Frage von Easy Going:
Hello,
to assess the sharpness of HD recordings can last as a 20 "monitor or it must be more?
Antwort von Frank B.:
I would say it depends on the viewing distance. For me it is under 1m. I use a 23 "Full HD monitor of Fujitsu Siemens. I think he's all right. Many other editors to use monitors to 22" inches. I think as s.20 - 26 inches are for a viewing distance of up to 1m ok
If your editing suite allows for a greater viewing distance and you have more space available, I would rather you recommend a FullHD - TV as a control monitor. If you have a lot of money, would be advisable to check professional monitors.
If you also want a good color assessment, I would you to an extra card, as the Canopus HD Storm advise and possibly one Eizo monitor that is designed for PC and video signals. With simple PC monitors, as I use it, we have for the color determination never certainty. But I guess that's with all amateur equipment without calibration, options like that.
Frank
Antwort von ruessel:
Only be cut normal HDV videos, submit a 32 inch device from completely castrated 720s in HD format even smaller. If you work a little professional work in FullHD, synonymous with elaborate masks and
have pixel accuracy, synonymous not disturb a 40 inch device s.Arbeitsplatz. (and my 40 inch unit is about 50) cm of the edge of the table away. Owns one of the internal service menu code, you can calibrate a synonymous Consumer Flat good color. At least that is my personal opinion.
Antwort von actaion:
Hello,
to assess the sharpness of HD recordings can last as a 20 "monitor or it must be more? To assess the optimum sharpness can you need a monitor with at least 1920x1080 resolution (; at Full HD). The size is then (and nearly) no preference (; viewing distance einfahc) accordingly.
Apart from that, the sharpness of assessment for the cut but synonymous secondary. On the edge in processing before you can change anything.
In order to be able to judge about whether now is ok, sharp picture, synonymous extends a smaller resolution.
Much more important is a reasonably accurate representation of colors, brightness and contrast. Because these values can now customize the cut. Therefore, the monitor should show them some correct.
Basic rule for picture-and video editing is: hands off of monitors with TN panels. PVA or IPS panels are all popular.
Antwort von JonasB:
Well so if you have ne HD camera, I would pick synonymous nen HD capable screen say 1980x1080. Solely on the principle, after enjoying full resolution. Cutting can be synonymous with less ... as I said. The rest I can only agree.
MFG
Jonas
Antwort von actaion:
Well so if you have ne HD camera, I would pick synonymous nen HD capable screen say 1980x1080. Solely on the principle, after enjoying full resolution. sure he has presumably a Television.
Antwort von Easy Going:
Hello,
So I am concerned only about the cut and the assessment of the material.
This is all not qualify for a professional - and be oriented so synonymous rather inexpensive - but stop making sense anyway.
Since I have long wavering whether I want to cut again in the future via Mac or PC - for example, was for me the question if I have a iMac20 "enough, or there is a 24" should be.
Would be comparable to a PC solution - synonymous as I would have to buy me something new my old unit no longer works for HDV or AVCHD at all - so I would need synonymous since a monitor satisfies the requirements.
Currently, I tend to share the MAC solution (; with Final Cut Express) - so again specifically - must be / it is the 24 "to be or for cutting 20" enough - what do you mean?
Antwort von Axel:
An iMac so you do not dictate the size of an external second monitor, because the pasted surface of the editing program you so the main monitor. Beyond that I would s.deiner place on the graphics card (watch, 512 as in a 24er version has several advantages, as you ought to change times on FCS and Motion and Color reasonably want to use). With the current MBP with its greatly reduced prices you would have a cool alternative synonymous.
Antwort von High_Tension:
I think that you are in any case a 24 "monitor should take, as have a native resolution of 1920x1080 produce synonymous with this resolution and the optimum focus.
There are certainly synonymous smaller monitors that make it, but None of the cheapest.
As has been said the most important is because the native resolution Interpolation and so does everything else worse appearance properties.
