Infoseite // How to ask your people if you filmed the shots are allowed to publish?

Frage von transsib:


Hi!

I wonder exactly how your approach if you filmed people of the right to want to publish the pictures? What does that tell you where? Do you do on a form to sign it or let your permission to speak into the camera?

Here in the forum I read only that the person filmed mandatory for your permission to publish must ask - I am however totally unclear how a letter or an oral question must be formulated so that the case law has hand and foot. Who, of the 3 sets in the Camera talked to, wants to sign something?

I thank you very much for your answers!

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von PowerMac:

Search! Who in the Camera somewhat replied auto agrees to a publication, unless he runs.



Antwort von Rene K:

I come with the camera to tell where I am and if I give him one, two questions that he answered with yes and here we go. (he is obviously in front of the camera prompted)



Antwort von streetbiker:

Hello!

Thank you for your answers! Although the issue here in the forum came up many times, the discussion never went on the details of practical implementation.

Since you are safe because that thing is so easy? It makes it perfectly interviewed for a difference, for what purpose and in what context the images are used. If the interview of the fisherman as a complement to the romantic private holiday movie, or serve as a contribution to the news about the ruthless dealings with nature? If the recordings only in the private environment, or a million views audience? Are the shots, perhaps even for a film production where one uses himself as Blödmann displayed again looks? (eg as in the movie Borat)

Is it because the legal situation be found somewhere? I am a little perplexed because this was the right keyword in Google.

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von PowerMac:

How difficult is now synonymous not:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recht_am_eigenen_Bild



Antwort von streetbiker:

Speaking of Borat:
En buddy of me said that had the most in the film with a hidden camera rotated. The fact that in "Verstehen Sie Spaß" no problem I have is white, but cinema is almost always on a film reel rotated (16mm, 32mm ..). How can so ne film camera to hide? There is already a problem as a part of the shoulders ... Or was the film "Borat" on garnicht Fimrollen recorded?



Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Anonymous" wrote: ... claims to have the most in the film with a hidden camera rotated.
I think rather less, since Borat and his crew come as news team or Filmmakers on. Since it is only natural that they have a camera with you, so no need to be hidden. However, this role has been driven as far, at least some "actor" on the true purpose of the recordings to deceive - and prompt the production of the publication has been so synonymous sued.

Gruß Bernd E.



Antwort von Schleichmichel:

Where is the problem?

zum Bild



Antwort von streetbiker:

"PowerMac" wrote: How difficult is now synonymous not:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recht_am_eigenen_Bild

I would rather say 'it is that simple now synonymous not' - I have quite the various forum posts and web pages known. Unfortunately, nowhere does it indicate in what form and to what extent we should get the approval.

After all, says the Art Copyright Act expressly states that it must determine whether and how their own picture to be published:

http://bundesrecht.juris.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

RA Prof. Dr. Klaus Sakowski of der Berufsakademie Heidenheim sagt dazu u. A.:

Quote: http://bundesrecht.juris.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

RA Prof. Dr. Klaus Sakowski of der Berufsakademie Heidenheim sagt dazu u. A.:

In general, however, is in the adoption of an implied or tacit consent caution. http://bundesrecht.juris.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

RA Prof. Dr. Klaus Sakowski of der Berufsakademie Heidenheim sagt dazu u. A.:



The statement that those who speak into a camera, an auto publication agrees, seems to me a little bit (very) risky.

I believe that legally only on the page is secure if the interviewee relatively detailed information on the use and dissemination of the medium of recordings shed - I am just unclear how extensive the education must be and how they formulated s.Besten is to ensure the interviewee not to vergraulen, but perfectly legal on the Page to be safe.

Gruß, Oliver [/ code]






Antwort von transsib:

Hmmm ... somehow I was no longer logged. The last contribution and with the 'greeting, Oliver' next signed up were of me.

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von Eva Maier:

Only yesterday was a contribution in the TV where the interviewees were partially verpixelt. So it can not hurt if you give it a permit.

