Frage von parolando:
Hello colleagues.
When I look at the video asset Lowlight test image of HF100 Watching (http://www.videoaktiv.de/images/stories/testbilder/ Canon / hf100/hf100_llbeet.jpg), and with the images of other camcorder compare, I would say that the HF100 performs significantly better.
Of course not as good as a VX2000, but still better than any other 1000 euro Camera, synonymous better than HV20/30.
Is the Picture and the resulting knowledge to trust? Can feel a HF100 Tester / owner confirm?
Thanks for the info.
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
I say now cheeky that the shutter to 95% no 1 / 50 sec was (which takes you at a fair comparison with such a test). My own impression is (I have three times had a short side), the HF 100 is the Picture Noise and reason better than the brightness of SonyHC 9 or HV 30 - but not as extreme as it makes the impression.
One must be careful as well, where you can watch the Picture (PC would be good). And if s.LCD, then how is the LCD is configured and what size and he Resolutionhat. HV 30 As a fairly similar LCD, you can at the same basic attitude sometimes a quick first impression.
Such a nice bright 20 & 30 lux Picture to get in my opinion, only with Canon XH A 1 or better camera out.
VG
Jan
Antwort von raymaker:
"significantly better" but it is not. better. but of lousy, it may be synonymous with "not so bad" change.
Antwort von parolando:
Well, I remain - compared with the other photos - in "much better". But its like that all these Lowlight pictures as "bad" are to be considered.
The Camera s.sich is uninteresting to me, since I've seen that they do not have viewfinders.
Antwort von Jan:
Well, that I see differently, at least in the test images of VAD (I do not think so s.gleiche conditions) is the HF 100 significantly brighter Picture:
Canon HF 100 Canon HV 30 VG
Jan
