Frage von Clemensch:
Love Slashcam community
We have a little problem with our internet videos and look for the cause. I hope to see you once again for help.
When you look at the videos on the homepage jerky the video again and again.
We have in the company several Calculator, with the same Internet connection.
On some computers, the videos run smoothly, and many do not. Unfortunately, by bucking the rest of the pictures lost.
I use for my internet videos. F4V Files (; synonymous with flv we have already tested).
In addition, we are still using the Wowza streaming server and put the videos with different bitrates available.
The videos are embedded on FLASH (; FLVPlayback component) in the homepage. We have already tested it in 2 different sizes, even with 650x365 and 950x533 with once!
Hatt, perhaps someone any idea what might that be? Or what we could still try so we get a grip on the stuttering.
Here is another Example finding: www.naturgastgeber.de / video-test.html 650x365
and
www.naturgastgeber.de 950x533
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Could s.den aka Save Temp Files of various Calculator are here jerky nothing.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von RickyMartini:
By bucking I'll fight now synonymous rum!
A high CPU load can cause the jerking example, in the full screen display. One possibility would be a problem synonymous with caching of the clips on the host, or a problem of the browser.
Currently I test on "youtube" and "Vimeo" with a 720p clip in the containers WMV, MP4 and F4V.
Antwort von MK:
Wow, check out the aspect ratio of at least divisible by an even number, 2 or 8
Antwort von Clemensch:
Hello thank you for your responses.
@ MK thanks for the tip, but unfortunately nothing will change! :-(;
We have all new PC and MC's here, so s.der CPU utilization, it can not lie.
For more tips, or synonymous Vorlschläge guess I would be very grateful.
Greetings
Clemens
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Distributed virtual memory to work with multiple partitions would be perhaps a Mäglichkeit.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von pilskopf:
At all times to control the memory, whether in the comps where the videos run smoothly, are not more in it than the others.
Antwort von Clemensch:
We really want the videos on as many computers running smoothly, the issue is not that the PC is bucking a par with us. We are concerned about the longer it takes place at the largest possible number s.Leuten Ruckelfrei! When we watch videos on other HP is choppy with not so broad as to our, or not at all (; zb. Newzealand.com).
Do you have experience with streaming server, or perhaps in general with embedded flash videos? What you used for recruitment to the videos? I post you my views:
. F4V / H.264
bitrate: 500kb - 1000kB
25fps
Progressive
Profile: Main
Level: 3.0
CBR
Keyframeabstand: 1 (; with 25 synonymous already tried)
The video settings that would actually fit!
Hatt, perhaps someone experience synonymous with the Wowza streaming server?
Bucking the 2 videos synonymous with you?
Thank you and best regards
Clemens
Antwort von Clemensch:
even here it runs Ruckelfrei! -> http://www.muchasmaracas.de I think so, and this is almost the maximum for the Internet.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
...... We are concerned about the longer it takes place at the largest possible number s.Leuten Ruckelfrei! .... Do not top a poll to me in 1000 with ner line without jerking run.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von tommyb:
Used as a random h264 codec?
Please post a sample file views (; link to F4V synonymous or what ever it is).
Antwort von Clemensch:
Hello TommyB,
Yes h264 is used, a bit above, you'll find the link next to the 2 videos, both encoded in h.264. more accurate setting, I'm a little bit above synonymous posted next!
If you like to make synonymous the original file available, but not until tomorrow morning because I am no longer in the organization
thank you very much
Antwort von tommyb:
As I said, specifically, a link to the file, not the embedded version in the player.
For h264 I have personally had the experience that the hardware is much difference whether or not jerky. On an AMD 4800 + X2 running the videos, but to stand in between. On an Intel 9300 (; quad), there will also be s.and jerks too, but not so strong.
Either the fault (in the video, missing frames by interlacing, etc.) or s.der technology. Especially the crooked resolutions that could be used be the reason.
Use for more videos sizes that are divisible by 16 - allerschlimmstenfalls druch 8th Odd numbers are even worse. For the present video rather then 640x360 or 640x352 (; MOD16) can support. For the second video 960x540 or 960x544 (; MOD16).
Antwort von MK:
Jerky here in the Internet Explorer 7 and running smoothly in Firefox ...
