image converters, while the increasing number of sensor points, the light sensitivity of the camcorder tends towards worsening.
