Frage von darklord77:
Hello,
I have the HV20 can test and would like to see this growth. I read the less manual controls HV30 over the HV20 features. Is that correct?
Manual adjustments of Weisabgleich etc. I would be very important.
What does that tell you about this?
Antwort von Markus:
... I have the HV20 can test and would like to see this growth. I read the less manual controls HV30 over the HV20 features. Is that correct?
Manual adjustments of Weisabgleich etc. I would be very important. And what speaks against it, the HV20 to take?
Antwort von darklord77:
The look of the HV30 I like better.
Of course, this is not the most important, but if the HV30 otherwise control all of the HV20 has then I would prefer to take the HV30.
Antwort von Jan:
You get the HV 20 on still?
If a dealer is, with Europe the product, you get the purchase of a HV 30 or $ 100 extra cash back of Canon back.
When HV 30 lacks nothing for HV 20 in cases of manual controls.
No, the aufgerauhte surface, the improved internal microphone frequency response (less Lufwerksgeräusche), the broader Zoomwippe and improves the LCD are even more advantages of the 30th AGM
Clearly visible defects (excluding wild tests with 5-10x magnification) exists between the two models are not.
VG
Jan
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
At the HV 30 but was fudged!
And what is better?
Pretty much did nothing.
Ever read about that sound worse?
I do not drive noises dei are no longer so extreme.
In the last Magazine (mir fällt grad is not a name) is an article like this there.
Will post it tomorrow times.
Antwort von raymaker:
The Zoomwippe like most probably not the internal sound is in fact slightly worse - but by external Micro obsolete anyway.
Besides black and slightly better-read LCD absolutely nothing else. There had reason why almost all of the 20 remained.
Antwort von peha:
The internal sound is in fact slightly worse - but by external Micro obsolete anyway. Since not the frequency response of the microphone, but the internal M-amplifier has been pruned, the effect of the deterioration synonymous with the use of external microphones!
In the last Magazine (mir fällt grad is not a name) is an article like this there. http://videofilmen.schiele-schoen.de/113/12745/vf20804038/Raritaet_in_Schwarz_Canon_HV30.html
Gruss
Peter
Antwort von Jan:
Video Active at the two models had the same where Endnote.
It was noted that the response has been trimmed, but now the drive is less noise pervade. What worse is that anyone can decide for himself.
I have the HV 30 sold well - and never before! a model must take back. So bad, it can be synonymous not be, the owners are often normal with filmmakers Durchschnittshörvermögen without wild tonte.
VG
Jan
Antwort von peha:
It was noted that the response has been trimmed, but now the drive is less noise pervade. What worse is that anyone can decide for himself. Yes, but at the GM 20 can be the lack of an external micro will be corrected in the HV 30 NO.
Gruss
Peter
Antwort von Daigoro:
It was noted that the response has been trimmed, but now the drive is less noise pervade. What worse is that anyone can decide for himself.
Yes, but at the GM 20 can be the lack of an external micro will be corrected in the HV 30 NO.
Gruss
Peter So on the whole "parents filming their small" events, which I'm rumhängen While there's a variety of cameras, but I've still not seen with external Micro.
For my good sound events is irrelevant anyway - there is only Atmo recorded. The inappropriate comments from the last series, although sometimes annoying, but not synonymous pain when the Gela Strategiegespraeche or the opponent can then nachanalysieren schoen. : D
Mirco we really only at seminars, where the things in between the coach explained it well should be.
If you really seriously want to film a concert (only with who makes a high quality and consumer equipment already seriously), I would completely synonymous external Tonequipment take (and know enough musicians Tonfuzzis with appropriate equipment, the beer for almost everything to do) and about the sound's Picture represent.
Antwort von darklord77:
So it should be so moderations. This means of course the sound is extremely important. I work then of course one way or another with an external Micro and preamplifier.
The best picture brings a nondescript when the sound is bad!
And the sound of the internal microphone on the HV20 is not really good. But as I said, because I always with external audio equipment is obsolete work.
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
It was noted that the response has been trimmed, but now the drive is less noise pervade. What worse is that anyone can decide for himself.
Yes, but at the GM 20 can be the lack of an external micro will be corrected in the HV 30 NO.
Gruss
Peter it is!
Antwort von Jan:
How bad can it not be, otherwise I would have a 100% customer Camera brought back - it came back None. And believe me, there are customers, which is currently often the case with Kodak and Casio digicams start the case.
I believe there is only a separate test darklord77 - yes you have 14 days right of return. I can assure you eh, of the 50 extremely Negatief HV 30 freaks have about 2 people who really HV 30 has had in his hand - the rest blabbert after.
I will not exclude that the HV 30 you may not be rich.
VG
Jan
Antwort von ruessel:
I can assure you eh, of the 50 extremely Negatief HV 30 freaks have about 2 people who really HV 30 has had in his hand - the rest blabbert after. So I see the synonymous, I own both cameras and have a long time ago a (TON) tests done:
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=6341
Antwort von Jan:
How bad is the trunk - in a few words?
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
I've got me for your time to test for the video forum - thanks!
VG
Jan
Antwort von ruessel:
Unfortunately, I have the sounds before the days of my server made, but there was no difference whether HV20 or HV30 on ext. Toneingang to hear!
