Frage von schlaflos011:
http://www.vimeo.com/1559407
filmed with:
Canon HV20
Raynox DCR-250
Your opinions on my first Rohschnittversuch would be interested in me.
lg from Austria
Antwort von domain:
As a video, you can your work actually not judge because there is none.
I can only be a sequence of photos that are synonymous in part are very good. Why hast thou for these recordings actually used a video camera? Since moving in the wind, no leaves, no light, no krabbelndes insect ... (or spins my internet PC when you play?)
Interesting are the pictures of the thriving wine, because it is widely unknown, as this really spectacular blooms.
Antwort von schlaflos011:
Actually there are only 5-6 pictures where you can not (or almost no) movement can recognize.
What it says on the quality of the recordings?
Antwort von domain:
What do you want to see us with these pictures really say?
That macro shots, with no preference which made Camera, times must be sharp anyway, so they are herzeigbar ever, it is self-evident.
I understand the message of the image sequence is not easy. Plums are synonymous grow ever more mature and they are synonymous change in the color, just like apples.
Where are the people who prune vines, which are time lapse recordings, where the light is, where is humor, action, where are the emotions that a film should actually raise it unless it would be purely scientific, but there should then have a profound comment to be with.
Antwort von Jake the rake:
I think Mr. Schlaflos has prompted criticism constructive. Sequence of photos? Tomatoes on the eyes;)? So for the first time I must say the video is really not bad.
Clearly a little more life to the whole would not hurt, but who has time for that?
Recording quality is consistently good (with the sharpness is such a thing with your Equipement probably not as good style is). The Farbkontinuität is in order.
Antwort von domain:
I have directly or indirectly, our Schlaflos011 enough constructive criticism and suggestions.
I can very well imagine with how much rigor, commitment and time spent Schlaflos the recordings made from solid tripod made and was anxious that no atmospheric disturbance and certainly not a man and not an insect, the purity of his recordings should interfere.
However, from my point of view is completely touching video s.einem over, unless one makes such pictures only for himself and has his fun.
Antwort von schlaflos011:
With all due respect prefer "domain" but I see in your two papers only "indirect constructive criticism". (what you always synonymous including understadn)
These recordings are a small part of a movie about a young winemakers in Austria, which I join in its activities. The year of the grapes will be a part of it with about 2 minutes (probably less) in length. This is not film, but a sequence, the development of the grapes are, I do not require extra mention. (yes you can see)
The emotion, the sweat of hard work, insects (pests has vine leaves nothing to be lost) interviews, cozy wine drinking, visiting groups, Vinum, your requested Lichtspiel come so naturally in the overall film sufficeth before.
What I came here: I think the majority of macro shots with the HV20 has succeeded and was very ecstatic the whole thing on a FULL-HD projector to be seen.
Criticism is now focused on the cut, the color correction, settings, zoom, pan ... I would be desired. Jake The Rake: Thank you for understanding.
IN VINO VERITAS
sleepless
Antwort von domain:
Yes of course, then this is something quite andreas.
But perhaps you would have instead: "Your opinions on my first Rohschnittversuch would be interested in me." ev should write: "Here are some selected test recordings with the HV20 and lens but without O-Sound" ;-))
