Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Just in time for IBC: Edius 5 is presented in brief of Thomas - 12 Sep 2008 12:28:00 An official press release is still pending, but, as Thomson / Grass Valley on its sides announced (and synonymous in our forum has been reported), will shortly appear Edius 5. A demo version is already available, a price has not been mentioned.
The new version is scheduled to complete the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Microsoft's Vista (runs under WinXP, however, synonymous). Furthermore, Edius Pro and Edius Broadcast now packages into a single merged version of the program. The following formats are now natively unerstützt in the areas of import, processing and export:
Thomson Grass Valley Infinity JPEG 2000
Panasonic DVC PRO 50 and DVC PRO HD, P2, Panasonic VariCam, AVC-Intra
SonyXDCAM and XDCAM HD (including 4:2:2 50Mbit), XDCAM EX
JVC ProHD
Ikegami GFCAM
AVCHD
HDV
Moreover, the processing is a Sanyo Xacti HD file format, the performance in the processing of native MPEG material has been improved (although with the Canopus HQ code still can work faster). Regarding the export, it was in this version of Procoder Express with a new export plug-in replaces that for faster and more flexible to ensure export. It provides "all possible options" regarding transcoding, scaling and adjusting the frame rates (for both Blu-Ray, DVD, mobile phone or YouTube). A generic MXF exporter adds additional professional output options, the MXF containers not only ensures the compatibility with the Thomson Grass Valley K2 Media servers, but synonymous to playout servers of third parties. It also offers an FTP Exporter MXF support and allows the use of Edius segment encoding and multi-threaded encoding technologies for MPEG-2 data.
The Xploder GPUfx effects have been replaced by a new collection of GPU-accelerated 2D and 3D transitions for SD and HD productions. With over 1000 different effect presets and hundreds of predefined settings GPUfx be easy to use and still full control over all effect parameters allow. It made all the calculations and the generation effect completely in YUV 4:2:2 color space, from memory to the CPU and GPU, and back again synonymous. However, it should be graphics card with an appropriate level of 3D processing (Pixel Shader Model 3.0 or higher) required. Unsupported graphics cards are not able to use GPUfx Effects in a Project view.
Other innovations include. An improved video designers with keyframe control, Clip Marker Support (use of P2 and XDCAM material are synonymous cameraman set of markers during shooting auto detected), Avid. ALE and Final Cut Pro. FCL Batch Capture support, simple insertion of " Freeze frames on the timeline, improvements in the Quick Title of Project Consolidation and undo / redo function. Also, the Suchfuntkionen have been revised. (For a complete list of all changes, see link below, so far only in English, or
here in our forum - Thank you for the side note)
The delivery of Edius 5 contain are
- ProDAD VitaScene (about 400 prefabricated video filters and transitions that of compatible graphics cards to accelerate)
- ProDAD Mercalli (for stabilization of shaky shots)
- NewBlueFX Motion Effects, Art Effects and Film Effects (additional 25 video filters for motion and color)
- IZotope VST audio plug-ins (consisting of 14 audio plug-ins for filtering and improving the tone)
- Corel DVD MovieFactory Pro (for creating and burning of DVD and Blu-ray titles)
In addition, new hardware solutions announced:
HD Storm / HD Storm Pros, HD Spark, HD Thunder, Firecoder Blu, Firecoder Intra -- mehr Info dazu in Kürze.
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von dvcut:
Good work, that could be my new favorite software.
Antwort von MK:
Good work, that could be my new favorite software.
Maybe in 1 year when the newly-built error correction are - or are not synonymous, so you know its Pappenheim, bugfixes come (maybe) in version 6;)
Antwort von camworks:
@ Slashcam:
an indirect reference wars not because I've added an email s.thomas (marfak) is written with the link to the postings in the forum said.
Antwort von blip:
an indirect reference wars not because I've added an email s.thomas (marfak) is written with the link to the postings in the forum said.
Then of course, synonymous thank you for direct advice!
