Frage von PeterSeller:
Good day together.
I plan my zuzulegen the Panasonic GH2, so I find the photography synonymous videos.
I use to photograph the following optics:
Nikon 14-24mm 2.8
Nikon 24-70mm F2.8
Nikon 70-200mm 2.8
Nikon 50mm 1.8
Nikon 85mm 1.8
Tokina 105mm 2.8 mm
Tamron 28-75mm 2.8
My question now is whether it makes sense to use these Lenses with the Novoflexadapter s.der GH2, or whether it makes more sense to purchase the 14-140mm of Panasonic. Alternatively, it is synonymous another adapter of enjoyyourcamera.com. About the quality but I know nothing. Maybe someone knows this adapter and may say something about it.
Thanks in advance
Peter Sellers
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Counter-question? Why should it make no sense at your current Lenses use?
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von schibbe:
The adapter is worth every minute.
The 14-140s I would then set nurnoch actually, if you want to use auto focus. Also begins the 14-140s to Aperture at a of 4. Is ggegensatz to your existing lenses thus rather weak light.
Eike
Antwort von rush:
Since there is nothing your Nikon lenses to use! Are the good pieces but you got there ...
The sole loss of the AF's need to take you in Purchase ... Otherwise, there should be no problems.
The adapter must be kept totally come synonymous with G lenses to adjust the Aperture s.diesem you to ...
Antwort von PeterSeller:
Thanks for the quick replies!
So will try my luck with the Nikon - I s.denen namely absolutely nothing wrong.
Another question which I st accessories around it "needs".
The plan is to now:
Manfrotto Fig Rig of (a Steadycam currently is probably too expensive)
Tripod head Manfrotto 501HDV
Viewfinder LCDVF (is recommended that?)
Tripods and something light I've synonymous, but I think if you like the Ianiro-case to get.
Did I forget something, or is the compilation of this all right?
Antwort von cantsin:
Thanks for the quick replies!
So will try my luck with the Nikon - I s.denen namely absolutely nothing wrong.
Preferably in a good invest Novoflex adapter that supports the G-Lenses. The value and the quality of your Lenses it would be nonsense to save here s.falschen end.
Manfrotto Fig Rig of (a Steadycam currently is probably too expensive)
Why not a Glidecam HD1000? Fits perfectly in the weights for GH2, produces very good results and is not expensive.
Tripod head Manfrotto 501HDV
Not wrong or recommended if you want to swing.
Viewfinder LCDVF (is recommended that?)
Is this really necessary? The GH2 has an excellent electronic viewfinder, as opposed to other DSLRs - the offer only the display - no need to rule a screen magnifier or an external viewfinder. I would try at least once with the onboard tools.
Did I forget something, or is the compilation of this all right? Due to the smaller sensor is needed for Micro Four Thirds Lenses very bright to Tiefenunschaerfe effective to use as a design element - that is, Aperture 1.8 or less. Your lichtstaerksten Nikkor However s.der by the 200%-Compact-Camera Cropfaktor telephoto lenses. I would therefore superior to the purchase of the Panasonic Pancake 20mm 1.7 (40mm equivalent small picture). This is an excellent all-purpose lens for the GH2. At least I would give this acquisition priority over other accessories.
Antwort von PeterSeller:
The thing with the adapter, the LCDVF and the pancake is clear.
Allerd I come with the Glidecam 1000 is not far when the Nikon Lenses weigh all together by 1kg. And the Glidecam 2000 I is the beginning of something much. What speaks against a Fig Rig for? What I've heard so like it can work well after some practice.
Antwort von schibbe:
The question is, what you really want.
The operation of a Steadycam and a Fig Rig is very different. The Fig Rig is good if you want a good stabilization, while you are with Micro and Co, want to work without assistants. But you "hover" just do not.
