Frage von ph_glitsch:
Hello!
I have now a new HDV camcorder done (SonyHDR-FX7E). The first pictures are actually very nice, and despite my ancient PC, I could a movie together and cut him into. M2t format render!
To get the whole thing, but the Internet could be, I wanted the movie (2.5 GB) in 720p and in WMV format.
The result is bad: While the size shrunk to 500MB, but the colors are bad, everything is paler than before!
Why? Is the video format to blame? Can the s.falschen rendering settings are?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
how the colors
really look like, it is actually only on the national television or a well-calibrated monitor check. On my Belinea 19 "tube monitor I see the colors synonymous not so strong as later on the Television.
You can try the original material (. M2t, since nothing is actually rendered: This is the data that the camera has been provided) of the FX7 times to be directly (or rename in advance. Mpg, MPEG-2).
Between the part and the WMV file is likely not too large color differences. I just did with the material of the comparison made in the FX1, WMV is possibly a little "blockiger" because of the higher compression. If the compression is too high, may run fine nuances to surface. Perhaps
that is the case with you?
Otherwise - there are your first pictures - you need to probably get used to it that the Camera s.Werk may not be as gaudy
colors, such as cameras were adjusted in substantially lower price areas. The FX1 can even to date, depending on taste. That has - such a dealer - probably with the tastes of the American / Japanese customers to do it like the "candy" mag. So I found earlier analog Hours Fuji, Kodak & Co. as a film producer awful.
On the display s.der Camera I would not leave when it comes to color it.
Take a direct comparison, the agency or WMV to the internet and post the link. Both FX'e deliver a first class picture, because it really should not lie.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von ph_glitsch:
(. m2t, since nothing is actually rendered: This is the data that the camera has been provided Yes, but I have the film cut back to then synonymous same format rendered ...
Here 2 Comparison images (original and WMV):
http://phg.files-upload.com/89802/FX7_Format_Vergleich.zip.html
Besides the sharpness (but that is not the problem, because I know only in 720p output did) are the different colors! Throughout WMV movie, I am still s.uploaden (500 MB is unfortunately a little while) Document him but then post!
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
I've compared the images are viewed, so looks as if you control the contrast to the harsh Cons would have rotated. So apart of the expected slight blur surprised me das Could I have still not observed, except for DivX output from Studio 10.7. Since the picture is brighter than when playing the original.
No idea what might be to blame. How it looks from where the DVD was prepared for? I have not tried yet synonymous.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Sooo ... nunmal new top and brought my newly corrected statement of:
- I had the original material compared with DivX: DivX much slack Picture (themselves very well, but in direct comparison but "colorless");
- I had claimed the träte with WMV for me not to. Since I had the result of the comparison with what I am currently in the studio in the timeline was.
This last assertion is right for me now as a false and negligently made back because: - The m2v I had the first attempt with NeroVision opened synonymous DivX and DivX visible because schnitt worse;
- WMV Comparison therefore showed no difference, because apparently already in the view in the editing program (Pinnacle Studio for me 10.7) the colors are distorted and not only for rendering!
Is there an explanation? Now I am completely stumped ... what happened to me has not yet been possible, was a comparison against m2v to wmv Xoro 8500, which is all that is to eat (device has temporarily made the vault). A "normal" DVD showed the way, the same muddy color.
Why is reduced in the editing program (and later in the issue) of the contrast? It is really a direct comparison clearly visible.
Confused,
Andreas
Antwort von ph_glitsch:
I have experimented synonymous something and found out the following:
My source material is 1080i
- To 720-25p WMV: pale colors
- WMV in 1080-50i: Faber correctly!
- In 1080-25p WMV: pale colors
- DV-AVI (720x576, 50i): true colors!
Now I have to try, whether in general the progressive format (synonymous in PAL) is worse ...
Antwort von ph_glitsch:
Now I have times a further attempt is made:
- MPEG2 -720 and 25p: well, the colors are correct, this is now the colors of the original (which was good even before that, logically, and I have not changed!) Suddenly ill !!!!!!!!!! !
NOW I'm totally speechless! That makes no sense now really more ....
Hmm .... So much then for me to say the following:
when I use the AVI movie (which has so far always been) in Media Player and then open the. m2t movie in VLC Player and go so are the colors in the second movie (in other words. m2t pale)
But if I ONLY the. M2t film open in VLC player then the colors again!
Perhaps, the only issue s.der (possible driver problems with my graphics card)
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
wenns would not be so sad, so I could laugh :-) I've installed VLC because of the snap shot function. The fact worked with Nero Showtime is not with the. M2v file.
Now I wanted to compare images produced once. M2v and then yesterday some of the muddy DVD ... Now colors are brilliant in
both formats as of the beginning s.im. m2v.
And now, Nero Showtime plays both formats really nice ... if only everything were so simple.
A slightly confused
Andreas
