Frage von masterkillmore:
Many know them surely!
The DVD Burner is in the pros or Aldi can buy.
Thus there are no misunderstandings, I'm talking here of external DVD burners. The burners of the VCR off and us into the world of the digital age have catapulted. The I ask you here in this forum is to put the!
If the result of an external DVD burner is better than what the
such as Breakbox with a Pinnacle DV500 reinzieht and then burn to DVD?
Can the quality of the burner with a standard DVD (DVDs Big studios like Warner Brothers or Universal Pictures) compare?
(When viewing s.einem computer monitor).
I want to know if you do not s.Besten HDV recording directly to DVD burning.
Greeting
Benny
Antwort von steveb:
Dear Benny,
crucially, what you for an "end product" want.
Direct Recording on a DVD medium, is usually only possible with strong compression. As it stop making DVD cams. An already compressed recording deteriorates you post and it recommends ways still DV / Mini DV. If you have no value but to lay, I'd rather be a DVD recorder guess.
Unfortunately, I (and perhaps other synonymous here) still not entirely clear what you want to record and how your DVD will look later on ... or rather, what you order instead?
Antwort von masterkillmore:
My concern is the HDV material in the best possible shape to burn to DVD. And since I export the results of the various editing software does not like, I thought that maybe the directly input into an external DVD burner (maybe with hard drive for MiniDV) the best solution would be.
Concerning the second point of view, I want the film on DVD in the best possible quality archive. I am however Rätzel of how the film industry, the economy is in an excellent film quality on DVD to capture, while we are with an unsatisfying, vague and with compression artifacts potential outcomes must resign. Or the other way around for a program which uses the film industry (Universal Pictures, etc. ..) to the raw material on DVD to get?
Gruß Benny
Antwort von megalutzi:
Hello,
Many know them surely!
The DVD Burner is in the pros or Aldi can buy.
Thus there are no misunderstandings, I'm talking here of external DVD burners. The burners of the VCR off and us into the world of the digital age have catapulted. The I ask you here in this forum is to put the! in order to avoid any misunderstanding, I call "the burner" DVD recorder (standalone). For DVD Burners just think too many people s.PC burner.
If you HDV material on a DVD recorder, burn, then definitely only in SD, so lower Resolutionund not in the best possible quality.
If you burn in the PC, on the other hand, you can using other compression formats (eg, H264, etc.) with better quality on DVD-save, but have the problem that no conventional DVD player, which can make a start.
Antwort von Markus:
I want to know if you do not s.Besten HDV recording directly to DVD burning. Do you want your recordings do not intersect, ie, of all the rubbish and unsuccessful rid of unwanted scenes? Duplicate settings, blurred images and the far too long scenes unchanged simply take over?
Why then is transferred to DVD? Then you could synonymous but the original band (at a higher resolution) perform.
Antwort von masterkillmore:
Of course I want to cut the tape, and then the finished film archievieren. Is synonymous me no preference which is SD quality. The question was yes, is the Qualiät a DVD recorder is better than the SD material to a cutting software. (In general) I have that as already mentioned, various editing software tested and found that despite the best possible optimization quality is not nearly s.einen bought film can reach.
Gruß Benny
Antwort von Markus:
I want to know if you do not s.Besten HDV recording directly to DVD burning. Then I was with the "HDV directly to DVD burn" apparently misunderstood. For me it was a camcorder, of his shots without stepping directly on plays. ;-)
Most PCs do not have adequate opportunity to analog video signals and many users is the use of an A / D converter, the synonymous of digital to analog convert can be expensive (*). This gives the DVD recorder, a big minus point.
*
The output from the video editing program via firewire, is converted to analog and then from the DVD recorder included. Most DVD recorders with DV Interface does not accept PC as a player, hence
the detour via an analog signal. The DVD Burners in the PC requires a little more familiar with the matter of the DVD-Video, but can be synonymous with the help of which significantly optimized DVDs. In addition, any additional investment to output a video -/Audiosignals s.PC.
Can the quality of the burner with a standard DVD (DVDs Big studios like Warner Brothers or Universal Pictures) compare? No, you can not. One put the home user is not outrageously expensive encoders of the major studios an AND other amateur filmmakers usually drive not nearly as much effort in the recording is technically perfect and dramaturgically Film-/Videobilder.
Antwort von masterkillmore:
1) What kind of technical effort?
2) What are outrageously expensive codecs are used
2) If the DVD recorder is really so bad, what is the best solution for Qualitätiv DVD Authing s.PC (which program makes gecapturtem HDV material from the best of our price range)
Sonic Scenario!?
Gruß Benny
Antwort von StefanS:
I am however Rätzel of how the film industry, the economy is in an excellent film quality on DVD to capture, while we are with an unsatisfying, vague and with compression artifacts potential outcomes must resign. Or the other way around for a program which uses the film industry (Universal Pictures, etc. ..) to the raw material on DVD to get?
Gruß Benny ... despite the best possible optimization quality is not nearly s.einen bought film can reach. If you're ready for a least 6-digit, but probably 7-digit amount to invest, then you have the first hand tool that Hollywood studios use to create a DVD.
Then you'll get, because you have to do everything themselves, and not dozens of people you s.der in parallel with the same task, to bring that many lines, and while to all the basics to learn (camera work, sound recording, post production, Tonabmischung, etc. ) and then implement in your project.
So if you are the money and time, then you have good cards. If you like one of these properties is missing, then only on the carpet to stay out of their own and can always next with increasing experience after slowly getting better be any self-tests when you befiregendes result.
That is not a template file, which is called as:
From shaking hands to Hollywood.dll
But what most here s.Technik to Verfügug and is thus quite good results, is short and just:
A camera, such as the XM2, VX2100, etc
An editing program such as, Vegas, Final Cut Pro, MSP, Premiere
A good MPEG encoders, such as Procoder, MainConcept, etc.
An authoring program for DVD authoring
... and, again, hundreds of hours self-tests, how to use the above device.
Greeting
Stefan
