Frage von padrino:
Dear Video Professional!
My name is Sebastian and I have a very important question:
Some group of young people in our town would like to start a project. We are funded to the members of our congregation (church). There were different opinions and the Committee of Council has TV should know, and wanted 2 JVC GY HD100 and 1 JVC HD 101 purchase. Now some of us are of the opinion that this is not necessarily a great device and we from the price-performance ratio since what else can buy.
The cams are used for the following purposes:
Spokesman film from different perspectives, room scenes
Concerts, plays
Shows (cooking show, science programs)
Nature-and Culture clips
Most parcels are synonymous and streamed online for download. Some of the items are s.eine foreign TV station via Digisat broadcasts. And much is synonymous burned to DVD.
It was given to us of a company in Germany for the above mentioned cameras an offer of 12,000 euros (Virgin) done.
Well, we are looking for the right professionals think of what Cam would be used as an alternative. price 2,800 - 4,000 per cam. HD would be desired. Well, I have a Canon XHA1 HD seen, the configuration seems to be equivalent, even HDV / DV in / out and an image Stabilization, and 20x zoom. cut with Avid.
We are the strong opinions ... we need professional help:)
What are the disadvantages of the JVC? The above Canon?
I have read the instructions and especially the comparison of camera Slashcam read (great work), but lacks a test of the JVC, so I ask here again.
We would need the Tripods s.Kopf have a remote control. The Canon has the top price of about 3,400 already have a wireless remote control included, which is good for what? Manual Focus, sharpness and color play a large role.
What advice do you have? What other camera can you recommend? SonyHDR-FX1E? This does only 12x zoom. Otherwise what?
Thanks in advance!
Greetings from Austria, Sebastian.
Antwort von Frank B.:
Hi Sebastian,
Euro problems, I would have! I myself worked synonymous in various churches with children and adolescents. My budget for acquisitions and various events in the community per year, around 300, - Euro (East Germany). ;)
Even if I so much money available would be like you, I would probably bake smaller buns. But so be it.
The uses that you angiebst principle does not necessarily require HDV recording. For Internet streaming and DVD productions are certainly good DV camcorder. For television broadcasts, the matter differently. As would be necessary to ascertain whether the sender that your supplies in the near future HDTV commercials.
Maybe do you want so synonymous only to future developments ahead. But synonymous because you can considerably lower than the 12000, - Euro to stay.
Even with the Dir of being considered Canon XH A1. As you come in three Cams (gulp!) In 9500, - Euro. Everything I have on the research part, is all about doubt. You can here in the forum synonymous read a lot about this. Camera s.dieser One advantage is that you have the presets of a camera to the other over it. This is often half the battle in the compilation of a number of camera settings. Whether the JVC may, I do not know!
Maybe you can so your donors to convince the rest of 2500 Euro für nen good cause to donate;).
I myself have looked at the SonyFX recently purchased 1 private. It was shortly before Christmas on the internet for under 2700, - euro. She is currently regulated by the competition for the Canon XH A1 and the FX 7 from their own home under powerful pressure on prices. I am very satisfied. I have the Canon preferred because they are about 500 euros cheaper and the FX was 7, because in contrast to this 1 / 3 inch chips.
Greetings and Happy Creating Frank
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Sebastian,
if you have three experts for their opinion ask which HD (V)-the format is correct, then at least you get four different answers. ;-)
JVC cameras in the building HDV1 format, the frames and a Resolutionvon delivers 720 lines. Other Manufacturer, usSonyand Canon camcorder built in HDV2 format, with the fields and the 1080 Aufösung come along. Again, some devices (less than more professional HDV HD format) can be both synonymous, ie 720p and 1080i.
The Resolutionist but sooo not crucial, as the report "vs. 720p. 1080i" on
Antwort von padrino:
Hey!
Thanks you two!
@ Frank: bez. Donations: donation, we collect each week for specific projects;)
However, this budget is purely for the video system of thought:)
So has the Canon's me honest synonymous satisfy the FX1 synonymous, but we need the XLR ins, as all our mics have XLR sockets.
Are there still konkurruerbare alternatives? as you rightly said the Committee would like to have something "for the future" are synonymous, so they actually XM2s stored. We have until now worked with XL1en, however, belonged to a church member, who they now need. It is better to its own devices to have;)
Please to correct the following statements:
Even if one with the JVC HD HD100/101 in the non-recording mode, you have 40% better pictures can vote? What I've read so far, stores in a JVC ProHD format, while the other has A1 4 * grrr * of the TV station we were told that JVC is recommended, it may be with the format have to do?
what do you think really of the lenses?
in the JVC, it is interchangeable, it is of the firm Fujinon, knows the jmd of you? To use? : P
Canon has its own productions, the fluorite-coated, but not interchangeable. Synonymous've read that when the A1 at 20x image errors are rare, can someone confirm me?