(Thomas is now underway, the news I've made ..)
Regards, Heidi
Antwort von Jürgen F.:
Hello,
Good tip!
Werd I at IBC times in any case closer look.
Bin sowieso in search of the AVC-I Schnittprgramm.
Regards, Jürgen F.
Antwort von carstenb:
What is the advantage compared to AVID? Here, I am interested Comparison times, especially as the industry standard AVID is par excellence and sometime there any land if he remains professionally s.Ball. The price of AVID is synonymous no more argument, since it is cheap Edu versions. So, what is the advantage of a cutting system such as Edius?
Antwort von DV_Chris:
Edius stings with its speed, its real time capabilities and the possibility of an unbelievable number of codecs simultaneously on the TL to mix out. Moreover, the codec CanopusHQ of the picture quality loose with the best of the best match.
PS: with EDU versions, it is generally prohibited to produce commercially.
Antwort von camworks:
I was present at the IBC and hab mir Edius 5 Accuracy views. A few bugs are still there, from the 4.X being "saved", but overall a very cool update. For the raffle, incidentally, I have a full version of Edius 5 and was obtained as the first user in Germany, the program has officially, as it still is not to buy. 8-D
Then came yet Edius 4 other people under the packages.
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) As the industry standard AVID is par excellence and sometime there any land if he remains professionally s.Ball (...).
Quite rubbish. Avid constantly losing market share. Premiere, Final Cut Pro, Vegas and from Avid Edius solve. Final Cut Pro is also in many production companies more widespread. Even look at the cameraman compatriots? The Industry News, for example in Slashcam dvinfo or prosecuted? In the last five years, a few production companies attended? (Public broadcasting houses do not apply.)
Antwort von carstenb:
Quite rubbish. Avid constantly losing market share. Premiere, Final Cut Pro, Vegas and from Avid Edius solve. Final Cut Pro is also in many production companies more widespread. Even look at the cameraman compatriots? The Industry News, for example in Slashcam dvinfo or prosecuted? In the last five years, a few production companies attended? (Public broadcasting houses do not apply.)
With all due respect for your ambitions, but with "industry standard" I do not mean low-budget Wannabees in the field of image and wedding film and music video for the experiments Abiball ruin the market. My degree will I earn myself as editor and Assistant Editor for reputable companies and broadcasters, according to the fare paid and the wish to remain Avidcutter. What interests me is simply whether there Programs with a better codec, etc. are, so whether it quality arguments for other programs as the industry standard exists.
Antwort von camworks:
ahso. ;-) But then it would probably be better if you are of us "wannabees" not accept advice, but you remain in your "industry standard" environment.
how arrogant can you really be ... always amazing ...
Antwort von newsart:
It is precisely this "arrogance" and lack the sense of the rapidly changing market, I think Germany is currently in AVID powerful market price. And "industry standard" is synonymous probably not the right term.
What Avid cutter operators of other programs, in fact, have provided is the possibility of their know-how to certify it. Indeed, between Cutter and Cutter, there is in fact enormous differences. However, the certification so synonymous solely on the technical part and not on the creative performance.
Anyway, I would be if I trained as a cutter would be very careful with my chest stozer of "Wannabees" off. Malles see how long it classic cutter in Video / TV area still exists. There have been quite different professions in the media, technical developments and consequent structural verpennt while you are locking acquis entrenched behind formal requirements have ...
Carsten
Antwort von carstenb:
It is precisely this "arrogance" and lack the sense of the rapidly changing market, I think Germany is currently in AVID powerful market price. And "industry standard" is synonymous probably not the right term.
