Frage von findus:
Hello experts,
I have already tried myself to struggle through the forum, but am still somewhat puzzled concerning camcorder-Purchase. We currently live in USA and want to support our multi Auslandsaufenthalt documented. Now the question is PAL or NTSC? Or what happens when I record mpeg2 to mpeg4. Have I then the whole trouble with no conversion? I do flirt with the SonyHDR-SR1. But I am not evil synonymous wenns cheaper. Achso to cut, I wanted to use Final Cut Pro.
Would be super nice if anyone of you experts could help.
Thank you
Findus
Antwort von Jan:
Then there are the same problems. Except the price played no important role, it would be the SonyHDR Z 1 is a choice - 1080/50i and 1080/60i alternatively record. Although it is synonymous not so much for you will, except there is enough time to record 2 movies, which is a Camera and an event is surely impossible. The SR 1 is synonymous ne corner whole way from the price of Z 1 and the content offered is 1080 / 50i - the American SR 1 1080/60i.
Difficult question, I would buy Pal device, if the stay is limited, and later permanently lived in Europe. Not without reason does NeverTheSameColour NTSC standard definition at least in the area. The 60 images in 50 fields to convert synonymous brings plenty of losses.
VG
Jan
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin,
if you do not just constantly in artificial lighting films, because you can take synonymous PAL, if you really permanently after a PAL country will revert back. With PAL flickers when it künstlcher Lighting more, since the light with so 60Hz is produced, if I may write times, but a PAL Camera with 50 Hz recording. The number of (half) frames per second have been so because of the power spectrum determined.
However, it is actually quite straightforward, an NTSC DVD in a PAL country play. Most PAL DVD players can do this, the newer anyway. Only reversed PAL DVD in NTSC country that does not work. So here is the PAL standard is clearly superior.
From this point of view there is nothing against NTSC camera, except that with the artificial light indoors when it is back to PAL country goes back. When that will be, and how relevant it is and if you then have the camera, you can better answer.
The SR1 is in MPEG4 on. Still, there is no software that can be cut. Do you want to edit it now, then accept it with a HDV camera, HC-3 or GM-10.
Antwort von beiti:
The question is, with what you later want to start the recordings. If they land on DVD (be it directly into the Cam, or later with hile of PC or DVD recorder), it is not a big problem. Most modern television and DVD player all in Germany can play NTSC. The problem of the regional codes (the playing of the U.S. buying DVDs to prevent) you own with no shots, the player must therefore not even be code free.
Incidentally, you can synonymous in Germany many NTSC DVDs to buy, such as recordings of classical concerts. Apparently even the music will now assume that one easily NTSC can play D and therefore the international normgewandelt recordings are not intended to be.
Antwort von Markus:
With PAL flickers when it künstlcher Lighting more, since the light so 60Hz is created with ... There are, however, synonymous Camcorders (usually the better models), one on an exposure time of 1 / 60 s may recruit. Then you can record PAL, which useine better Resolutionmitbringt (720 × 576 in NTSC instead of only 720 × 480).
The processing of NTSC recordings in Germany, I see as not as problematic, but may be an NTSC not PAL camcorder recordings reflect what the exchange s.Videomaterial under Hobbyfilmern here very much would. PAL can also be recorded only very poorly with NTSC video recordings in a combine.
Precludes that PAL in the U.S. only to very few televisions (mostly the newer and better models) can see, since this television standard is technically demanding - what is my estimation based on the outcome considered synonymous.
No easy decision!
Antwort von Quadruplex:
See, because this television standard is technically demanding Since I must now become a little contradictory.
PAL NTSC opposite needs a delay line, the color for a row caches. Anno dunnemals was truly something special (and expensive) - as it has with folded glass bodies rumgekaspert that - converted into the ultrasonic range - color for the required time delays.
What really makes the difference between what is commonly referred to as PAL and NTSC described, the underlying Schwarwzeißstandards: That's in Europe, 625/25, 525/30 in the USA. "PAL" in Europe has just 100 lines more - you can see.
In Brazil you will find PAL-M, also with 525/30. The color is in the analogue broadcasting is more stable than in NTSC - otherwise the picture but just grobzeilig as the U.S. NTSC.
Antwort von Markus:
I would not run too far, the only other confused. In the present case involved only the question NTSC-M or PAL-B / G. Who wants to know more can search through and find information such as usBeiträge
NV-GS400GN - Australia? PAL in Braslien. Interestingly, it is for the asker, but to know that it is synonymous PAL Among other standards, nothing with the system used in Germany to do. A Brazilian PAL camcorder can not recommend. ;-)
Antwort von beiti:
The confusion arises not least because it's old standard PAL and NTSC titles on today's digital devices transmits, but anything as a technically correct. There are even people who manage the 60-Hz versions of HDTV systems, as NTSC designate.
The Verarsche "Never The Same Color" comes of course the analog NTSC broadcast and hat with a digital 525/60-Signal nothing to do.
The old standards still play a role in so far as playback equipment for compatibility reasons corresponding composite signals can spend. For example, it may be DVD player for the French market, the so-called "PAL DVDs" for compatibility with older television sets in Secam composite output. On the DVD itself, however PAL and Secam no longer distinguish, the signal is simply in MPEG2 with 50 fields per second and a Resolutionvon 720 x 576 pixels stored.
Even more interesting is it when so-called "NTSC DVDs". Besides the Halbbildmodus (in the case of his own camcorder recordings would be) there's a full-screen mode with 23.97 frames per second. The vast majority of movie DVDs are produced in this standard. It remains then the DVD player to decide whether he directly BPS 23.97 "progressive" issues (eg DVI or YUV for beamers and plasma screens), or if he has a 3:2 pulldown and carries an NTSC signal for conventional televisions that tinkers.