/ E



Antwort von Wolfi.:

But if you just interviewed for the news and turns in the moment ne Omma runs in the background over which you have not synonymous but whether it agrees. I believe that if someone does not watch TV show he wants to say it myself. About something if one is filming a demonstration and in retrospect would have 1000 people interviewed, whether they agree. With these margins shows is of course something else, because this is about his own reputation. And with children this is something else again. Since parents must give consent. So I think if an adult citizen in front of the camera to a channel expresses anything, it is probably in retrospect, nothing against the broadcasting have, except he is one of the very nasty variety and what someone wants to press inside. I would because there is no risk.

If it is the right way must be the person to sign a form where all important information is explained. Look at www.rtl.de since I've ever seen such a form.



Antwort von transsib:

Hi!

"Wolfi". wrote: But if you just interviewed for the news and turns in the moment ne Omma runs in the background over which you have not synonymous but whether it agrees. I believe that if someone does not watch TV show he wants to say it myself. About something if one is filming a demonstration and in retrospect would have 1000 people interviewed, whether they agree. [...]

This is clearly regulated by law - who is not the main object is, for example, but coincidentally passing or running in the background can be seen, does not need to be asked to give its assent. The same is true for participants of public events such as demonstrations.

My question revolves primarily about how the agreement in detail properly and how far I interviewed in my intentions must inaugurate. Do I have to tell him whether the recordings for private or for commercial purposes? Do I tell him that I might report critically about him would be? Do I tell him if I got the pictures on television, on DVD or would like to publish on the Internet?

Hardly anyone will probably agree, if critical reports about him. For example, if a purchase of the DVD talking about, could fee claims, because the same interviewee to 'much money' thinks. And - what interviewee wants like a A4 Page with laws Blabla sign?

So - what wording gives the entire legal s.Picture of interviewees as comprehensively as possible and fairly safe, is also possible but harmless?

The Super-GAU would be (this variant affect me) a film released on the Internet, an interviewee acknowledges that it again says, 'This type of publication, I have not agreed to' reimburse display and asks for damages.

Deserves not a cent, but a thick processes + fine + damages s.Hals - congratulations! :-(

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von Eva Maier:

Sowas's should give ...
But I think just s.Live items (interview on the street) yes garnicht sowas would work if you only have to ask veröffentlichsgenehmigung.

(E



Antwort von PowerMac:

Honestly, it is futile to lament about. There are lots of legal and journalistic literature. In each book to the TV journalism, there is a chapter on interviews and what to consider. You prefer to purchase the necessary literature.



Antwort von transsib:

PowerMac Hello!

I am grateful of course, synonymous for your answers, if synonymous with me the impression that through ignorance you condescending statements about trying to play. Only you react next up on my precise question with a reference to the search and makes the bold assertion that are in the Camera replied auto publication agrees, then refer to Wikipedia and now this:

"PowerMac" wrote: Honestly, it is futile to lament about. There are lots of legal and journalistic literature. [...]

I do not know who is here lamented. I, and probably synonymous few others, would like to know how to get legal permission from the clean ones filmed picks. Very easy. How complicated can not be. It's as simple as you like of next above (who has agreed to film it) obviously not synonymous. So far I have come synonymous with no literature.

Have you even been there once synonymous purely seen or is there really only this one, questionable, simple sentence? What you recommend me literature specifically because on this issue?

So clear is your message to me anyway - if it is with the simple sentence is done, I need (at least for it) not literature. Is it not so easy, you obviously have no clue and your 'help' next up was probably not ...

Nothing for ungut - in fact I treat thread Answerer with kid gloves - Your now in the third post-content-poor and patronizing answers led me now but on this clear answer.

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von streetbiker:

Hi Olli,
You must look after him.
Who in a year and a half zwoeinhalbtausend posts here (and I certainly would not know where else) einhackt, has done too little time to adjust in order to take care of what they wish as a profession stating: Journalist

A pity that the filmmakers here allow, but this very informative forum of two or three people in lopsided bring it.

As regards your question, I can not directly help you, advise you, however, that with one editor of a prestigious (public law) in prison to contact him.
They have not only plan, but my amateur filmmakers always synonymous with Council helped.



Antwort von Nio:

"Eva Maier" wrote: Sowas's should give ...
But I think just s.Live items (interview on the street) yes garnicht sowas would work if you only have to ask veröffentlichsgenehmigung.

I recently NEN internship at the radio made me think that the legal situation as it comes with was the same:

Our "Live" interview was conducted in warheit 10 minutes before ausstralung recorded. This was related to the data via cell phone network to broadcast station and there are connection issues already existed.