@ Mark: thanks for the clarification, it is certainly difficult. But that is precisely why I would like to seek many opinions, and then before the committee show.
The camcorder is Comparison of the A1 in resolution:
HDV 1440 x 1080/25F
but that is not progressive, right? what does the F? i, is obvious to me.
mfg, sebastian
PLEASE NOTE CORRECTION: Sorry, at the 3rd Kamer is the HD111, and not the HD101
Antwort von Johannes:
To my knowledge, the PD of modele Sonyxlr
and to Xls s.man xlr adapter to buy.
And one way or you can go to any of cam xlr adapter
Beachteak or as a hot buy.
John
Antwort von wolfgang:
The Resolutionist but sooo not crucial, as the report "vs. 720p. 1080i" on
Antwort von padrino:
HHM, the HD200 sounds pretty good, just as what I've found on the Internet, unfortunately, beyond our budget to 3-4.000 euros (unfortunately ...
Antwort von Frank B.:
Hello again,
So the XLR - Connections were my choice secondary camera, because I, for example, concerts eh external audio recording. For the money saved for a FX 1 compared to the A1, you can have a proper opportunity for audio recording purchase, let alone the savings in total, with 3 cameras. However, the A1 towards the FX 1, there are many other advantages, for some professionals may be crucial. However, I am not a professional, so the FX 1 is certainly rich.
For your questions about the JVC, I can not help you unfortunately. In the initial phase of this camcorder, I often picture of errors (shifts in the Picture?) Read. Possibly. Other forum participants will have more detail. Even if these errors in the newest models are still present.
Frank
Antwort von Markus:
In the initial phase of this camcorder, I often picture of errors (shifts in the Picture?) Read.
Here are two of the local discussions about this:
" Probleme with der JVC GY-HD100
" JVC GY-HD100 Test pictures
Antwort von Jan:
I do not know if the JVC is the right one, Wolfgang knows so well with s.Besten from. Stabilizer has the normal Fujinon Lens yes and not no AF. Canon has been so with only one stabilizer for the JVCs presented.
Have all the film halfway Semi Pro Camera practice around the vernünfitg to use? In several test reads one of the basic properties JVC good (well processed material, and many manual options) to s.Ende but comes in a very mixed picture out, so what with Canon and Sony HDV mitkommt not.
Canon A 1 is a real alternative, a device for relatively little money with seemingly impossible many settings. This is for the Normalo Filmer synonymous not easy to use, a large number of keys are wildly across the distributed Camera, for example, the white balance settings, a part of the bottom left corner - above the rest - not really thought through.
Also you can disable all functions can (handle) to the non-connoisseur will cause problems. This is synonymous for several other functions.
The man in the color temperature of 100 Kelvin steps can select manual is probably a minor sensation, which every professional is happy. Thus, in the form and in the price range previously unknown.
Also XLR (line or micro) and micro-door entrance with s.Bord control of 2 audio channels.
The XH A 1 must hold very intense study and adjust, then it is the right camera for you.
I with the movies with the HDR FX 7 on concerts and interviews, the darker slumber photograph to A 1, WW worse by 5 mm and the Tonaussteuerung only in the menu is possible, no XLR, speaks against you.
The 20x optical zoom, the very low power of the FX 7, hardly Lichtsmears (important for augenommenen light sources) used by the CMOS chips, some features are more or expanded (to FX 1) Peaking and zebra along, Peaking in three colors, and LCD viewfinders together (A 1 synonymous - FX 1 is not), the HDMI port for the speak zb 7th FX The CMOS FX 7 roars synonymous with small reinforcement less than the competition.
Almost the same Wide Anglewie FX A 1 then 1 - if the man with FX 7 disadvantages can not live without or with XLR halt Z 1
One has but to FX 7 & FX 1, especially for FX 7 / V 1 say many of the industry have been with SonyVX / PD series started filming or still. They are, in my opinion, 5-10 min immediately in the FX 7 / V 1 know, because many important buttons are right there where they were before - almost everyone will soon understand the Sonys and more importantly it is synonymous with in times of emergency Automatic.
The Sony's are very strong in automatic image - like the white balance of the FX / PD series when I have to make artificial agrees very often - I rarely make a pure manual as Canon earlier (XM 2 / XL 1)
VG
Jan
