Frage von mickey:
While I have the whole SonyHDR-HC1 forum searches, but so far no exact answer to my question.
What is important to me: If I buy HC1 and with this in HDV quality movies and this material then in DV quality to bring the PC (for lack s.HD fitness). What has the material for a quality?
Which camera you can compare it? VX 2100?
Or should you do when you have such a plan, rather just a set VX 2100?
Advantage of HC1, however, that they prepared for the future would be.
Antwort von Pempi:
you do not have the exact answer you get is because you are not a specific question you asked.
to ask you first s.dich itself should make is: will you use your computer someday HD-ready or not.
DV qualified the coming of the HC1 is sufficiently good, but certainly not the top end of all DV cams. what do you want? test images of different cams? concretize your question again a little bit and you überleg especially what you want for yourself.
Antwort von mickey:
Then I specify my question times:
I have different calculator, the best HD is already tolerated
as synonymous, but I cut a lot of wishes, my laptop
with 1.6 GHz Dual Core, 1 GB RAM supposedly not suitable for HD.
Although I find that my laptop is faster than the 3.4 GHz with 1 GB RAM - synonymous with the cutting of DV material.
Eventually of course, my calculator HD compatible, since I did the HC-1 and now wants the finished product in July should be finished, I can safely say that until then I do not "Calculator Update" will make.
I just want to know whether one of the DV Picture HC-1 with the
a VX 2100 can compare. Is it about the same?
Is there somewhere a test picture of DV material to a HC-1?
Antwort von Ethan:
in HC1, the lowlight the vx2100
certainly not suggest otherwise should
in HDV bild be enough resources.
gruß cj
Antwort von HDVideot:
There was a few months ago take a Comparison in a video magazines, about the quality of DV conversion from HDV material via software. Alternatively, still remains the DV HDV Auspielung of material through the Camera.
In the last C't 02/2007 was also something that the HDV cameras because of "oversampling" (???) a top DV quality to have.
The wiederspricht but a few others have read the test, which has the quality of the DV HDVs not so great cut. Here, however, equally filmed in DV, that is NOT runterkonvertiert.
Maybe someone testing on hand?
Antwort von wolfgang:
The thing is actually quite simple. The down conversion of HDV to SD on the chips in the cameras is normally something even better than the high-end NLEs can. Is perhaps not quite for the FX1 - albeit synonymous there is good enough - but surely for HC1 and HC3.
The so obtained SD material is usually erste Sahne, it's good quality SD material, and in 16:9. With regard to the material Farbsampling offers even more directly than Beaarbietungsreserven filmed in SD material. Presumably because of the original 4:2:0 material requires higher material (which is synonymous only 4:2:0, but I am zuwenig theorists in this field in order to be able to explain).
What usually makes little sense, is when these devices with the same film in SD. You lose the device rather good compared with SD devices.
The main disadvantage in lowlight area - now, the VX2100 is in the area almost a legend, and in this area is certainly synonymous of the FX1 not be beaten. Although the FX1 HDV devices certainly still is a device which is quite good lowlight-properties. Is weakest here seems to HC1, the HC3 is a bit better.
These are the experiences with these devices. For empirical measurement data can be yes, the Resolutions of testing used, if you want.
Antwort von smokeonit:
Own the HC1 for one year and must say the synonymous DV is very good ... only low light performance is not so doll ... when little light there is always a lot of light for sure!
