Frage von snakenic:
Hello,
I carry with me the idea to switch to HDV. the camera model is the only clear cut yet. I work with Premiere Pro 1.5.1
I have just now tested as a Still Image in high Resolutionin an HDV 1080i project -25.00 fetched. All I wanted and then rendered it as. rausspielen avi. In the preview monitor sa premiere of the entire synonymous still good.
So File / export / Film
Then, under Export Settings Microsoft DV AVI,
under Video / Compressor: DV (PAL)
Pixel Seitenverhälniss: D1 / DV PAL Widescreen 16:9
Data maintained.
After export times viewed in Media Player and frightened. No trace of sharpness. Everything as if it was compressed. (Is it indeed probably synonymous), since I really only produced for DVD AVI is very important for me.
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you
Antwort von domain:
What would you do exactly the same way as when one professional with a Hasselblad camera would produce passport photos.
Why you interested in HDV at all, if you are the high Resolutionim afterwards returned to conventional low-resolution video herunterrechnen it? There are lots of pixel lost, simply said.
Antwort von snakenic:
Is it clear to me. But how do you get quality HDV to DVD?
Antwort von Ficeduld:
Huh? HDV 1080i -25.00? 1080i is always 50
On a DVD do you no HD quality, by definition!
For HD: Blu Ray
Gruss
F.
Antwort von snakenic:
The heist, if I want to produce for DVD, it is a priori s.besten of 16:9 SD to work? Just what the whole HDV if you do not the masses via DVD can show?
Antwort von domain:
Because it is the masses have not really arrived.
In addition, I recommend you to http://videotreffpunkt.com/ single, which have very early following with HDV and HD formats employed.
Antwort von Ficeduld:
You can HDV the masses, for example on Vimeo show.
Also you have with your HDV material in high resolution, can thus synonymous in the future, higher-resolution things.
And furthermore provides HDV mpeg2 downconvertiert on DVD in my eyes great, better than subjectively of my Pana 3CCD SD Cam.
Gruss
Antwort von WideScreen:
So File / export / Film
Then, under Export Settings Microsoft DV AVI,
under Video / Compressor: DV (PAL)
Pixel Seitenverhälniss: D1 / DV PAL Widescreen 16:9
Data maintained.
After export times viewed in Media Player and frightened. The thing you've spent there, is again just so that DV and SD-quality.
You must be off at:
Microsoft HDV, AVI,
Video / Compressor: HDV
, but this may be that your premiere 1.5 still can not do? Because now I'm not so sure.
Only then would you describe the picture in "HD" look.
Greeting
Antwort von masterseb:
pal is a video that consists of HDV compressed but looks 10 times better than a sd video, provided it was in the high quality expected.
s.besten is to premiere directly from the media encoder on a HQ dvd to mpeg file, which can then each read dvd authoring program and import it. then the HDV format directly, without the compressor between on pal brought. I commend you, anyway premiere pro 2, since that was screwed s.media encoder.
alternative: as a high quality in HDV and then rausrechnen zb. with nero or toast can compress video to a dvd project.
otherwise you can only online HDV or publish data dvd. BluRay coming sooner or later. there is synonymous dvd player to play divx of usb stick or dvd: could be synonymous with a HQ HDV divx file and so on to create a beamer or TV show.
Antwort von Meggs:
pal is a video that consists of HDV compressed but looks 10 times better than a sd video, provided it was in the high quality expected.
The first is a rumor, and secondly, a little meaningful generalization.
Thus it would be calculated down HDV - video of the cheapest HD camcorder is better than what a pro SD camcorder delivers.
True, of course not.
Antwort von Axel:
pal is a video that consists of HDV compressed but looks 10 times better than a sd video, provided it was in the high quality expected.
The first is a rumor, and secondly, a little meaningful generalization.
Thus it would be calculated down HDV - video of the cheapest HD camcorder is better than what a pro SD camcorder delivers.
True, of course not. No, but it is indeed the HDV workflow> DVD, and there is, to the confusion to an end,
always better to complete the project in HD and then to cut down to convert to SD DVD. "10 times better" than I do now in visibly better, "a sufficient reason, with an HDV Cam SD not to cut, as the thread starter probably from the first replies had closed:
The heist, if I want to produce for DVD, it is a priori s.besten of 16:9 SD to work? Just what the whole HDV if you do not the masses via DVD can show? EDIT: I know that there are other reasons can be cut in SD:
1. A mixed project, a second cam is DV. Then I would still be record HDV, but then cut in SD.
2. I would like the material scale. Then I with HDV video in an SD timeline still reserves.
But the confused here, perhaps only.
