Frage von charletto:
Hello first time the forum
I'm new here and hope that I'm equally good as in the Nikon forum, in which I was previously - as a hobby photographer.
Quite strange, I am not the shooting, did 2 years ago with its Canon XL! S filmed - concert recordings and marriages, but after I had too much drag me and the effort was too big, I changed into the other camp.
But the love for shooting and was left so I am now bought the FX1 and versuchs again.
J am 54 old and in North Rhine-Westphalia at home, born in Austria and worked in catering.
Can you give me any tips, with which PC I NEN reasonable cut processing can make?
And what are your experiences with the Cam?
For your answers, thanks jetztmal
love and greeting
Charly
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
So my experience with the FX1 in brief:
- I like the viewfinders are not so much because the camera position is uncomfortable for me is, furthermore, the picture in the display much clearer (still synonymous with full sunlight). That little bit more power interferes with the fat 970er Battery not really;
- In the wide-field lens slightly distorts the barrel (like most WW of course), which disturbs but only straight lines s.Bildrand and apart from that it has one of the shortest focal lengths WW-ever;
- With the thick Battery over 4 hours recording operation, which ensures equal synonymous for a better balance (with the standard part Overweight forward);
- Very nice s.Focusring processing and zoom lever (run "like cream");
- A little cumbersome for automatic shutdown of the exposure, it must Aperture, shutter and manual gain while running, otherwise, the Camera on the remaining automatics appropriate;
- Peak and Zebra do not go at the same time, you can turn used;
- Sound is in automatic mode according to my impression too quiet ausgepegelt. Manually you can because a lot more rausholen;
- Shot transition is extremely useful;
- Nice quiet autofocus while s.Motiv nothing changes;
- Very neutral color, which is on presets, but additionally can adapt;
- Proper weight;
- Optical stabilization is great.
So, for PC: HDV editing may not have enough power. Editing program: I have Pinnacle Studio 10th That is just so (stability problems).
BG
Andreas
Antwort von charletto:
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your feedback. Synonymous'm excited about the Cam, but now only come about them extensively times to test s.WE had to work and they've only s.Samstag get. Only a little sad or disappointed, I am concerned at the feedback here in the forum, there is what the photographer is different and I thought that this is synonymous here is the case ....
Well, the PC, I will make smart times, have previously Premiere Pro 2.0 to cut ... mal gucken
Lieben Gruß
+ Grateful yet.
Charly
Antwort von Jan:
Well that is synonymous not art for the photo forum, but for the most part, optics or cameras to the 1000 ¬ Class - often well below synonymous - Consumer Area halt - what to buy and the mass has daheim.
Really a lot of practical tips and expertise of a Canon 1 D Mark III (same price class FX 1) I find not synonymous with the big forums ala DSLR, very rarely did the user of the matters described therein, the camera really at home and not the data of other Forums & magazines depreciated or invented something, or again just a rough makes nonsense - eg litter bug Lens proves the (unfortunately very often comes in the well-known forums before) and without the other users in advance to say a cheap UV filter glass window in front of the optics to screw - the reason for the high dispersion was responsible.
There is unfortunately synonymous there s.Anfängern a large number - were in the forum as a professional issue.
FX 1 ist halt ne prosumer, but very rare for a client as a normal camera is used, often connected with money. A number of the true professionals to write in the rarest cases in the forums, at least I could know that it is often filmmakers and Consumer
Apprentice film and video s.den universities interested. There are rarely user ala Wolfgang, Markus and Matthias while (which I forgot - do not be malicious)
Well I did with the FX 1 very briefly a few months ago filmed, so I've not expressed an opinion, keep FX 7 and PD 170 filmmakers.
The well-known programs for HDV are repeatedly mentioned, including of course APP 2 & 3, Final Cut Pro and Vegas 7, at the Consumer zb Magix Deluxe 2007 / 2008, Pinnacle Studio 11 Pro, Ulead Video Studio 11 Pros.
A couple of FX 1 film here so I think yet, but they are really in the minority and non-synonymous all day online.