In Frensehn would have probably given a little time to ask the people.
-------------

I am + / - 2 weeks Within its Soap ne fairly small supporting role playing. How did it NEN A4 sheets get on the stand, which I agree with the publication. In total, the Declaration of maybe 5 lines long. Signature trunter set and that's it.
Later we s.Bahnhof filmed, the movie will probably p.27 in Internet. (NEN werd poasten link)






Antwort von rush:

Hi,

So it suited me well, the people in front of the camera to ask ... speak in front of the camera to tell what it is about and what format / subject you want to make something of him and then with continuous name in camera to confirm ... so you later if someone complains to the whole tape ... so we handle the most ...
The material should then stop synonymous only to the connection using ...

Otherwise you can generally assume that (larger) cameras in public space of the synonymous people are perceived as such and that they know what is happening. in total is synonymous less tragic than if you close photographing individuals. It can not hurt synonymous times briefly ask whether it is okay,



Antwort von Pianist:

"rush" wrote: Otherwise you can generally assume that (larger) cameras in public space of the synonymous people are perceived as such and that they know what is happening. in total is synonymous less tragic than if you close photographing individuals. It can not hurt synonymous times briefly ask whether it is okay,
Exactly. The size of the camera as it plays a very important role, because people with a great camera must assume that because no one is filming for private purposes. With a little camera just looks very different. Even if the lawyers do not like to hear: There is so synonymous something like a "common sense", and if this applies, you are in practice synonymous graded according to the correct paths to no trouble to get.

Shots with a lot of people are not a problem, key words are "panorama freedom" and "accessory". Assuming tight s.einige ran a few people, it is not only a legal requirement, but synonymous courtesy of a bid, the people beforehand to ask. If I for example in an underground train wants to turn a wide shot, then I call synonymous times briefly in the train in, if someone on the other hand, in a film of the transport company to be seen to be. And if the (almost never) the case, who is just so that he can no longer be seen, or I go a few steps next.

And in surveys, it is always clear: Those who answered that the true synonymous implied a recovery. True and formal writing, I have never done, but I can imagine situations where you absolutely should do.

So, mind power and graded action.

Matthias



Antwort von PowerMac:

I do not know what you want. Who responds to a question, which is in agreement with the broadcast. Thus, it is common practice in Germany. You can believe what you want. But I work a few years already synonymous with the Ö.-R. synonymous and know their views. It should be every journalist saying, literature to journalism to ask a forum instead of asking. The rights situation is actually something of sauklar on the topic and the topic is part of every standard of journalism training. Whether volunteer or study. As for literature was asked:

"TV Journalism of Martin Ordolff"
"TV journalism. A manual for training and practice. Of Gerhard Schult"
"Telecommunications and Multimedia of law dtv"
"Basic Law"
"The TV report of Martin Ordloff"
and perhaps even "The Video Journalist of Dushan Wegner"



Antwort von transsib:

Hello!

Again many thanks for the tips, thank you very much synonymous for literature references, PowerMac.

I'll rather go to play it safe and the people in detail about it, for what I want to use the recordings and then synonymous me to do so. I would like times with 2 or 3 smaller features, which I publish on the Internet and a travelogue, I will offer to purchase, attempt.

Even if I manage to travel some of the DVDs for sale, the few Euros turnover in relation to any potential fines or compensation claims. Since then, I would prefer if one or the other interview is not obtained, I will afterwards but anger did not synonymous. Also my little HV10 is no professional camera and looks synonymous not so - because it certainly makes sense to the other party be informed that he might have to purchase a DVD or the Internet will take place again.

The references are also very helpful for me - if I now synonymous some movies have acting experience and the images usually look very neat, I have no experience with the preparation of reports - there would be something Aufschlauung perfectly justified. ;-)

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Trans" wrote: would like times with 2 or 3 smaller features, which I publish on the Internet and a travelogue, I will offer to purchase, attempt.
In this case, I can PowerMacs list of literature to recommend two other books included:

"Earning money with DV" of Andreas A. Reil, Mediabook Verlag

"Video like a pro" of Ulrich Vielmuth, Fachverlag Schiele & Schön

Gruß Bernd E.