Newsmeldung von slashCAM: MacBook Pro 2:53 GHz vs.
2.8 GHz in 3D/Spielebereich of rob - 29 oct 2008 12:42:00 Rob Art Morgan Barefeats.com of the Mid-Range 2:53 GHz MacBook Pro to the optional 2.8 GHz MacBook Pro in terms of 3D gaming performance applies to. Both versions work with the same combinations of graphics card (GeForce 9600M GT 512MB + 256 MB GeForce 9400M). The performance gain was expected to close at 1-9% for an approximately 12% higher price. In
After Effects
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von SixFo:
Wrong Page for the Report würd ich mal sagen ... or just play all the movies rather than real film to shoot?
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
I would be only interested in how the mirror display as in everyday life suggests otherwise is out of his small speed increase so not much to expect ...
And of course, of how the double / changeable GPU setup during cutting can benefit, along with LED lighting could be with his MBP lr really get wireless working ...
Antwort von Daigoro:
1.) who buys for a laptop to play?
b) any person who buys the game for a Mac?
iii) any person who buys a Mac to play with a laptop?
4) Next comes a test which is better than MacBook Frisbee Disc is suitable?
Antwort von mnn:
@ Daigoro sure nobody buys a laptop to play, but I play as synonymous quite happy times on my work laptop, and a sales base for the laptop was synonymous to Spieleperformence ...
Antwort von Daigoro:
@ Daigoro sure nobody buys a laptop to play But But, it's people are synonymous.
Nevertheless, it is not something synonymous nor feed afford such tests.
PSP or Nintendo DS is the much better game machines, because the play was built.
