Frage von silversurfer11111:
Hi,
I need urgent help: For a seminar at my company, in which is synonymous to the chief to be present, shall I get three cameras, with which the participants a way to turn diary (interviews, but synonymous sales situations, lectures, and the whole inside and outside ). The films - and that's the problem, but why do I need a certain quality - not only of our views, but should be synonymous over the Intranet and available to be regarded.
Because it must be louder lay s.Werk, the cameras should be possible to use idiot-proof and easy to carry. Professional equipment are not in question. And it should not cost too much synonymous.
I have now caught up with various lenders offers: All have advised me of HD, synonymous because of the cost.
One proposes the Panasonic GS180 (or alternatively, the Canon S100 Legria HF).
The other wants to give me a mix of Panasonic: NV-GS400, NV-GS180, NV-GS230 EG-S
Since I do not ever these cameras in the hands of the synonymous and technology had had no idea:
What would you take?
As I said: We do not need Hollywood picture quality, but since the material is to be published synonymous, it must still look good.
Which model is guaranteed s.ehesten? Or is HD is a must (most lenders do not have HD in Berlin in the program)?
Thank you!
Antwort von EightRocks:
How about with some Canon XM2 NEN?
But should still synonymous with some lying around.
Switching and good.
Antwort von marwie:
I would rather tend to HD, so much more expensive to rent that should be synonymous (not surprising that there are providers who do not have HD cameras in the offer). eg. The JVC GY-HM100 is quite small and is synonymous XLR inputs for external microphones. (If it allows the buget, I would also rent or radio microphones).
I would just look it in the interior do not get too dark, so possibly even extra light.
Tripod could harm not sure, but is just again a little less mobile and flexible.
Antwort von tommyb:
The image quality of HD runterskaliertem is much better than native SD.
Thus, the technical quality of the image would be secured before.
Antwort von Alf_300:
Video documentaries are the rage in the company - but mostly this is a shot in the oven, because neither party has yet cameraman exercise.
Then you should convince the boss that ran as pro's need
Antwort von silversurfer11111:
Thanks for the previous answers! However, my decision is now more difficult. Here the choice of the provider:
http://www.25p-berlin.de/index.php?sub=20&action=25p.products
More than 50 ¬ per day would cost the fun does not stop.
What do you think for example of the Panasonic HD SD1 for 39 ¬ / day?
Antwort von marwie:
The Panasonic does not seem to be bad: http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Panasonic-HDC-SD1EG.html#Einle
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
For something like enough so synonymous ne XL1, which is there to be had for ¬ 39.
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
If it is streamed, it must be HD not necessarily because we use - as it often so international customers want - synonymous SD, partly synonymous 16:9 instead of 4:3.
Antwort von Jan:
Hi,
I think the XL one for beginner filmmakers to be rather difficult bedienunbares device. The rental price is good.
If you exceed the 49 ¬ in no case would, I would take the DM XM second Relatively good SD pictures and fairly user-friendly.
are very important in any case, tripods, films not from the hand, and then with the camera almost shoulder XL 1 (although the opinions calling over her shoulder ability synonymous debates).
In rigor of course the Panasonic GS 500, as have the 180, 230 and 300 no manual record level, where you can sound even scrap times.
If one or the other has Filmed a loud or very soft body.
The GS 230 is synonymous not so good because the 16 / 9 mode is there without stabilizer, at tripod it would no preference.
Although within ten more for the TRV 900 is not synonymous to despise, at that time was synonymous not a cheap good camera. It will certainly crush these rather poor 16 / 9 mode, have filmed 4:3 (though dated) would be more comfortable with her.
The VX 2000 or better still my favorite, the PD 170 would be made for such things, because they can make synonymous with bad lit place for quality. Although the PD 170 is too large for your purposes again.
You will want to use before any XLR microphone, you delight s.der diversity or manual record in DVCAM.
Illuminate the room but good (if that is possible and necessary) but should just stands next to the very front are on the list, which no preference Camera s.end it is.
VG
January
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... What do you think for example of the Panasonic HD SD1 ... The SD1 refers to using AVCHD format, the question of cutting your possibilities raised: Do you have a powerful enough Calculator Plus software to edit the video at all?
For your end, one of the good old MiniDV cameras to be entirely sufficient. These devices such as the Canon XM2 or SonyTRV900 are synonymous of lay people to serve after a short introduction to some and they have a connection for external microphones. And that is very important for what you are planning: to include lectures and interviews with only the built in Micro Camera leads in 95% of cases no useful results.
Antwort von Kevinovicz:
Look here:
Antwort von Piers:
... synonymous with the Chief will be present, ..., r with which a diary should rotate the participants ... The movies ... should be considered synonymous over the Intranet and available.
Because it must be louder lay s.Werk .... And it should not cost too much synonymous.
What would you take?
As I said: We do not need Hollywood picture quality, but since the material is to be published synonymous, it must look good anyway.
OMG, I have the key "Key Facts" times bold to let this project fail with 99.9999% probability. The information given to include all mutually exclusive, there is nothing Getting Around in what may look synonymous only human, let alone learn something from it. Except maybe that the Chinese water torture is not synonymous nastier than to watch 2 hours of this material. Best knowledge will be s.end: cameras, to document more than grandma's birthday, have lost nothing in the hands of amateurs.
As a previous speaker remarked: Speech from the idea to the boss. I know, I know the boss is right and what he says is true, always. But after no more than "production", he is angry about his "great idea".
The problem is that is this: It is not about foolproof cameras, which are, in principle, now almost all Kams, mostly because the automatic modes work perfectly, the problem is the lay "cameraman". He'll never materialized thus bring a scene to record, so the experience reversible way. The material will consist of endless pan, zoom and the same old useless settings you only with everyone, all can put together all the greatest difficulty.
Without you, Silver Surfer, to want to personally offend alone shows this sentence ...
As I said: We do not need Hollywood picture quality, but since the material is to be published synonymous, it must still look good.
that this lack any basic understanding of the Project. Not necessarily out of your Page, for it was Cheffes idea.
If one tries to capture on video a situation, to then later in a logical order as a "film to present", the recording / output quality for the very last of what you are concerned must. The first and most important thought is always: what is recorded as. Filmmakers to write scripts for it, or at least clean shotlists, Professional EB-camera people have since long experience and have it in the blood, such as turning s.besten a situation in order to cut and later dissolved. THIS is the all, most important of all. And the "be your" camera people can never afford.
Therefore professionals agree or at least semi-professionals s.die Kams pulped, or the Project and to disclose the idea. This is now my tip out of practice and no ramblings from the high horse. I had the dubious pleasure of such a pointless collection of cut footage. And what shall I say, it was never made public, and not the failure of the cutter was s.einem ;-)
In addition, the Project has been cut through the endless orgies in post production so expensive that one could have been made synonymous Kamer right people and we would shorten the project duration by 70%.
