Infoseite // JVC brings 46 inch Full HD 3-D polarization Television



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


JVC brings 46 inch Full HD 3-D polarization Television of thomas - 11 Aug 2009 14:09:00
JVC has introduced with the JVC GD-463D10 a 3.9 inch flat and 46 inches (; 120cm screen size) big television, which is capable of 3-D for passive (or, so battery and light) represent polarized glasses. Particularly is that the two differently polarized stereoscopic images will be simultaneously broadcast and the picture is then filtered out of each of the glasses for an eye. The procedures in RealD 3-D cinema also works with polarized glasses, but when you turn the differently polarized images broadcast. One advantage of the JVC (used XPol procedure, the use of micro-polarizers work) compared with the usual 3-D TV and RealD shutter method: There is no dark phases in which the picture will disappear for an eye, that is not synonymous subjective brightness of waste or other optical irritations - the picture is stable. The resolution is 1920x1080, the native contrast of 2000:1 and 10,000:1 dynamic. Inputs to the DG-463D10 three HDMI connections with over the next 3-D video synonymous as standard HD 1080/24p may 50p, 60p, 50i and 60i are shown - 3-D video can bring in line with the line-by -line "or" Sidy be delivered-by-side "method and is then prepared for the internal XPol procedures. Two pairs of polarized glasses are in the packet there.

Again, this device is similar to the auto-stereoscopic 3-D displays, initially confined to a narrow circle of users - it is planned only 2,000 units per year to produce. The hefty price in Japan is around $ 7000, in England, £ 8,000, but the Home 3-D wave starts so synonymous to gradually ...

This is an auto-generated entry


This is news to report with pictures and link to the pages slashCAM Magazine


Space


Antwort von Valentino:

Can we watch with such a device then a normal 2D program without the glasses that you need?

Space


Antwort von tom:

"Valentino" wrote: Can we watch with such a device then a normal 2D program without the glasses that you need?


Yes, 2D can be synonymous watch it - without glasses
http://pro.jvc.com/pro/attributes/MONITOR/brochure/gd463d10.pdf

Thomas

Space


Antwort von strike300xxx:

3D is so old hat every few decades will be pulled out new spending to encourage the public to Money.

I have seen Ice Age in 3D movies.
My Conclusion:
The technology has not sufficiently improved despite major announcement.
It's still very hard so watch a feature film. The spectacle begins after half an hour see at painful.

3D is rather understood as a fairground attraction, and is probably about the bad stories that viewers will be offered today, away to deceive.

Space


Antwort von beiti:

"strike300xxx" wrote: The technology has not sufficiently improved despite major announcement.
It's still very hard so watch a feature film. The spectacle begins after half an hour see at painful.
I have to focus even at 20-minute 3-D shooting problems, my eyes still correct. Focus on the entire process in which one believes to see objects close s.Auge, but in reality "to infinity" must be, is simply unnatural. Obviously there are viewers who have so few problems, but synonymous, such as me - so I do not think that 3D will prevail in this form as a standard. Also, the glasses, whether or Pol-shutter glasses, no preference whether easy or difficult, complicate matters and organizational practice.

Space


Antwort von WoWu:

... and 63% of all Germans are wearing glasses ... what is with them? Are there "piecer"?

Space


Antwort von beiti:

"WoWu" wrote: . Are there "piecer"? The 3D glasses are usually so large that they fit over normal glasses.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash