Frage von clubno1:
Good evening everybody,
times I had a little question;)
and although the following: I want to make a series of video recordings of a known professionally further leave would like to predict but sometimes a rough cut selection.
of the functions enough for me since the windows movie maker vista of this completely and is simply synonymous very comfortable, at first glance seems to me that the quality loss of the edited file synonymous very low, and that is what is important to me. in the issue, I always "best quality" and dv-avi (pal) a.
how experts see it as that? do you think the already fit, ie the qualitative is not great suffering, or because I can with other programs but decisively better results (less quality loss) achieved?
Many thanks for your effort!
SORRY TO POST THE COURSE IN THE AREA post;)
Antwort von PowerMac:
If someone should continue to work professionally, let all his preparatory work. And you have to do it, then work with professional software. Movie Maker is scheisse.
Antwort von clubno1:
ever grateful for the response! therefore a pre, I must make in any case, I will not do it, by 40 hours of material to forest.
the handling of her komm ich halt with movie maker super clear, it goes so fast, the only question is whether the stop loss of quality first, maybe bigger than I am with the naked eye and on the PC monitor can detect and secondly because if I was with another program like Premiere better results ..
the final quality raumschiffmäßigen values must not have my original files have 13gb per hour. I want to cut crude processing and to pass on ..
Antwort von PowerMac:
Then dear premiere and give your cutter the Project File.
Antwort von JMS Productions:
the handling of her komm ich halt with movie maker super clear Take Movie Maker
the only question is whether the stop loss of quality first, maybe bigger than I am with the naked eye and on the PC monitor can detect and secondly because if I was with another program like Premiere better results ... Why should the MovieMaker worse results? Because he is free and is in Windows? As long as you are keen to export your settings to your needs further editing, because nowhere is something worse. If you export settings as a DV-AVI choose, then since no other DV-AVI with out, as if you do with a 1,000,000 ¬ expensive XYZ Pro Deluxe Premium-star program exportierst.
Of course, there is a difference between Premiere and Movie Maker that otherwise would not premiere almost 2000 and cost ¬ Moviemaker nothing. This difference is much more s.zusätzlichen Features. The Movie Maker easy enough for you, hard cuts, flashes a few titles and a few crossfades, but if it s.Color correction, keyframes, keying, etc goes, you will be with the old Movie Maker.
Long story short: The way I interpret your projects, ranging thee from the Movie Maker. Forget not the right export settings to choose, so that no loss of quality (of DV AVI to DV-AVI) is ...
Antwort von TheBubble:
One thing you should perhaps consider: I do prefer films from individual clips (scenes) together as one long movie file, which many clips in a row contains nachzubearbeiten.
Perhaps your friend would be happier if you get him just the clips (possibly numbered) give, instead of your choice into a single long clip and assemble into a single file to export.
Antwort von Wiro:
Perhaps your friend would be happier if you get him just the clips (possibly numbered) give ... Au weia.
Here is the speech of 40 (!) Std material. This would provide thousands of individual clips. Even if it is the material to a few hours herunterkürzt still remain a few thousand clips. I would not accept as a cutter ;-)
Related Links: Movie Maker if you really just shortening used is in fact no objection. It has to be strictly and consistently s.die hold DV standard.
Greeting Wiro
Antwort von TheBubble:
Even if it is the material to a few hours herunterkürzt still remain a few thousand clips. I would not accept as a cutter ;-)
You would find a single file, with possibly a few hours raw, really pleasant, than to recordings (scenes) separate individual files, synonymous when it admitted many would be? I would find the many clips pleasant, if they are of course a certain order (eg chronological order) have left me happy but synonymous of arguments for a different approach to convince.
Antwort von Wiro:
Hello,
because it is the DV material wahrschl we speak. of 40 bands a 1 hour, I would tape each capturn in Movie Maker and the Insignificant weglöschen, what then is left as zus'hängende Avi file export. So remaining 40 files, although unterschiedl. but many are fairly straightforward.
The final cutting and assembly is so in my experience faster. Unless we talk of a storyboard in which each scene is set. That I think is not.
At best he speaks with the cutter, as it would like.
Moreover, it goes with the MM, but we are united.
Greeting Wiro
Antwort von TheBubble:
At best he speaks with the cutter, as it would like.
That will probably be the best :-)
Antwort von clubno1:
So I really thank you for your reply!
of course, is synonymous to me clear that premiere is better than movie maker;)
but I am going for the rough times now probably the movie maker for free (the raw files for safety's sake of course still retain times) because the quality is lossless if at very low appears to be.
I want the familiar, the further, do not much have to be cut apart, which should really only worry about it, the whole economy is still in 16:9, a menu to prepare and have a graphic frame around the current film (music-doku ) so that it may decrease the total synonymous still be small, especially in older recordings, which are not yet a good basic quali had a little better look aims.
really many thanks again for your tips!
