Frage von Blinx:
Hi,
My Praktica DVC 5.1 HD, I had sold again because the LowLight behave catastrophically bad was now clear to me is the quality probably significantly more than pay 180eur.
I have two in Sight camcorder, the Canon HF10 (16GB) and the JVC GZ-HD30EX (80GB hard drive)
Both devices seem so good to have LowLight properties or at least better than how cheap a la Aiptek cams.
I tend to JVC because of the large memory, however, I am concerned because it has a HDD and has no flash. The camcorder may be on a roadtrip with nature to be synonymous and should therefore vibrations in a car to endure!
Has anyone here experience with the reliability of JVC HDD camcorders?
In addition, the JVC already for about 450-480eur to acquire. The HF10 is more expensive, but it has an optical Image Stabilization, the JVC only electronical my Praktica garkeinen had and I want to do again garkeinen case.
How big are the differences between the stabilizers?
Like watching in general with the picture quality from the Comparison?
What is actually with the Canon "cine" mode aufsich? Is this the picture or otherwise, only the frame rate reduced?
I hope you find who has experience with both of his mustard to give: P
Antwort von deti:
I would give you one guess HF100. The surcharge for the internal flash memory for the HF10 is not worth the money. The JVC cameras are cheaper, but not synonymous better than the comparable series for Canon.
In terms of Image Stabilization, autofocus and image sharpness of the edges has a Canon ahead.
Deti
Antwort von domain:
I hope you find who has experience with both of his mustard to give: P That with the mustard will be difficult, who buys a two Amateurfurzkameras (PowerMac quote) at the same time, then a council to be able to?
Is it really just the camera itself, or possibly synonymous to subsequent film editing?
Hast thou therefore the entire processing chain to the final product, taking into account the power of your PC, your NLE software and playback of your intended procedure in the Purchaseüberlegungen introduced?
Antwort von Blinx:
As I understand it is the MPEG2-TS format is not as resource intensive as AVCHD, to cut, I will probably still have a 4 core processor need.
On the one Page offers JVC yes but then the 80GB is really final, and the material on the laptop should be transferred.
In the HF10 or the HF100 is always expandable but then goes into too much synonymous Money.
with the software I was already a little involved, have Edius 5 and Sony Vegas 8 per s.Start. But rather the things I do worry if it should prove that I ever was with any useful return. : P
Antwort von domain:
Even with 4 cores you will not have any comfortable AVCHD editing and reach 80 GB, you must first bring together on holiday. If the times but with mpeg2 full should it is quite fast with the next 16 GB microSDHC cards in the AVCHD HD-30, flash memory, you synonymous in your mobile phone can use.
