Frage von efact:
Hello,
I'm of my computer to an HD Camera to rise.
One reason is that when zooming on the editing program (if ichs when shooting again forgot) the DV material very quickly "resolve".
I see this correctly that I have this problem with HD material no longer have?
Thanks for your opinion.
Heike
Antwort von jazzy_d:
But only if you are in an SD project in an HD scene zoom. Otherwise, it is the same.
Antwort von efact:
How exactly do I do about it yet, which means "of SD in HD?
Antwort von efact:
One reason is that when zooming on the editing program (if ichs when shooting again forgot) the DV material very quickly "resolve". Hello Heike.
That you should not do at all.
The film is almost synonymous not zoomed.
Antwort von camworks:
That you should not do at all. The film is almost synonymous not zoomed. zum Bild
Antwort von efact:
SD PAL says normal, ie 768 (or 720) x 576, HD - depending on the device - just more pixels, usually about 1.440 x ....
Digital zoom, nothing else happens, on average, must consist of a small picture of the original material, its pixels get. So about 150x100 pixels of 768 x .... These are digital "inflated" at 768x576 pixels. In this arithmetic, it is now time blurred.
Do you have photos with 2048 x 1500 pixels, etc. (something with 3 MB) or HD material with 1.440 x .... PAL will display just downscaled. If you are fourth on an HD-image digital zoom, then comes out about what PAL provides and still looks sharp from.
Hence the popular reference synonymous Digital Camera from s.der. The same applies to the editing program. Digital zoom just makes since for photos or sense of HD material to PAL resolution.
Antwort von camworks:
yes exactly, so she wants to know whether it is better for hd.
Answer: Yes, is better (if at the circuit output is 720x576 pal).
Antwort von O`Shannon:
Thank you, that answered my question.
LG Heike
Antwort von WoWu:
Because I would not now as safe as the host because if DU HD did you record with approximately, 65 lp / mm and a custom scan a specific detail (in the ideal case of 1 (2 Details / Lp)).
The changes in the quasi-optical zoom not.
Now you give eg 1440 to 1920 again .... have changed your detail resolution of 1 to 0.76 by the non-square pixels.
Then you zoom electronical, which means your details such as resolution goes to a factor of 10 down, because now you distribute the remaining details to be on the plane 1920x1080. There are only so few details displayed.
Then you already interpolierst reduced and several interpolated residual details to your SD signal. 3. Interpolation so already.
We must not make the mistake to say that I have a finer Resolutionund spread them on a smaller picture .... That would imply that only the display size at constant Resolutionverändert .... here is not the case. There are always at the steps and additional details will be lost when the interpolation pixels are not only content but synonymous color together. It is synonymous Farbkontur lost .... and the same several times.
You zoom in SD, So, it remains at a detailed resolution of approximately 65 lp / mm and an interpolation in the zoom because the pixels almost synonymous square. (Should always slightly on the system). The quality thus has every chance to be better.
Antwort von TMaekler:
[quote = "Anonymous"]
Hello Heike.
That you should not do at all.
The film is almost synonymous not zoomed. The fact that I had synonymous reads. If I, however, recent reports or see movies, I think this statement is very doubtful.
