Frage von Jimmy:
Hello. I know it sounds silly, an old model with a successor to compare. But somehow when I look at the ratings of these 2 Cams (MV800, MV900) look, to me the better mv800 before.
I have the synonymous ever tested. So my opinion has not really good quality.
Is there anywhere on the Inet vllt a Comparison of the two cams, or vllt someone here has experience with this?.
Thank you times,
mfg
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
the gibts überhaupt noch 800 (2005 model)?
The new MD is called 110 (since 2 weeks on the market), many in very little change score.
The Wide Angled different areas have changed in contrast to the MV 900, Focal now 50 mm (4 / 3), 40 mm (16 / 9 - from stability) and 45 mm (16 / 9 to stability), 900 had MV at 16 / 9 (from bar) is less wide. Degree in interior shots is important.
What else is so new?
Now there are several grid lines to fade, a new 16 / 9 screen viewfinder, lowered power consumption on the MV 900, and the higher zoom (35x optical). The rest is as in the total remained the same.
If I remember right, the MV 800 has no input and micro definitely just the simple letterbox 16 / 9 mode.
What you have to chalk up but Canon, it is beautiful the camera an extended unpredictable 16 / 9 mode, unfortunately, the competing Panasonic GS 27 / 60 (35 mm focal) and SonyHC 37 (36 mm focal) at 4 / 3 already better excerpt, which is actually not just for the widescreen 16 / 9 speaks. Whether you are on the stabilizer at the MD 110 may waive the 40 mm to reach everyone decide for himself.
VG
Jan
Antwort von pyjama:
So I did as a backup times mv900 camera in use and had been shaken. the images are completely landed in the trash. okay, it depends on your requirement and preference. we had in lowlight filmed and the camera has totally failed. this is my experience.
Antwort von Jan:
But you must say when the test images of VAD can trust, are in the best Lowlight even before those of SonyHC 23 and Panasonic GS 27th
