Frage von almatic:
Hello,
Although I have already used the search but somehow it all helps me not next, so my problem is I have 25p material in the Calculator captured, it then burned a DVD. If I use the material on a TV do I need to reflect the material before burning deinterlace, because otherwise I comb filter and flicker from artificial lighting in the bright areas have.
Is this normal?
Thank you very much
Julio
Antwort von Markus:
[25p material] When I use the material to reflect a TV ... ... with a DVD player that can output progressive video? Over a wired connection, the progressive video such as forwards? At a (flat screen) television, the progressive image sequences can represent?
Otherwise, the image no fun. ;-)
Antwort von almatic:
Unfortunately not, the material was delivered, you can still save what?
Thank you very much
Julio
Antwort von Markus:
It tell me times that you have the end result will deliver again synonymous. Something is concerned yes videographers have thought (or would have liked to think), when he chose 25p.
What do you know how your customer will see the DVD? Maybe yes, he needs a purely progressive results without any deinterlacing lossy?
Antwort von Hogar:
Maybe because I misunderstood what but:
Why ask Vollbild deinterlace material again?
There's only quality is lost and nothing else changed.
The MPEG stream on the DVD should be seen as a progressive set, that's all.
Normal TV devices offer it anyway as half and as devices that are progressive scan, which then make it as progressive content.
Hogar
Antwort von Apache:
@ Markus:
yes this is the film dirty.
Is spent on TV and plasma.
@ Hogar: because you have not misunderstood, that is synonymous my knowledge, but the 25p material looks on a TV extremely bad, after the deinterlace with the usual but without the disadvantages Kammfilterartefakte. I just do not know why ....
Regards
Julio [/ list]
Antwort von Axel:
@ Hogar: because you have not misunderstood, that is synonymous my knowledge, but the 25p material looks on a TV extremely bad, after the deinterlace with the usual but without the disadvantages Kammfilterartefakte. I just do not know why .... 25P material can be a maximum of Interlace, or if it is from the original material comes interlace, which was deinterlaced, reinterlacen. Frames - when what they really are - in addition to the ominous "bucking" phenomena do not produce, you could describe as artifacts. A
comb The causes of noise around the issue of i / p, exhaust themselves in a logically incorrect treatment, that
is interpretation. The deinterlacing is bad. Maybe it's 24 fps, but interlaced. In 25 fps horizontal distortions would then be expected, as if with a rake runs through a pudding. Perhaps when some process (eg the import of the original P-material into a interlace Project) a row dominance is assumed. For real interlacing of frames must first be active from a Picture two scheduled consecutive interpolated fields, not just purely with the Ps in the I-timeline! The latter probably happens quite often, which would be the frequent complaints about bucking explain.
