Frage von scrooge:
Salü together
In his video blog has Wolfgang Winne times nachgetestet detail whether the Microphone frequency response of the Canon HV30 (HV20 in Gegesnatz to) was actually cut. Felix Buckstegge had written that the Canon had made to the recording of unwanted drive noises to a minimum.
Here you can read Wolfgang's test:
http://www.fxsupport.de/blog/07_08.html
Wolfgang Conclusion:
"It is a myth that the HV30 synonymous s.externen Toneingang cut in an external Microphone s.der So HV30 makes any sense."
Now we have two opinions. Did Felix and Wolfgang except maybe someone times tested, as the microphone input of the HV30 in direct comparison with the HV20 camcorders or other makes?
Greeting
Hartmut
Antwort von Jitter:
Find it easy out.
Connect one and the same external Microphone successively with the HV 20 and the 30th AGM Say each of the same text with approximately the same Lautsrärke. Both manual with the same level disqualify.
Then betrayal us if you have at the high frequencies hear a difference.
Antwort von scrooge:
I would like to do when I next to the HV30 a HV20 would be synonymous.
And then I would have posted here is not synonymous ....
The question is therefore s.jemanden both in access.
