Frage von Ning:
Will I have for my AH1 a Aufsteckmikro growth. Did the Beyerdynamic MCE 72 PV CAM in the eye. My questions:
1. Fits into the micro-holder of the camcorder?
2. What better alternatives?
Antwort von Touravant:
Hi Ning,
I have not tried MCE 72, but an alternative s.meiner XH-A1 is installed, the NTG 1 of Rode (Australian Manufacturer) with excellent values. On the homepage of Rode, there are sound samples from Micro. In www.thoman.de it is fairly inexpensive to have. In the micro-holder of the XH A1 fits, for example a colored plastic ring (for the identification of security keys) into the cradle is stuck. Then sit the micro without Störschallübertragung good, but not rigid in the cradle.
Good luck with the search (or testing).
Greeting Tour Avant
Antwort von Ning:
Thanks for the tip. Is the Rode NTG-1 is a Micro Stereo?
Antwort von KlausZ:
Thanks for the tip. Is the Rode NTG-1 is a Micro Stereo? No, otherwise the article would make it stop ..
http://www.thomann.de/de/rode_ntg_1.htm
Antwort von TomStg:
You did not describe what the pictures you want to use external mic. Just the mic in ext Camera shoe instead of internal use, you can give. Because an external mic only really makes sense if you are of the Cam and decoupling as close as possible s.die source approach. It is important to what kind of source it is. An interview with a single person needs a different mic than the recording of a theatrical performance, etc.
When your XH A1 you need not worry wg XLR connector and phantom power, because the cam is so equipped. But in many other cams are co-criteria for many ordinary Mics - provided that the sound is with the Cam without an external recording device to be.
Gruss Tom
Antwort von Manuell:
Hi,
So I have the MCE 72 and do so at concerts and plays on my Canon XL2. I am very satisfied with the Microphone and you can often run a few sound examples via email to send.
mfg
Manuel
Antwort von meister hubert:
depends on how much money you're willing to invest ...
ich geh mal assume that it was cheaper than the camera should be =)
But anyway, what budget you move?
Antwort von TomStg:
manuel @
I know these sound recordings to satisfy, because I have two friends in rock bands and record their performances which produces DVD. Here I use a room exclusively for recording micro-environment of Liveatmo of the audience. The actual sound is with a multichannel recorder recorded. Because the synonymous sound mixer provides insufficient for a proper recording, because it is the room acoustics is set, the normally strongly deviates of the hörgerechten.
Compare your times with those of an audio recording purchase DVD. Here you will notice that you with your recording via mic in the camera shoe a very high proportion of area with almost no direct sound aufnimmst. Thus you have the room to sound, but played with the music almost has nothing to do.
This applies even more for theater recordings, where you room with the high proportion of the direct voices of the actors almost garnicht it did - but even more coughing and rustling of the audience. I recommend you strongly in such situations, the recording from the mic Camaraschuh to remove and s.die really sound source approach. You'll be amazed how much better the sound will sound. This has nothing with the mic to do, but just with the modified distance. In the second step, you then have to worry about making the right mic.
Look at this thread at times. This was the topic dealt with in detail:
[/ url] http://forum.slashcam.de/welches-mikro-fur-live-konzerte-vt65069.html[url]
Tom
Antwort von marwie:
It is important to hold that the Microphone Hall within the radius (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallradius) which is otherwise the diffuse sound pressure level greater than the direct sound pressure level.
Antwort von Ficeduld:
Have synonymous the Rode NTG 1 of grad and last Saturday for the first time tried with Tonangel. Sujet what a person says before the landscape, easily in the telecommunications field, ie blurred background .. a situation in which one or the built Aufsteckmikro unusable.
I'm very satisfied with the result. For Atmos, I find the built-okay.
Antwort von Manuell:
@ Tom
you have perfect right of course :-). I film myself mostly concerts and use the recorded sound of the MCE 72 synonymous only to the mix later, if at all. Rather, only for the cut, because I usually do not by the sound mixer hall, as you already said that mix for the room, taking, but previously on a shard of a 2nd Mixer, especially for the DVD sound. I wanted the starter Threat only help with his decision because he is himself the MCE 72 addresses and I've stop unadulterated recordings. I'd probably write something more and will go into detail, just as you did. So thanks for the complement, think that's helpful.
Nevertheless, I wanted to actually say so, the MCE 72 is a good choice for the price :-)
Actually, I wanted to write synonymous nor the one in the audience very well rustle, rustle and cough hear :-). Covered is the only way he prefers times myself listening ;-)
Will I have for my AH1 a Aufsteckmikro growth. Did the Beyerdynamic MCE 72 PV CAM in the eye. My questions:
1. Fits into the micro-holder of the camcorder?
2. What better alternatives? mfg
Manuel
Antwort von Ning:
See straight, that my letter has been lost. Thanks for the many suggestions. Be the Beyer Dynamics with the superior again.
My recording situations:
- Road, townscapes and Interviews
- Stage shots
With Greeting
Ning
Antwort von High_Tension:
I myself use the Rode NTG-2 and the Rode NT-55.
Among the latter, I can only pronounce an unqualified recommendation because the bill capsule from the NT-55 eigtl makes two microphones.
From Beyerdynamic, I would personally advise against because mE a not very transparent and somewhat muddy sound make.
The Rode is also too thin for the micro-holder. That you can but with a strip foam easily circumvent it and have thus synonymous additional insulation.
Antwort von Ning:
Thank you, the NT-55, I refer to the narrower choice.
