Frage von zueriman:
Pretty bad that Canon 2 years after the release of visas is still no updated Vista-Console software offers. For a semi-Camera entirely bad, since virtually all new computers with Vista only ausgliefert. For me, this is the main reason that I still have no Canon XH A1 bought. It does seem as if Canon will soon a successor model of the XH A1 and therefore launched the development for the old product in question.
Or is the console software is unnecessary, if you have Adobe Premiere CS3?
Antwort von r.p.television:
The only Windows Vista is unnecessary. Sad but true.
I suffer synonymous with a Vista laptop which can not run under XP brings. This is thus a pure puppets toys because although somewhat Adobe CS3 runs on it but my plug-in library can not and should not work. One is through the stupid Vista forced to either completely new licenses or really expensive and unnecessary upgrades to buy. And few software vendors in the professional video field to create upgrades for Vista, simply because it is shit and nothing decent to run. Alone s.Arbeitsspeicher disqualified the need for many applications.
Lieber a used laptop with XP, buy, or a calculator on the XP can still run or can.
Effects of Adobe OnLocation unfortunately not yet able to test. Anyway, you can not in the custom presets intervene as Console.
Antwort von kosmonaut:
The question is indeed synonymous, for which you want to use console. When the camera remotely or you will be directly on the hard drive would start, certainly makes sense. Also to the Camera Settings s.den is to work Console toll. However, the settings can be synonymous in all camera menu or with the XH-Tuner ", which is here at Slashcam there, edit. Console it's also expensive - about ¬ 600 in addition to the price of the XH-A1. An Otherwise, the XH-A1 a good Camera (hab synonymous one) if you want to work in HDV, this option or at least wants to keep open.
Gruß, cosmonaut
Antwort von Ficeduld:
Console is as unnecessary as Vista.
The former because of the price-performance ratio, the latter because of the pros s.Komplikationen in the area of video / PC.
The XH-A1, however, is for me still unbeaten for their price. Even if a successor should come, it will retain its value. My 2c.
Antwort von zueriman:
Thanks for the expert responses, which I am a bit closer s.die bring XH A1 ;-). So you think I should be compared with the Canon Sony Model prefer? For me they are important: Uncompromising image resolution, very good quality Lowlight (with a minimum s.Bildrauschen) and unproblematic transfer the recordings to the laptop. So as I of my good old legendary Canon SD Camera XM-1 am accustomed.
For Vista: Fact is - new computer, only shipped with Vista, for example, contain about 3000 euros expensive Vaio notebook. Even if I would install XP on it, then I am missing the important Vaio plugins.
PS Did not the Console software will cost something. Thought that you could download and use for free.
Antwort von Ficeduld:
Lowlight and Resolutionsiehe the comparative database on Slashcam ....
Capturing from tape with me absolutely no problem.
Must stop you can assemble a PC, for example in bridge, then you have the free choice of operating system. For notebooks ichs knows, however, not exactly .....