Au weia because I've probably hit a sore spot. To make it short times to make: The Avid editing EVERYONE can learn, there is nothing more elitist, like 10 years ago. And then you have just made an unpaid internship to AVID to learn and so could then earn really good money. The well-paid jobs for me so far have been exclusively AVID jobs. My experience: AVID = EARN MONEY. PREMIERE and Co: Präfilmhochschuljobs underpaid. Thus it was before, so it is today, welcome to the "real life"! I'm not arrogant, but simply had bitten back. To me a rascal to my innocuous question tell that I should look at production companies look to see what the situation is and I then click Page whose products with cheap effects in superior style hobby discover (there is not a matter which program the better effects , but whether this applies scrap ON MAIN), then I can a certain waspishness not resist ... :-)
What Avid cutter operators of other programs, in fact, have provided is the possibility of their know-how to certify it. Indeed, between Cutter and Cutter, there is in fact enormous differences. However, the certification so synonymous solely on the technical part and not on the creative performance.
I have no certification and know not synonymous with a kind of "testimony" would have. One learns when cutting, make a few assistants to the tricks of the professionals abzuschauen and "cut" so upwards. This trail is open to everyone (inveterate Premiere cutter than once ...).
Anyway, I would be if I trained as a cutter would be very careful with my chest stozer of "Wannabees" off. Malles see how long it classic cutter in Video / TV area still exists. There have been quite different professions in the media, technical developments and consequent structural verpennt while you are locking acquis entrenched behind formal requirements have ...
Why should I be careful? Overall, it is increasingly produced mainly in low-budget field. Na and if? My client has now 20 years ago with wedding and corporate videos really made much money. For image films were s.20000 mark in the first go. This market is completely weggebrochen because there are now just many pupils and students for nearly lau do this, the number of productions in this area with total safety verhundertfacht. People who were at that time, have also improved and now produce in a different league, or are away from windows. For "classic cutter" is the low-budget field nothing more, that's true. "Classic Cutter" just happy to earn well and stay with the other jobs. And there are - once you are in it - more jobs than we could cope. But unfortunately they are all on AVID. Sorry for s.die premiere fans ... :-)
Nevertheless, I am interested in simply whether there are features that Avid place in the shade. I do not stick s.Avid, but take it easy. If another program clearly points out correctly, will learn quite blithely. And referring to my initial question ...!
Antwort von camworks:
thou hast no sore point taken, but the right answer to your angeberisch acting legally get posting. so you must live.
did you continue with your postings just 3 people from the forum Slashcam negatively as "wannabees" title that you do not know and therefore synonymous not know what they can and for whom they work. so someone called foreninger troll.
for information for you: here cavort from absolute beginners up to grade all the absolute benefit of cameramen, editors and people of the synonymous video technology. some reported more often, some of less wordy too. a great error, therefore, is here someone hastily be underestimated (and thus raise themselves a la "I earn my degree as a cutter for serious customer, you do not").
to avid, premiere and consorts:
I am personally not a fan-premiere, but not absolutely synonymous avid-fan, but cut for years with Edius. nevertheless it must be said that the whole or premiere adobe video products of the present system are perfect. dream of all the other manufacturers cut program only avid synonymous. only comes with great, perhaps even painful appleanita turn, they try at least, a powerful suite on the footing.
if you really want to know how powerful a program or even an entire suite, then check it out. there of almost all programs s.markt trial in Edius has even run full 30 days. But be careful, all realtime, no rendering needed not synonymous for the output ... Edius is addictive, if the workflow has once intus.
Antwort von PowerMac:
At Carsten B: It widert me in if you are talking only with Avid could really work. Everything around with Final Cut Pro would be made, would be low-budget ... This is wrong and stupid. These shoes do you get no more from the foot down. With Final Cut films are cut, a lot of television and certainly a lot of TV stuff. Especially with RTL Vox and a very large number. Dear Carsten B: see you in the Forum of finalcutpro.de order. You encounter hundreds s.Profi-cutters with Final Cut Pro sowas arrogant front of the head. That is outrageous. Even your undertone against low-budget: You increase your budget and Normal and kick down. Low-and no-budget are wonderful things and have nothing to do with the choice of editing software.
Antwort von PowerMac:
With all due respect for your ambitions, but with "industry standard" I do not mean low-budget Wannabees in the field of image and wedding film and music video for the experiments Abiball ruin the market. (...)
