Frage von X-enter:
Hello folks!
I was faced with the agony of choosing me to go up a new camcorder, the question Währe CMOS or 3XCCD?
Thus,
the SonyHDR-HC3 or
Panasonic NV-GS300? Racking my brains you have a plan?
Greetings Alex
Antwort von prem:
I would clearly prefer the HC-3, the panny has indeed three, but smaller chips and thus the advantage of going lost 3 chips.
:: Www.deepcode1.com::
sounds, vision, interaction
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Alex,
which features are more important to you (see link below)? The HC3, for example, has no possibility to connect external microphones - except Sony's. : - / For the GS300 I do not know.
Worth reading:
Antwort von X-enter:
hello again!
I have read through all the pages and
Today was still in the shop, and then have the SonyHDR-HC3, and this time, the Panasonic NV-GS500 something auspobiert. Here are a few "Before and cons"
SonyHDR-HC3
+ Superfine Resolutiondes LCD
+ good wide angle
-L & R corners s.den rainbow effects (color shift)
Analog IN +
SIS-Stabilizer
-little one. Attitudes, almost everything via the touch screen
-no common information (aperture, shutter)
+ Nightshot
And as I have compared the Panasonic NV-GS500 viewed with
3CCD (3 x 1 Megapixel)
-Slightly larger than the Sony
According to the
no-control manufacturer Analog-IN
on the remote, there is a start button and an additional rec button? + Focus ring
-All functions are controlled by Joystik
+ Mic Input
Small-Resolutiondes LCD Monitors
Oh, if I am but for the decisions and the Sony HDV clips on your PC and edit games (when playing off will neuberrechnet as what?) And then on the DVD (I have no burning Fersehen HD) videos are a bit harder?
And also this site has made me a little or rebellious ......
http://www.fxsupport.de/faq.html
Greetings Alex
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
Oh, if I am but for the decisions and the Sony HDV clips on your PC and edit games (when playing off will neuberrechnet as what?) And then on the DVD (I have no burning Fersehen HD) videos are a bit harder? With the inevitable increase of 1080i HDV Resolutionauf PAL runterskallieren compliant Resolutionkann lost some quality, Sony's method works because the HC3, but very good, the test charts show it:
HC3-setting: HDV recording mode:
LinkHC3-Einstellung : HDV zu DV -Konvertierung/SD-Format (kameraintern) :
Link HC3-setting: DV recording mode:
LinkWenn du vorallem auf die horizontalen Linien im Testbild achtest siehst du das HDV zu DV der beste Weg ist für eine Wiedergabe bei einem normalen PAL-Television, trotzdem gibt es noch sicher par Verluste aber es entspricht locker noch in etwa dem Pana 3CCD-GS-Nivou wenn du es with diesem Vergleichst (Pana GS200) :
Link (Source: http://www.videomax.ru)
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
You then films are qualitatively s.besten HDV to DV conversion mode or SD format, otherwise there's nothing to the video then shows the HC3 as a normal DV (720 x 576).
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
the video shows the HC3, then as a normal DV (720 x 576) Anamorphic or letterbox?
KDS
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
the video shows the HC3, then as a normal DV (720 x 576)
Anamorphic or letterbox?
KDS Since I am stumped, is find out, perhaps because:
http://pdf.crse.com/manuals/2661356321.pdf
Antwort von ruessel:
Anamorph ...... the HC1 / 3 indeed have a true 16:9 chip. The HDV Picture in HC1 runterskaliert brings in daylight shots about the sharpness of a Canon XL2, I've mixed the two materials in a movie. Only the colors are different and need to necessarily be adjusted.
Before I'm going to beat: Yes, the XL2 has beautiful Distortion Lenses and the HC3 is there more of a glass of cucumber.
Antwort von Nightfly!:
... Before I'm going to beat: Yes, the XL2 has beautiful Distortion Lenses and the HC3 is there more of a glass of cucumber. And what with the HC1 synonymous cucumbers in your glass ?;-)) Comparison
Nightfly
Antwort von ruessel:
Compared to the Canonobjektiven synonymous (especially at wide angle is the HC1), a glass of cucumber. for example, the Canon Wide Anglealleine costs as much as the whole HC1 ....... very good and cheap do not exist.
Antwort von prem:
so isses - you must see the price.
XL2 is ne geile cam, but big, heavy and soooo good to see the images coming from the tape will not be synonymous again. The display is a fold-apart feht like a nonentity. The optics of Canon, of course, 1A, but the optics of the small cams are not synonymous with no IMO.
And, the XL2 provides good pictures only if you have time to about 100 parameters to adjust really synonymous to the situation towards. Who wants to shoot quickly in changing situations must use the default settings and then rausbekommen from the XL's nothing better than a little Panny or Sony.
:: Www.deepcode1.com::
sounds, vision, interaction
Antwort von cebros:
What I would consider synonymous: From the best SD pictures will never be HD ...
Regards
Cebros
Antwort von Monschilove:
So I am now synonymous with the question of buying the cam. As the picture quality and so next part, I'm already convinced that it has HDV because the shit. However, I have a problem with that for film editing and synonymous then the film intuition very expensive equipment and software must be purchased. No idea how long it takes for these devices are affordable for ordinary petrol. The Casablanca system could interest me for example, but is currently with around 3,000 EUR!! on the program. Find ich echt too fat. And then you get the movies not even burned to DVD in HDV format. If everything is already not so simple, but should be considered before the HDV Cam At length.
Antwort von PowerMac:
What is there for so unaffordable?
A Mac mini and FCE are available for under $ 1000 ...
