Frage von MartinEOS:
Dear Forum,
As already described, I have dared to start with an XL1S.
The "In-Lens" is super, but I lack the wide area. I film contributions to online magazines, there is a Personennahaufnahme sometimes quite important, without that I go to the telephoto range.
Due to my work as a photographer in the Canon EF Lenses system, I like the 16-35/2.8 L or synonymous that the 15 fish eye.
If I have understood correctly, then I must with the focal multiplied by a factor of 7.2. Thus most distinguished of these lenses for my requirement, right?
What would be the alternative ... the Wide Angleaus XL series or a converter?
How many more picture I have with the WW from the XL series?
How many more picture with the converter?
What makes grade quality from the converter? Where is the XL WW price?
What other alternatives are there yet ... perhaps a Lens of WW to telephoto - which is more than the WW-Lens Here?
Thank you in advance for your effort to help me ...
Gruss Martin
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Focal ... with the 7.2 multiplying factor. Thus most distinguished of these lenses for my request ... Exactly true: The EF adapter is ideal for telephoto, but unsuitable as a replacement wide.
... How many more picture I have with the WW from the XL series? ... What other alternatives are there yet ... A detailed overview of the XL-optics can be found under
www.dvinfo.net/canon/articles/article58.php
Wide intentions, there is fairly good example of the Century
www.schneideroptics.com
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von MartinEOS:
Which converter is recommended for then?
Essay or really just Schraubfilter?
Such as wide weitwinkel is - then it looks like with out distortion?
Martin
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Such as wide weitwinkel is - then it looks like with distortion from ... In the case of Century can be found on the website detailed information including comparison images. Practical experience so I did not because I'm not setting up XL.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von utan:
I can objectively ww-of canon highly recommended, even have it, but unfortunately no comparative to converters because I have never been in such a use had.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
Here you buy the WW 3.4 -10.2 mm from the XL series is good for the fine. This will be your new favorite lens :-)
The EF has Bernd K. absolutely right ... I only use it for surf photography in combination with its 70-200 L IS or its fixed 400 L IS.
! IMPORTANT ROHBUSTES monopod TRIPOD OR WARRANTY AS ADDITIONAL STABILITY!
The EF is synonymous with K. Macro stories well away, as with its 100mm 1.5 Zenit with 72 single diameter! (Schöner Tiefenschärfe Effect)
The EF K. roundabout is 350, - Euros, The WW about 500, - +, and the zenith get only s.einem Russian night-vision device that about 200, - costs. (But then need M42> Eos adapter ca 30 , -) all in the E bay to find.
Have fun and success