VG
Jan
Antwort von PowerMac:
That's right now so not quite. Some people here who I know personally, do a lot with the Z1. My experience I have often mentioned: moderate Lens coupled with no manual zoom, the flaccid Fokusrad, but sometimes synonymous meaningful Schärfeverlagerunsfunktion quite ordinary and the processing and useless Viewfinder (good: display) make the camera from. The Battery holds long synonymous, the Picture rauscht very little and the look is quite clear. The HD is sooo not sharp, but a good basis for Downconverts to SD. Fummel can I find the keys and that the various sections (gain, aperture, shutter) disqualify itself against when they are partly to Auto. Oh yes: the automatic Tonaussteuerung is great. Has ever a lot saved. Better than I could s.Mischer ...
All in all EB-stuff for almost a better choice than a grand.
Antwort von Jan:
Sorry - Powermac ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von charletto:
Hi Jan,
stand fully and completely behind your statements on the various photo forums, meets 100%. I had ne D200 with the top of Nikon lenses and have enough fun so synonymous, but then ultimately thousands of images s.PC or on DVD's and for what exactly? Therefore, the change back to the movie because I or others NEN film look much more often than pictures, divesersen apart of the family reunion, where you can then just photos to ASbwinken looking ....
Nunu, I'm not a professional, although I sometimes synonymous with and for ARD, ZDF, WDR & turned, I'm very enthusiastic amateur filmmakers and previously had with the Canon XL 1s various events, weddings, etc. Working as a contract made.
Ultimately EDR effort but was in no more relation to price and therefore the stock photo ... Now, make ichs just for me and since I very demanding in terms body image, I apologize for the FX1 and decided not think that this was a mistake. I do not need broadcast Hihh End Camera, but a hobby for the pure use - because it does cream of image quality.
PC moderately I'm still at the consultation, because HD material creates my calculator is not likely to ... synonymous and therefore the question in the forum ....
LG
Charly
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) But then ultimately thousands of images s.PC or on DVD's and for what exactly? (...) Lies mal Lucia Santaella and Barthes on this topic;)
Antwort von charletto:
Do you have a specific link to the article ..
Antwort von PowerMac:
Santaella, Lucia. "Photography between death and eternity." P. 33-37. Barthes, Roland. "Camera Lucida". P. 88-99. In: Schöttke, Detlef (Hrsg.): From the voice on the Internet. Articles from the history of media analysis. Göttingen. 1999.
Antwort von charletto:
Oh, sorry, not now thought s.Buchlektüre or NEN Fachbericht it .... but no preference, I am truly delighted and decided to forward to my new free time ...
LG
Charly
Antwort von r.p. television:
Hello Charlie.
I have the FX1 times just for a private holiday in Paris, and loaned it to this moment, the first HD material was that I had rotated, I was very satisfied and pleased.
Specific camera I noticed a problem that unfortunately some of my recordings has muffs.
Because of the camera weight is light at high focal lengths of the Image Stabilization is a good thing. Since I turned free hand, I have him always on.
Often, I have as a church cross, etc. fully angezoomt during the recording and I'm back in the WW gone. Did it advance angezoomte motif a la golden cut in an outer picture by third placed gently swing. This maneuver over the software and the Image Stabilization and the total recording provides the first from behind, as if in a frame replacement recording has been omitted. So like a time jump.
In fact, "calling" but the Image Stabilization.
If you then take into account in your recordings and it depending on the movie way off.
LG Mike
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
(...) This maneuver over the software and the Image Stabilization total (...) In fact, "calling" but the Image Stabilization.
If you then take into account in your recordings and it depending on the way film .(...) disable ... It is for this camera to an
optical Image Stabilization, since no software can be overwhelmed. For the apparently "relaxed" frame so something else must be responsible ...
BG
Andreas
Antwort von r.p. television:
I said no software synonymous in the classical sense, but to control the optical stabilizer.
There is nothing more responsible. Just testing. Something ranzoomen and then relatively quickly in the Wide Angle Switch, while a little swirl, or rotate the camera axis.
The stabilizer caused a "plucking", ie he remembers he gets behind and jumps regelrecht after. I thought synonymous until they are dropouts on the tape, but the look different.
Antwort von avinth:
Hi Charly,
for PC and MAC as Premiere Pro is super!
Many greetings,
avinth
