Frage von orbi:
Moin,
actually come from the direction of photography, I will now but a EOS 5D Mk II growth. Did I ever some HD video camera runtergeladen (original footage), Premiere Pro CS4 installed test version - and it does nothing. Meaning: Even a simple clip preview without any effects or cross fades with jerky seconds per picture (and not frames per second) to go out.
Before I now buy all the stuff and then not use it efficiently: Are there any workarounds to cutting unnecessary way?
I was floating in the direction, initially with low-dummy clips to work and then all the auto settings on the HD material to be transferred - it's a function in Premiere?
Or do I have the material completely convert first (of what was "recoding" read)? Here I have to lose quality?
Thank you!
orbi
PS
I use NEN Macbook Pro Dual Core 2.6 Ghz (1.5 years old, not the current model), 7200Umin hard drive, 4 GB of RAM.
The footage comes in Quicktime 1080p H.264; 38.6 Mbits / sec, therefore.
Antwort von Supaeasy:
HD movies on a laptop to cut is such a thing .... I would not recommend it to you. There are, however, called mojo. These are devices that can connect via USB to the laptop and the computational load decrease. One of our editors used Avid for s.einem MacBook Pro - whether that is compatible with Premiere, I do not know.
When recoding of course you lose quality. However, it is synonymous depending on where you want to see your movie. If you do not have HD television, then a normal PAL format (720 × 576 pixels), what you already had some s.Dateigröße and save computation time should be.
In addition, the preview / editing quality / duration of a question of GPU, RAM and hard disk speed. The CPU in turn you need to render / Coding. Just so you know what you are on a watch for any new purchase. Slightly cheaper are you but in any case with this mojo away. I think that would be somewhere around the 700 ¬ if you know someone who in the industry makes an education, there are allegedly training with discount already s.200 ¬.
Antwort von orbi:
Hi, thank you in advance. Son Mojo, I have until now only found for Avid, but I look again next.
Generally, to be initially (high quality) web videos of it are. So probably 720p (on Vimeo). However, some of whom have subsequently synonymous again be rendered in 1080p.
Antwort von Axel:
With Final Cut Pro would be previously converted into ProRes. Mini display, external monitor, therefore, advisable.
Antwort von rainermann:
Hi
is less s.MacBook Pro, but possibly more s.Programm or settings. I cut Full HD (1920 * 1080) and easily s.MacBook smooth (no pro!) With 2.0 GHZ and 2GB / purchased in early 2007. Program editing is Final Cut Studio. For larger effects I scolded the preview quality down, then the synonymous quite well. The MacBook I tend to take on the spot when things directly cut and must be imported. The tip is synonymous with ProRes is very good. Top quality at a small memory footprint and runs very fluently synonymous with FCut.
PS Yes, just see that my predecessor already had the same answer. I can only stress :-)
Antwort von orbi:
@ rainer mann: You use ProRes be synonymous? Hopefully it is really only s.dem H.264 stuff.
Otherwise I would have to find out why my Mac is so lame: (So far, he just ran - I have no clue as to where you really Optimization. Has anyone NEN Tip?
Antwort von PowerMac:
The footage of the MKII, you can not directly intersect with Premiere.
You need to recode it in advance. Via MPEG Streamclip or with the Render Manager of Final Cut Pro. I would recommend Final Cut Pro before the premiere.
Antwort von rainermann:
yes, I take ProRes or synonymous directly without converting the files in the XDCAM EX PMW-EX1. If yes both of Final Cut Pro directly supported. And incidentally, should be synonymous with Quicktime Final Cut absolutely no problem - FC and Quicktime are indeed less "together". Mac s.Deinem So it is not 100% because've ne top machine!
Antwort von rainermann:
The footage of the MKII, you can not directly intersect with Premiere.
You need to recode it in advance. Via MPEG Streamclip or with the Render Manager of Final Cut Pro. I would recommend Final Cut Pro before the premiere. That means it must be synonymous with Final Cut Pro before encoding? Or. as usual on the timeline and render to draw?
Antwort von WideScreen:
....
The footage comes in Quicktime 1080p H.264; 38.6 Mbits / sec, therefore. Sagt mal ..... 38.6 Mbits? H264? So could be the AVCHD? Could it be that the calculator on each Jerkiness would? I think this is not a GOP AVCIntra but compressed.
I felt as if people are already nörgelten because their 8Mbit Stream to accomplish was ....
Know me with the AVCHD on average does not look like it, but 40 Mbits is already a word. Or am I mistaken? Only times as an indication.
Antwort von pailes:
No AVCHD is not. It is in H.264. Mov container. I have not even 5D Mark II, but I think the data should be about right. With AVCHD, such data rates IMO not allowed, there should be the upper limit at 24mbit / s..
Antwort von WideScreen:
The fact is that the AVCHD is based on the H264. So that's virtually nothing else.
Hardly believe that it is intra-frame recording, but an Inter frame coding.
When I read the contributions so yes some of the coding in order to ProRes or talk of "no problems at 1920x1080. But ProRes is not a 40Mibt H264 and no problems at 1920x1080 reveals nothing about the codec.
Antwort von orbi:
hm, the ProRes conversion seems indeed viable way to be (except that I have huge hard disks and the lug must encode ne lasts forever).
When I saw it correctly, you can use different qualities for ProRes setting. Must I always take the höchste/10-Bit or makes no sense for the MKII material?
Antwort von Axel:
hm, the ProRes conversion seems indeed viable way to be (except that I have huge hard disks and the lug must encode ne lasts forever). You need to encode only what you really want to use s.Clips. An alternative possibility Preview hast thou so sure. With small files and without the need for conversion is certainly the most relaxing workflow, the entire first to Plömpe editing program to load and
then to sift and sort. In this case the classical method would be useful but not import what you do not use.
When I saw it correctly, you can use different qualities for ProRes setting. Must I always take the höchste/10-Bit or makes no sense for the MKII material? Thus I was not involved. If somewhere a choice between
good and
better made, knee-jerk, I chose the latter. I guess it is related to the extent to which color do you still want. It may be synonymous not hurt if your Quicktime updates, whether it is what
good, if you know any better than I do after
this
