Frage von BamBam:
Hello All
Problems with RAM when rendering of the finished film.
Calculator:
3 GB RAM (XP only recognizes 2 GB)
Intel Core 2Duo (2.4 GHz)
12 GB free hard disk (C:)
Files:
two film files as. wmv (both only about 2 minutes, and only about 40 MB big)
image as a title. JPG (to 8 sec in length)
(Resolution / format of the two movies and the jpg file is full HD, so 1920x1080 pixl)
Whole composition is then about 5 minutes.
So pull down all, fits hinschieben, three levels and as "Windows Media (. wma) rausrendern.
I always get the following error message:
Have already found about a contribution and have tried the following settings, but nothing helped.
Prefrences> Memory & Cache:
Maximum Memory Usage: 120%
Maximum RAM Cache Size: 95% (60% of I to 95% increase)
Maximum Disk Cache Size: 5000MB (2000MB of I increased to 5000)
anything from "Media Cache Coformed" I read the paths (Database and cache) as they are.
Packt AFX not 5 minutes rauszurendern? or do not pack my notebook?
The. Wmv movies were originally conceived as a BMP sequences (1920x1080) which I easily than. Wmv rausrendern could! So no problems with the high resolution.
This turnkey / rausgeränderten. Wmv will again be processed in AFX, AFX and this creates is not without error rauszurendern above.
How do I use the memory problem! s.Calculator can not lie! in only 5 min. film ... What can I even try / Switch.
Antwort von BamBam:
sorry, forgot to write this message:
After Effects AEGP PlugIn PlugIn Media IO:
MediaIO2 error: 0x4
Not enough to complete this meomory encoding
Antwort von jasonc:
currently have the same problem (with 4GB RAM) --
must be a movie for the Resolution2556px/1440px MPG2 Render.
Unfortunately, it grabs the calculator only to 1950px wide, s.da comes Fehlermedlung following:
"MediaIO2 error: 0x400e004
"(5027 § 12)
"The frame dimensions are outside the bounds
've all sequences pre futile ...
arrrrr
pro's help! :)
Antwort von Mylenium:
must be a movie for the Resolution2556px/1440px MPG2 rendern.Leider grabs the calculator only to 1950px wide, What is s.der message did not seem to understand? Does not. Resolution bottle. If the specification for MPEG-II BluRay not provided with WMV and it should not be synonymous with no further, because the Redistributables synonymous merely to standard HD work.
Mylenium
Antwort von Mylenium:
How do I use the memory problem! s.Calculator can not lie! That probably not, but s.Windoof. WMV uses the same address space for compression and decompression, of which it is generally problematic. Logically, therefore, would be the first to recommend the whole thing again in a "neutral" format to convert ...
Mylenium
Antwort von jasonc:
must be a movie for the Resolution2556px/1440px MPG2 rendern.Leider grabs the calculator only to 1950px wide,
What is s.der message did not seem to understand? Does not. Resolution bottle. If the specification for MPEG-II BluRay not provided with WMV and it should not be synonymous with no further, because the Redistributables synonymous merely to standard HD work.
Mylenium Thanks for your reply.
It's not that I do not understand the error message, but I was not sure whether it might s.nur s.ram or s.setup is or not I> can encode hd.
Covered viell. gibts nen Tip for a workaround or another solution before I give out the part.
tnhx, jason
Antwort von Mylenium:
Covered viell. gibts nen Tip for a workaround or another solution before I give out the part. Yes clear. TMPEG with user specific settings and matrices. However, since "out of spec", synonymous here no guarantee that it's just synonymous somewhere is playable. If noch'n bissl stop until we UltraHD and 4k-Home Cinema and are sowas everything is standardized ... ;-)
Mylenium
Antwort von BamBam:
Thank you first s.All!
hi JasonC,
worked for me now rendering at 1920x1080 without error ... Memory!
Has seemingly less to do with memory (RAM), but with space on the Fesptlatte!
I have done the following:
C: hard drive for a further 42 UK cleared!
My film is not as rausgerenderte. Wmv file only 50 MB big, but the source data I have used BMP sequences (1920x1080) and have a size of 20 GB!
Previously I had only 12 GB free on C:, this seems not reached for the 20 GB Great source files AFX somewhere during the rendering on C: externalise tried.
That was the solution to my problem! At least for this time!
Good luck
BamBam
Antwort von BamBam:
hmmm works but only partially!
So spend the bmp sequences (Queldateien) as. Wmv AFX has made Easy!
But then these AFX issued. Wmv movie file unpacks it no longer!
