Frage von André Rusigy:
Hello Forum,
I would very much like something in this super-wide-and-flat format and am not quite out. It is sufficient if we are filming in mind that the top and bottom of the picture is slightly cut off? Is there somewhere a tutorial or advice on this format? Würde mich sehr freuen.
Thank you
André
Antwort von alibaba:
Put the film just five weeks in the middle of a thick book. It is then entirely of flat and wide.
Or you take in at 16:9.
How? No clue what it is and how it works?
Tip: right top is a search function. Is ne klasse invention!
Antwort von Axel:
On the diagram, the
Robinson family will soon publish in 3D, is being feverishly worked. The procedure used is a kind of half-technique and a non-pole or Farbbrille work, but only from a vertical viewing angle, so the side seats in the movies should not be sold. George Lucas is the revival of his old ham announced, and James Cameron is planning a kind of
Abyss-infusion. Wait.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Abyss came Saturday evening.
Antwort von André Rusigy:
Previously, I was able to answer, unfortunately None really something to offer. Schade. Document times after a competent forum search;)
Antwort von crazy-spy:
Just the 2nd Post carefully ....
16:9 and keyword search ... na, what is it? Who can help next?
Antwort von Markus:
16:9 brings in the search unfortunately nothing (because of the forum software will not be indexed). Targeting would be sure the word "Cinemascope".
Antwort von Wolfi.:
Guys ...!
At 16:9, the picture is not cut off the top and bottom, but left extended. We speak of the Golden synonymous cut.
Tip: you purchase the latest "video" .. because it is how to 16:9 in the picture right way.
Antwort von usual:
Were it not, of 16:9, or other format? Some shooting I've synonymous on my 16:9 Glotze stripes. Perhaps that's what the André?
Antwort von Markus:
Some shooting I've synonymous on my 16:9 Glotze stripes. Targeting would be sure the word "Cinemascope".
Antwort von wurmac:
vllt. Just another scout hobby?
would certainly be synonymous solution ne ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
If you want to understand, must differentiate between: physical transport format, the aspect ratio and the logical ResolutionUND, visible aspect ratio that the film represents.
Antwort von Axel:
What do you tell? A small story which plays the four walls and superficially realistic? Then stay at 4:3 or 16:9. Major subjects tolerated survival space. It is irrelevant whether it is a Webfilmchen, that man with a single source can cover or a movie on a giant canvas. Because it is changing especially Kadrierung. A narrow strip is filled not with Olaf and Petra, on the IKEA sofa a gentle conversation. If you think Udo but with "Behind the Horizon's next", then from Kasch. To standardized aspect ratios you do not need to worry about.
Antwort von KidKiller Prod:
The thread is so funny =)
Related Links: maybe you can help the next http://www.dvd-tipps-tricks.de/bildformate.php
You need to know whether you are in the same 16:9 aufnimmst if your camera can or whether you are in 4:3 aufnimmst and then in post production with two black bars on the video off you, which of course is not very nice ...
Malte
Antwort von Markus:
... and I was hoping that someone of the relationship 4:3, 16:9 and Cinemascope discovered.
4:3-camcorder -> anamorphic -> 16:9-format
16:9-camcorder -> anamorphic -> CinemaScope format
With an anamorphic and a 16:9 camcorder can rotate Cinemascope without synonymous only one image line to be cut away. ;-)
Antwort von Axel:
With an anamorphic and a 16:9 camcorder can rotate Cinemascope without synonymous only one image line to be cut away. ;-) How does one actually anamorphotic one with the Picture in the Studio? Should we not be regarded as an undistorted picture cameraman to see how a feel for the composition to have?
Antwort von PPanassonicc:
32:13 cinema format is / (unprofessionel seen) s.besten is you take on and look, something that you can burst and simply add 2 strips of YOU!
unprofessional, but looks professional; P
Antwort von Markus:
How does one actually anamorphotic one with the Picture in the Studio? Either one develops a sense as a cameraman for the composition with distorted images (there are so synonymous "only" 33%) or you use a display article, the picture displayed in the Width pulls.
These essays, I have already seen 4:3 displays. Whether the synonymous to fit the 16:9 screen, I do not know.
Rather, I imagine just the question of why someone wants to use the picture that on a widescreen TV to carry black bars? Would not it be interesting to shoot in 4:3? This leads to a 16:9-TV also black, is on a 4:3 television, but not so disgusting ... ;-)