Antwort von Easy Going:
Hello,
With the current MBP with its greatly reduced prices you would have a cool alternative synonymous. Attractive would be a laptop already - but the biggest has MacBookPro 17 "and will cost 2300 ¬ - http://www.apple.com/de/macbookpro/
already quite steep - or you know better Prices or you meant something else?
Antwort von actaion:
with 20 "DV editing can do well without major problems. 24" is of course better, but not absolutely necessary.
A laptop, even of apple is for HD-DV editing, however certainly suboptimal.
Antwort von Axel:
It is the dissolution of her does not need to be taking a bigger iMac because of its display in any case must have timeline, browser, tool palette, and a viewer window of space, all have been successfully rolled to 13 ". The right
must be an external preview monitor, And that should then be bold. It is then not, as I said earlier mistakenly views (; and then, fortunately was corrected) to the canvas, but, depending on the active window to the Canvas
or Viewer, called Apple Cinema Desktop Preview.
Antwort von helot88:
What would become of keeping this monitor? The supposed to be fairly decent. Has anyone with this experience? Especially since he truly synonymous with 23 Inch 16:9 and not 16:10 as usual for PC offers monitors.
http://www.amazon.de/Hewlett-Packard-2309m-Screen-Monitor-Kontrast/dp/tech-data/B001YC4GD0/ref=de_a_smtd
Antwort von Bespi:
What would become of keeping this monitor? The supposed to be fairly decent. Has anyone with this experience? Especially since he truly synonymous with 23 Inch 16:9 and not 16:10 as usual for PC offers monitors.
http://www.amazon.de/Hewlett-Packard-2309m-Screen-Monitor-Kontrast/dp/tech-data/B001YC4GD0/ref=de_a_smtd wenns should be cheap, then look at the views of:
http://geizhals.at/a384605.html
proposes to prosecute in all your costs and synonymous in the business only 210 euro.
And yes these are real 16:9 monitors, 16:10 monitors have 1920 x 1200
Antwort von actaion:
So not a Mac?
I'm right in assuming that the monitor is intended only for the cut, but the Endbetrachtung (then on another device, held TV)?
When you have cut the clips so eh not in full screen, but timeline, controls, etc. drumrum. Since then 16:10 is more favorable than 16:9.
My recommendation would be the
Hyunda W241D http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B000Z1C6UG/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&me=&seller =
or
HP LP2475w
Both 24 "(; 16:10, 1920x1200), both are full (at FULL HD resolution; unscaled) show to be. Both have HDMI input, you can jump the Cam so synonymous s.den monitor connected and watch the clips .
And both have (a better panel type; offer PVA or IPS), the better, more accurate colors, better viewing angle dependency and better contrast / black levels than the affordable monitor with TN.
In addition, the rotatable and height adjustable, and all the cables that are needed as are, are included.
Are synonymous, of course, a bit more expensive, but again quite favorable for the equipment with approximately 450 ¬.
Thus, with the cheapest, which is already a good panel, the HP LP2275w, gets the one already S.300-350 ¬. Then "only" 22 inches and 1680x1050 and no HDMI.
All three have been well evaluated on Prad.de. The Hyundai I've recently been himself.
The least expensive with PVA panel and Full HD resolution, I have found is the Samsung F2380 (; 23 ", 16:9, 1920x1080) for about 280 ¬. But since I have the rapid test results to any found ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Synonymous May I suggest something? ;-)
Good old used tube monitors to 24 "of Sonyoder Eizo
I have to Meihnung as Control and preview monitors and hard to beat ... ok "huge" is used but for 200 -350 euros.
Years ago, I dreamed of and now because of the TFT and LCD craze really a good solution.
In general, I say, people looking for used tube monitors ..... no preference whether the "On Set" or "are at home" this really is an alternative.
The Prices on Ebay have any quality Feteschisten heart beat faster ;-)
As a calibration tool of Datacolor Spyder products are recommended for real ;-)
http://spyder.datacolor.com/
Conclusion: It may not always be expensive to get the best possible out of his money out without directly avarice madness decay.
MfG
B. DeKid