So if I have to. Wmv file that I previously had spent AFX import and edit this and repeatedly. Wmv wants to spend, then comes back the memory message and rendering stops.
Of 20 seconds. Wmv, I can rausrendern (test samples), but not the 5 minutes. Wmv file!
It must be definitely on. Wmv format generally lie?
Has anyone experience with. Wmv files to AFX!?
Antwort von Mylenium:
It must be definitely on. Wmv format generally lie?
Has anyone experience with. Wmv files to AFX!? The better question is, however, if you ever need to work with WMV? Saturday afternoon here at the Conrad in Leipzig: external hard drive, Western Digital, 250GB, USB 2.0, 74, - Euros ... Wen NDIR to nix change, then I do not synonymous. ;-)
Mylenium
Antwort von BamBam:
@ Mylenium,
I understand what you want to say. It may not be true, which I for 5 minutes full HD movie 300 GB hard disk.
Similar would be the best quality or uncompressed AVI file.
Thus, I am about 70 gigabytes (GB) for only 5 minutes full HD (1920x1080) film. That is sick! Oh yes, and it can not even play properly! Regardless with whatever hardware! The 70 GB AVI rauszurendern there are "memory error".
The next best output possibilities was "Windows Media codec (. Wmv).
Really barely discernible loss of quality! Instead of 70 GB will be about 80 MG (megabytes), in full HD and perfectly playable! Therefore. Wmv
But I have to this. Wmv file back into AFX import and with only one already. Wmv file existing marry. And with this step-AFX is overwhelmed and says "Memroy not enough."
Is it now but still the memory meant, or space on the disk, or both!
Synonymous, I would be happy to try another codec! but should know what?
So 5 mins Full HD 200 MB should not exceed. And good quality, not as bad. Wmv
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) It may not be true, which I for 5 minutes full HD movie 300 GB hard disk. (...) There are nearly 32 GB for five minutes.
Antwort von BamBam:
I'm pretty sure that the file is about 3:20 minutes about 41 GB in size was. These I have deleted because not playable and Memory error when rendering in AFX. As mentioned above, is still a 2 minute part will be hanged on it (= more than 5 min), and this I have estimated at about 30 GB = 70 GB, to GB, it is not, but in any case too much!
I know more tomorrow, two options I have to try!
meld me again.
Antwort von Mylenium:
I understand what you want to say. It may not be true, which I for 5 minutes full HD movie 300 GB hard disk. But Mööönsch, wilt thou now do video editing or not? Sorry, this is kindergarten howling. Even if you maybe something else in mind: To sowas still belongs and when hardware prices are decent big hard now not an issue really. Really - if you perhaps Aldi with your calculator and rumfitzelst're not prepared, this step, you should perhaps seek a different hobby. I know that now sounds alels terribly common, but überleg but check out what the stuff before 3,4,5 years has cost you and what options, in contrast, are open today ...
Mylenium
Antwort von BamBam:
It is a notebook Compaq 8710w workstation with 3 GB RAM, 2 x Corel Duo 2.4 GHz (about 2000, - ¬) (This is our weakest Calculator!)
Info:
Uncompressed AVI (full HD), only with Jerkiness playable! Tested on workstation with 8 GB of RAM and 4 CPU's and a graphics card alone 2500, - ¬ costs (Quadro FX 5600)!
So much for equipment.
Unfortunately, we AFX only on the notebook and not on the 8 GB workstation ...
If rausstellen, which makes it hard s.zu little memory, I'll kiss your feet! ;-)
Meld me again ... I almost s.Ziel ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
Uncompressed HD is around 110 MB / s. The hard drive can not play alone. So it jerky. Not because of the graphics card. Very much you have no idea, right?
Bit capture, I think.
Antwort von BamBam:
@ PowerMac, so you have a problem! where is it on the forum because?
Such comments make me happy is synonymous with the forum ...
Sure, the est. of the hard drive makes it, I went up only of the presentation frequency of the graphics card from.
Mylenium should only fitting and I `ll maybe give another tip.
Anyway, as always synonymous ...
can you help me? you seem good bets! :-) (Späschen)
regards
BamBam
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) When I let such comments like it synonymous with the forum ... (...) Is that a threat?
Antwort von BamBam:
Of course not.
But such answer, the idea was already there, whether I am here next without such "idea person, go learn .." - can post replies. Sounds like it to None.
The last two renderings have worked perfectly. If the solution of the problem permanently confirm I will post it here!
@ PowerMac, Forum, we remain friends.
Regards
BamBam