Antwort von bjelgorod:
Perhaps this is indeed synonymous s.den jerky pans and many rides. I've had the experience that it often comes to jerks and one for the Internet so little "sedentary" must rotate.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
.... And one for the Internet so little "sedentary" must rotate. That's times a tip!
From now on no Skate and Bike Videos and more on se x videos gibts now synonymous only cuddling, for listening - I've got in there Slashcam reads the jerk when moving objects or camera, the videos in the INet.
Synonymous but has an advantage this knowledge will s.sofort be no pirated copies of Action Shooting, as you will jerk in the INet.
............................
I've got a tip as synonymous ... should his hamster in the router turns his rounds every 3 weeks to give fresh water, he may, of course, only water from the LAN. If the hamster denoch times thirst then you can create a wireless cable between synonymous, then it works again synonymous with the videos.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von tommyb:
How long should it really be such a wireless cable? 've Heard that at 20 meters up, it is not so good with the throughput. Especially should it be synonymous not move around corners, because then the data s.der curve (at high speed; yes 54 Mbit fly) from the curve could ...
.... And one for the Internet so little "sedentary" must rotate. In this case, there really is much better methods, such as deinterlacing through the apertures of the various fields. Then jerky is not synonymous.
Antwort von Clemensch:
@ tommy b
Wow, the times I call a tip, which twisted resolutions are wircklich been the problem! :-) Can you please briefly explain why the resolution should be divisible by 16, so I understand the synonymous!?
Is it divisible by 16 resolutions, perhaps a table where all are listed, or should I expect from my own? :-)
From deinterlacing produces no error to be expected since the video along the entire workflow is and was always progressive.
@ b.dekid
synonymous thank you for your tip, the hamster is no cable in a hot tub! :-) Died, he was inundated data flow of a misguided! :-(;
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Poor hamster could not swim well ... Cable and Wireless can only be put in generous curves and does not get along well with Speedports, because then the data is flying fast out of the corner ;-)
Liquiditations from SUPER
See Photos
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von tommyb:
@ Clemensch
This was with the "nature" of the codecs do. The picture is split into the Compress-called macroblocks. Each block has a rule. a size of 16x16 pixels. Ie the picture a kind of checkerboard cut, each plot has a size of 16x16 pixels. For a picture with 720x576 pixels, you would have exactly 1620 units. These macroblocks are used for the calculation of changes of the image - is a complex issue to explain this.
The video codec can work in principle synonymous with odd numbers. Then the codec embedded 16x16 blocks are a sufficient and what is left (; for example, a 16x7 block) is complemented by a black surface, so that it is synonymous 16x16.
The problem is that the hard transition to black needs a little more bit rate than if a block image complete with information would be required. Furthermore, the player of the video going to ignore this "black value". This goes with the VLC or Media Player Classic very well - such as Flash Player, however, may encounter s.ihre limits - depends of the programming.
More on MOD16 get it here:
http://encodingwissen.de/spezial/mod-regeln.html
Antwort von MK:
The resolutions are crooked wircklich been the problem! Which is it? In post 5 You had already written that nothing has changed?
Antwort von bjelgorod:
@ B. DeKid
Hello Dekind B.
I have only communicated the experience, I've made. The jerk at Kamerabwegungen is due to the fact that a lot more picture information must be recalculated. The camera remains fixed and moving instead to film only the object of this effect occurs less. Whether you believe or not there should be synonymous movies without Kamer trips or wild zooms. Your polemic, I inevitably find something wrong and childish in s.Platz in a forum, where it actually should be about helping each other.
Antwort von Clemensch:
Which is it? In post 5 You had already written that nothing has changed? I had tried it since with a resolution which was divisible by 2, so I wircklich noticed no difference. With 8 I have not even tried it. synonymous not know that I had the 2 pixel resolution of a MOD16 to deduct / can. see Figure
Now, with a resolution that is divisible by 16, the stuttering is gone. :-)
You can take the difference today still look at the new videos are being embedded.
@ TommyB
Thank you!!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Bielgorod
Jo did not take offense, but that was just the best thing I einfiehl to your thesis.
Bzgl. Camera movement, childish, polemic, and other help, we could then deal with the next "Myths from the Dark Ages", ok?
Till then, have a nice one ;-) MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Clemensch:
The smooth version is now online! Wayne's interested -> www.naturgastgeber.de
best regards and thanks again
Clemens
