Frage von Oko:
Will I end of the year to buy a camcorder.
My choice is definitely a type of HDD with like, the negative points compared to IR are known to me.
Now I have a friend of a test for about 2 years old JVC GZ-MG30 here.
And the image quality disappointed me, but unfortunately very! Is very Artfakten with and disorder through. It looks really awful, or at least on a 106er TV. I do not think it is broken, did the tests in various synonymous read.
Has since become what is happening in the technology do? Currently tend to actually SonyDCR-SR32 or Panasonic SDR-H20, both of which are currently under 400, -. But the quality should be better than the JVC!
Can someone subjective judgments about competence. Have enough to read test reports, which were both mostly positive. However, if the quality is still as bad as 2 years prior to the JVC, then I think on the whole purchase again, because that's enough for me then but not enough.
Thanks in advance
Gruß,
Oko
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
the SonySR 32 is in so few video magazines rather durchgeschlittert.
Videoaktiv.de, the current JVC MG 130 before the SR 32 - if you only judged the Picture - Pana H 20 is a different class. JVC is in contrast to Sonysynonymous a Hybridcam so synonymous movies on SD card.
As for the old Sony HDD cameras had not been able to cut into the camera, do the models of 2007 but now, fortunately.
I would consider whether the right Sonydie is synonymous if for Pana in the camera can not cut - it is much better for me, especially when the supplied Charger, the optical stabilizer, the manual exposure option, the external battery pack good choice (not the a Sony external battery at Ebay where you will no longer display) sets.
VG
Jan
