Frage von BjörnS:
Hi folks,
I ask you to purchase advice:
Schwanke when I purchase the Panasonic NV-GS 27EG and the JVC GR-D360, ie in the price range around 250 - 300 euros.
Both are of the similarly equipped (of the remote control of the GR-D360 apart). I have both been synonymous in the hand held. The JVC I find better and easier to handle than the Panasonic.
Only one point s.der JVC bother me ... they probably do not like the Image Stabilization Panasonic (SIS) ... in any case, I have no data to read (or has the JVC for another title?). How important is a complete Image Stabilization?
Is it your view else features / benefits for the purchase of one of the two models to speak?
Thanks in advance!
Gruss
Antwort von dj-senol:
How important is a complete Image Stabilization? On an Image Stabilization is especially important that it is switched off and that it never turns possible. Such digital image stabilizers are (due to its effect) the worst Bildverunstalter what both the Picture impression as synonymous technical Resolutionangeht, because on the one hand the number of usable pixels and reduce the other does not distinguish between desirable and undesirable movement of the camera may vary. Habit you prefer, the camera in a quiet position. For example, by covering s.einem railings, reliance s.einem lamppost and then next. I want so Hobbyfilmern of times not to carry one call stands.
As a short form: Forget the Image Stabilization.
Matthias
Antwort von MrMuppet:
So, optical image stabilizers are usually pretty good! Because they do not stop reducing the picture quality, you mjuß just a little s.das "After Shake" acclimatise. In most cases where people without a tripod filming is very good to gebraucehn, and in the few other cases, the stabilizer can be so off! Unfortunately, there are various price category warscheilich only digital stabilizers, and they are now, because I agree with Mattias, really unusable!
Greeting
Vasco
Antwort von dj-senol:
Forget the Image Stabilization. and is not my opinion. A quiet room is a work in any case to be recommended - but not always succeed in sufficient measure. A stabilizer can significantly reduce the bad effect - in situations where no perceptible difference between electronic and mechanical / optical P. likely to be noticeable (to me at any rate in the comparison between SonyTRV20 (electrical) and TRV 900 (optical) is not noticed).
Since the electron. Procedure a part of the chip surface with additional pixels for the stabilization is used, however this could be a slightly reduced light sensitivity lead.
Gruss
ph
Antwort von Jan:
On a tripod, the stability is almost always off, no preference of what "nature" he is. If you can well watch the Picture Stabilizer with "walk" to see more electricity so you need to be synonymous.
VG
Jan