Can you even more stereotypes and prejudices in a sentence to pack?
Antwort von camworks:
now reg but not on you ... :-) He do not know any better and foolish as well as he can.
Antwort von carstenb:
thou hast no sore point taken, but the right answer to your angeberisch acting legally get posting. so you must live.
So it was not meant at all. I simply wanted to ask why humans other than AVID Programs learns when he for a similar purchase price even after synonymous with cutting money can earn. Other thing, same effect: With my car driving license, I could later synonymous job as a driver, with my Mofaführerschein not. You have answered me and I assume that the above system and various other features for editing programs speak. But again: I'm going simply assume that the gate to the well-paid Schnittjob principle is open to anyone, if it is based on industry standards einlernt. So why not just cut in the program learn, which has a forward?
did you continue with your postings just 3 people from the forum Slashcam negatively as "wannabees" title that you do not know and therefore synonymous not know what they can and for whom they work. so someone called foreninger troll.
I have not offended, but their work evaluated ... as a return on their own arrogance. These are obviously not a "forum troll" ... But it's drum. Thanks in any case for your information.
@ PowerMac: Please Klär me to where I would have written, the man with everything Final Cut Pro makes low budget would be ... (I have next above the opposite, but here you have to really pay attention so that you do not Macjüngern and Avidhassern occurs on the feet ... uiuiui ...!!!)
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... My experience: AVID = EARN MONEY. PREMIERE and Co: Präfilmhochschuljobs underpaid. Thus it was before, so it is today, welcome to the "real life" ...
Avid itself would certainly be very happy if their experiences with your cover would ... But as everybody has his own "real life" that you not only as a benchmark for the rest of the world should be. Plus a personal counter-example: With TV, I have little to do (with only one, and is just of the Avid to Final Cut Pro in order), but in my immediate colleagues, the NLE distribution as follows:
7x Final Cut Pro
3x Avid (MC 1x, 2x Liquid)
2x Edius
2x Premiere
1x Vegas
We are talking here of production companies of different sizes with some international clients, not of students as "low-budget Wannabees". So much relating to "industry standard"! The industry has long been the wide-ranging as some seem to imagine. As seriously as you can argue that only with Avid can earn money and only this program forward, eludes my knowledge.
... To me a rascal ... tell ...
Such Abqualifizierung - even if you are among your colleagues for holding level - will help you little, the reputation of getting rid of arrogance.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von newsart:
Now I have still time to have your say, because the whole thread so a certain amount of humor does not:
Who - please - would be the idea, at the Book Fair a successful author to ask them, what with computer word processing program and what he's so nice, please circulation Bestsellers wrote?
SDAs I feel that so macher TV / video creatives a better software developer would be. How else can we explain that to 90 percent technical Grundsatzgebatten be, instead of content or structural concepts to be discussed.
Times I venture to assert that for the success as a TV documentary is totally insignificant, with the camera, the editing system, or what format (1080i or 720p or DigiBeta ...) the product was created.
So it is no coincidence that I can not tell, with what software I / as in my own production company, or cut with what we shoot cameras - it is absolutely irrelevant!
Collegial greetings, Carsten
Antwort von newsart:
oh incidentally "newsart" is NOT Carsten Carsten B.
Antwort von camworks:
How else can we explain that to 90 percent technical Grundsatzgebatten be, instead of content or structural concepts to be discussed.
presumably because the professionals are not in substance or in the conceptual maps can look like. ;-)
But in this specific thread is nunmal to Edius 5 and not about content or concepts. and then if someone with time for 2 postings come and specifies how a sack flöhe, then there are also against wind.
Antwort von jazzy_d:
"I dare look at the assertion that for the success as a TV documentary is totally insignificant, with the camera, the editing system, or what format (1080i or 720p or DigiBeta ...) the product was created."
Marco Tempest's "magic tricks" in NY filmed with a mobile phone and they were absolutely the hit.
