Frage von mreko:
When I filmed with a HC1 HDV material in nero dvd architect4.0 or a widescreen dvd (704x576) down code, I have the problem that if I have the dvd on the pc look at the picture blurred pans / blurred wird.synonymous letterbox changes nothing. if I have the dvd on the tv at all razor sharp. no unschärfe, 1a bild!
synonymous if I m2t files with the vlc player on the pc look at the picture pans by far not as bad as the dvd version.
when purchased at pans dvds on the pc not synonymous unschärfe to see ...
what is this?
thank you very much
Antwort von mreko:
so, I am now a couple of dvds bought the mpg files with the vlc player viewed. it does not streak like interlace my footage (from deinterlace).
when I render my movies progressive, then I is full, the sharper, but the swivel Jerkiness.
How do I get my shots so as to buy dvd's? So of the qualitative, not from the look:)
Antwort von luli:
hmmm ... no one has ne dvd squeeze approved? have the know how to ne dvd properly prepared, that they both on the pc as synonymous to the tv looks good.
Thank you
Antwort von grovel:
It is quite simple: The purchased DVDs are not even recorded interlaced. You will NEVER be with a deinterlacer achieve the same result as 25p, 24p production.
This has the presses with nothing to do. And if the PAL M2Ts s.PC look better than the resulting DVD, then this means only one thing, namely that in a one (better) deinterlacer is used.
SeeYa Groveler
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Seems to me a field order to be a problem ...
Antwort von mreko:
thanks for the reply!
I have 2 dvd's completely with the FX1 was filmed. these are seemingly synonymous progressive. it can not lie ... but I still have the same problem if I deinterlace videos, jerky video on the dvd. reinterlaced of the tv dvd player dvds actually bought back, or how does it work?
the field order, I turned synonymous, is exactly the same problem with the swing.
someone still has ne idea why this may be? Thank you!
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Completely with the FX1 was filmed. these are seemingly synonymous progressive. it can not lie ... (...) The FX1 is always interlaced on. And the picture is interlaced changed. Unless you are standing on the drug-feeling with 1/25s.
On PCs, these DVDs are almost always bad. Unless the software player deinterlaced. Thus you have to accept. What evaluation has more viewers? TV or PC? The winner wins.:)
Antwort von Anfester:
The winner wins.:) or logical?
Antwort von mrecko:
is already clear to me that the FX1 interlaced recording. just me wondering why the dvd, with the FX1 filmed, is progressive (ie deinterlaced was) and not jerky.
if my persuasive deinterlace HC1 (sony vegas 7, interpolate fields) is jerky ...
