Frage von Asjoker:
Hi,
I know the question nervt euch scho determined but it would be nice if you could answer me anyway.
So the difference is so loud Slashcam only the housing and the size difference of around 2 mm ....
My question, because I can not appreciate - is the housing really that much better? So you would pay for more? I get my filters to the noise it's not better ... it looks better and content is ... sound?
I just want to know how much the difference in your eyes is worth, because I can see myself badly. Would be very grateful for answers:)
LG
Asjoker
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... the housing is really so much better ... Wär natürlich helpful to know what you want to compare the HV30 ;-) If the HV20, then there are quite a few more differences than the casing.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Asjoker:
What? I'm really stupid to me to inform ...
Yes I did it with the HV20 compared ... there are still other differences? Significant?
Have now seen always wrong ... would be grateful for new teachings ...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... there are still other differences? ... Off the cuff, I can not say since I am such cameras are not interested in next, but just try the search function: The differences between the two are in my memory after several here in the forum have been enumerated.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Asjoker:
OK, habs actually found, in any event, thank you I've done it carefully ... would have escaped me but smooth.
Every interested in it:
Quote of Jan (Danke nochmal s.dieser body): [code: 1: be49b1da90] Canon has in the HV 30 (yes details are difficult to obtain - Canon HDV Video Professional trainer Mr Küppersbusch has some info on the rausgelassen roadshows at the presentation) its micro-lenses (there were s.der HV 20) further improved, a small micro-lens over each LED, which is now even more effective working.
The camera now needs less signal amplification and the same sensor is still a bit lichempfindlicher.
HV 30 is intended to be in black, now of higher value - and not just because black, but because the black aufgerauht is not so cheap as in the slippery 20th AGM
The LCD is a bit more synonymous in daylight and in adverse Einschauwinkeln. The Zoomwippe is synonymous a bit wider, but unfortunately not as nice as the Canon AVCHD HG 10th
Otherwise, there is nothing else big s.der HV 30 in Comparison to the 20th AGM [/ code: 1: be49b1da90]
So the improvements are really minimal, but I still stop me can not imagine how much light the HV30 is now. The rest is not really worth much more.
¬ 800 - ¬ 700 cash back for a new HV20 / 30
Used grad, I see it for 500 ¬ but with much doubt
Well I must thank you to decide if any:)
Antwort von raymaker:
With the Lichtempflindlichkeit This is hardly noticeable. Only after months of HV30-release had a HV20.com forum for the first time a difference between HV20 and HV30 Comparison of direct noticed.
Antwort von Asjoker:
Hello again,
Although I thought that now everything is clear but now I'm confused again.
Why stand in the Slashcam tests of the Canon HV20 & HV30 so many different things and why are there so many gaps? Even though I have much information, I'm still not a pro and so orentiere I often s.den "yellow things" to say, what s.dem Slashcam better than ever and because the HV20 outweighs very surprising. Now apart of the fields where in the HV30 is nothing (as is probably synonymous for some reason?) But for example, the White Balance can only be made autonomous in the HV30? Brauch not even enumerate the rest, so everyone can see - my only question is why are there so many differences?
I was just about to buy the HV30 as a friend said to be possibly even worse, or there is a lot of cars (for example, just WA) and less manual possible.
Would be nice if me again in the ways someone could soothe and reassure me that really can not be referred to the score:
[code: 1:10542 ee745] VERY SLIGHT improvement of luminous
Black-and aufgerautes housing
A ticker-LCD better
Rocker-wide (though I expect nothing in the pictures can be seen) [/ code: 1:10542 ee745]
Otherwise, no manual controls were removed? Nothing verschlechertert? Would be very grateful for a reply. Would synonymous Slashcam kind of team, a reason for the gaps / changes in the HV30 over the HV20 records. Would be very reassuring.
Danke schon mal
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Why stand in the Slashcam tests of the Canon HV20 & HV30 so many different things and why are there so many gaps ... The information in this database are unfortunately common with caution. Lad dir s.besten Canon downloaded the two manuals - there you'll find all the info s.zuverlässigsten what the cameras can.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Asjoker:
Thank you!
On the manual, I know why God has not yet come ... ^ ^, Even manual white balance is possible.
Still, this is too little info and I'm not pro enough UM100% time to say everything is equal. But when visiting synonymous with hv20.com is confirmed every time it's really NO changes except as previously mentioned.
Thanks again for the hint:)
Small side question - If I were a DOF adapter and it did a Lens, the focus so the lens (ring) relocated and I can of the Canon HV30 entirely forgotten right? Bin da grad s.informieren but would like to know vornweg, thank you:)
Antwort von Axel:
If I were a DOF adapter and it did a Lens, the focus so the lens (ring) relocated and I can of the Canon HV30 entirely forgotten right? Right.
Antwort von Asjoker:
* grins * thank you:)
