Frage von mammamaria:
Hello,
I wanted to do with a thing to be sure before I import my material.
A colleague of me says he uses a special program (Cineform) to capture on the PC and there is already pre-de-interlacing, because the full-filmed material in Premiere CS3 allegedly fields in the program itself is processed. The question is this true and
the problem would be synonymous with Final Cut Pro on the Mac is the case?
Thanks and best greetings
Antwort von PowerMac:
No.. Correctly, each video program to work with real frames. In Final Cut Pro would be 25p each configuration. In the sequence settings, you must still Halbbilddominanz to "no" or "without" make.
Antwort von scubavideo1:
The HDV 1080-25p material SonyV1 is actually 1080 50i, which, however, both fields
at the same time were recorded. This prevents the famous Kammartefakte.
Final Cut Pro sees this footage, however, internal as a 1080 50i.
You lay thus a HDV 1080 50i sequence s.and lay the logged clips simply pure. Alternative offers Final Cut Pro synonymous to match the sequence format to change once you have the clip in the timeline draw.
Timeline 1080 50i, HDV codec Advantages:
[list] - fully compatible with the 1080 50i standard
- Does not render the entire sequence of format conversion necessary (= less quality loss by Recodierung, or save space by not consuming codec with high data rate) [/ list: u: 37d40538a5]
Disadvantage:
[list] - In Final Cut Pro, rendered speed changes (slow motion) look jerky from evil. That's because Final Cut Pro, the difference in time between the fields to calculate images of intermediate assistants. Since the Fall of 1080 25p no difference in time, is the algorithm unsuitable.
An example can be found here: http://scubavideo.de/clips/BioBusters_slomo.avi[/list:u:37d40538a5]
The alternative:
1080 25p HDV codecs with or ProRes422 Advantages:
[list] - slow motion look like geleckt
- When Verwendugn of ProRes422 codec can be equal in the Resolution 1920 x 1080 change (for easier compositing, etc.)
- Genuine progressive [/ list: u: 37d40538a5]
Disadvantages
[list] - the format is no longer TV-compliant (Who's stört ;-)
- Transcoding takes a little while
- ProRes422 HQ has approximately the same data as DVCPro HD consumed per minute and 1 Gb of disk space [/ list: u: 37d40538a5]
If I shoot 25p in 1080, I prefer the 1080 25p timeline with ProRes422 codec. The following test clips are created:
http://scubavideo.de/archives/284/langswitch_lang/de
Antwort von mammamaria:
Thanks for the detailed reply,
I now have the full recording all times captured on Recommendation 1080 with P25 setting. I hope that goes well.
Not to be s.Ende with a deinterlacer filter work?
Antwort von Axel:
Thanks for the detailed reply,
I now have the full recording all times captured on Recommendation 1080 with P25 setting. I hope that goes well.
Not to be s.Ende with a deinterlacer filter work? No.. That you have misunderstood. You are nowhere written that you are working with HDV, but it's like Powermac scubavideo1 and write: HDV1080 is for Final Cut Pro HDV just as you should be synonymous capture, and only in the timeline (sequence settings), the " p "appears. You can then choose whether or not the setting for HDV (> HDV 1080p25) to remain or ProRes (what with the frames themselves to do nothing, but with the overall quality).
@ scubavideo1: Thanks for the linked clip. Finally someone who has a "p" no nonsense and it dovetailed synonymous equal proof.
