Frage von Nachtmensch:
Have today received the Cam and the same with great excitement unwrapped and tested. Since it is already late, I've only in the apartment under normal light bulb and pictures. The first glance at the display, which is synonymous only 300 'pixel has already let me guess what's coming ... So a new HDMI cable unwrapped and s.Toshiba 47Z3030 (Full HD LCD, with whom I am very satisfied) is connected. My subjective feeling first disappointment on the whole line! The picture very noisy and the colors are very pale play. The whole reminds me s.meine First cheap-camera many many years ago that I had immediately resold. And it was really scrap!
Cam I will again tomorrow during daylight hours to try. Sure, the shots better, but I mainly want to begin my little baby in the flat film. So I will probably send back the Cam. Unless you can possibly say what I did wrong or could have noted in the recording or playback s.LCD.
Since there is no test reports are my questions:
Does anyone here have experience with the SR10 can be done and maybe give me hints (eg, color, white balance)?
I expect perhaps too much at the keyword and full HD for 700 euros, or is this noise image with a cam of the normal price range?
If such light conditions synonymous with other Cams - I liebäugle with the Canon HF 100 - with such results to compute?
I would be failing synonymous to classical recording media such as mini-DV back - mainly the Full HD Picture is reasonable and my pain threshold, price now of 600 to 800 euro is not exceeded.
Antwort von chlorophyll:
Try it once with a head light wen your Cammera has an accessory shoe
Antwort von Markus:
... in an apartment under normal light bulb ... The picture very noisy and the colors are very pale play. In recent years, the image converter in camcorders ever smaller, to the detriment of the luminous work. At the same time, however, were more and more sensor points to the image converter packed, which is also detrimental to the luminous effect. The problem with dark images will finally meet with signal amplifiers, the noise is really standing out can be. The turn is with noise reduction tries to oppose the Picture then with artifacts pervade. All in all, therefore not favorable development in terms of image quality - always in favor of lower purchase prices, which most users require.
Just like with standard definition camcorders is synonymous with high-resolution models simple and better equipment. At a purchase price of less than ¬ 1000 I go to high-resolution camcorders from entry area. The middle class is, I think less and less present and then there is the luxury consumer à la FX7 or FX1. We should naturally expect more, but in low light (such as domestic lighting) does not provide the synonymous "richtig schönes Picture more. That is the price that one at "high" are still ultimately pay.
Antwort von baradaeus:
thank you for reply. that sounds both plausible. have - as announced - recordings made in daylight. they are really excellent become. a very clear picture, the 15x optical zoom is great and the synonymous stabilizer works well.
However, the photos that you can shoot, synonymous with daylight only moderate (on a 47-inch LCD). as a comparative photos I have a 4 year old canon ixus digifotocam with 3 million. pixel ... but that was almost clear to me that there are no reasonable combined product on the market, so do not bother me particularly. I will be inside me for a cheap video recording light (HVL-HL1) growth and hope, so fairly reasonable to make recordings.
Antwort von chlorophyll:
For short distances is certainly a good solution.
