Infoseite // Mini DV with 0.8, 1 million. or 3Mio. 720X576 pixels becomes Pal!



Frage von Melange:


Hello,

where exactly is the advantage of a higher resolution camera with up to 3MP, but later if for example if it via firewire on a PC lands back to Mpeg2 with PAL and is approximately 576 x720.
Or maybe there no advantage?

Regards
Melange

Space


Antwort von Wiro:

Hello,
Roughly speaking, there are 2 options:

1) are used camcorderintern Of the 3 million only about 450 000
2) it will be used (almost) every 3 million, but they are camcorderintern downscaled to 720x576 px

The latter is exactly one (slightly) better picture quality - taken at least theoretically. Untrained eyes will not recognize it, however. One should not exaggerate the issue.
Gruss Wiro

Space


Antwort von VolkerS:

These values are mostly related to the built-Stillimage functions, but with video cameras are all modest. So how Wiro suggests, does not overstate

Space


Antwort von Melange:

Thank you!

So you can already save money and buy a current DV Camera with 1 million pixels for example, instead of an expensive device 3Mio pixels.
So I understood correctly: the video result is not significantly more expensive with the 3MP camera.

Regards
Melange

Space


Antwort von Wiro:

Yes, properly understood.
The current Pixelwahn will stop at Videocamcordern be a purchase incentive, as well as before the Lux-Wahn (yah, but my 0 lux, your can only 3 lux). In the many pixels are only good for photos.
A well-made film, but does not live of million pixels of 0 Lux still ;-)))
Gruss Wiro

Space


Antwort von Markus:

"Melange" wrote: So I understood correctly: the video result is not significantly more expensive with the 3MP camera.
No the video is not improved, on the contrary: The more sensor points are on the same image intensifier surface, the worse the Schwachlichtreserven of the camcorder.

Less sensor points, in addition to a discounted purchase price so still have another advantage. ;-)

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Yes the Pixelwahn is omnipresent. The best example
Casio Z 1000 (10 million) with 1 / 1, 8 "CCD from Fuji F 30 (6 million) 1 / 1, 7" CCD.

Color Stillimage has let fall through the Z 1000 literally in the classroom, at ISO 400, a variety of 6 million pixel camera with a smaller 1 / 2, 5 are "CCD better.

The test with the Z 1000 I then made time itself, the interior shots are often so noisy / blurred so that one can only wonder. Fuji F 30 with its 6 million pixels, the absolute number 1 in the SLR in the compact class models - in terms of image quality / speed / battery power for me there is nothing better in the "small" class.

VG
January

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Pixel aspect ratio D1 / DV PAL 16:9 (, 1.42)
new size for Komp.Vorgabe PAL D1 / DV Quad. Pixels?
Mini DV with 0.8, 1 million. or 3Mio. 720X576 pixels becomes Pal!
SonyDCR-PC101E PAL MegaPixel FILTER WHAT SHOULD I USE??
PAL 16:9 pixels wider than 4:3?
DV footage to H.264. Pixel aspect ratio like?
miniDV brings only pixels Picture: o (* PIC *




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash